Worcester Residents Upset With City's Tree Limits

candy wrote:

More and more, I'm thinking this is where the unsourced DNA in this case has come from. BTW, the FBI are looking more and more like the keystone cops in high profile cases these days:
FBI Analyst Accidentally contaminates Chandra Levy case DNA:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

thewhitewitchone wrote:

<quoted text>
One. Always use the same one. Why? Who do you think I am?

candy wrote:

The new investigative team needs to go back, and find out ANYONE and EVERYONE that may have had contact with these garments from the time Dr. Meyer was conducting the autopsy, until the DNA was found and documented in the lab, and make sure they were ALL swabbed.

candy wrote:

The new investigative team needs to go back, and find out ANYONE and EVERYONE that may have had contact with these garments from the time Dr. Meyer was conducting the autopsy, until the DNA was found and documented in the lab, and make sure they were ALL swabbed.

Hope wrote:

<quoted text>That doesn't answer anything, since when do you believe anything Candy says KK? Where's the proof that her source exists? You demand proof when the evidence points to an intruder, but not when it points to a Ramsey? FFJ is a great example of RDI ignorance. Lies, assumptions, plain out proven wrong information and misinformation are acceptable and go uncorrected as long as they are posted by an RDI. WTH? No wonder the trashy lying globe is the only one who gives a crap about what that forum has to say about the new evidence. All the other BORG television media seems to accept that the R's are cleared now. All except FFJ, W. Murphy and the globe. Doesn't that bother you at all? I was RDI until I read this crap and the other crap at FFJ. What about the DNA expert Larry what's his name who says this is great evidence against an intruder? I'm not saying candy is lying, I'm saying name your expert Candy so we can all check him out for ourselves since the BORG have called you delusional and a liar in the past I think its only fair that you back up your claim with some facts. Elvis is a doctor I think she/he trumps your unnamed source that you have hiding in your evidence closet. KK you should be ashamed of yourself. I had a higher respect for you and thought you cared about JB the real story not just whatever supports your opinion.

Biz wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree Candy. I always thought there was a possibility that the DNA could have belonged to an examiner but I have come to find out that it really would be a long shot. They would have had to have dripped one small speck of saliva into the panties precisely in a spot that comingled with JBR's blood and then the same person would have to use their bare hands to pull the long johns off of her.
The same DNA findings were found at different labs without the second lab knowing the results of the first lab if I am understanding this correctly.
This was a Christmas holiday break. Is there a chance that standards could have lapsed? Are all lab workers DNA entered and compared against the victims. One would assume so but I have found out that many things we assume to be done were NOT done in this case.