LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
I find it amazing that she'd stay with someone who supports slaughtering infants. What's the difference between that and staying with someone who advocated NAMBLA's rights to publish their sick sh*t? What's the difference between that and supporting a parent's right to let their kids stay with Michael Jackson, over-night, in his bed? Bottom line, Lala, and you can keep ignoring it all you like: Pupsy does not believe in the extremist AC rhetoric that she posts, here. The only other choice is that she married someone whom she believed sympathized with an action worse than child molestation -- child murder. Personally, I think it's the first one. (58 min ago | post #142781)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
QUOTE who="lalalulu "]<quoted text> Stop StO! Please! I'll do anything you ask! Just! Please! STOP![/QUOTE] Sorry. I posted that last one before I saw these. Didn't know it would bother you so much. I'll stop. I made my point. (1 hr ago | post #142774)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
Of course. This is not a new obsession. It was creepy then, and it's creepy nowLots of stuff about "feelings ". ..and "love" "love" "love".. (ickQUOTE who="Lynne D"]<quoted text> Lulu, please understand, I'm not saying what compelled you choose what you chose was caused by something presupposed or imagined, I know it wasn't, I believe you and understand exactly what you're saying about it. I'm sorry I brought it up, I was trying to better understand your mindset at the time, and trying to help you better understand what your own mindset might have contributed to the decision you made. We can drop it if you'd like. It's too senstive for you and I didn't mean to make you feel like you had to be on the defensive with me about it. That was not at all my intent in asking you what I asked or in saying any of the things I've said. I love you, I understand you, and nothing I say is ever meant to make you feel bad, just to look at and think about different things in a different way, that's all. Much the same way you ask me things or say things to help me look at and see things from a different persepctive. I may not always agree with seeing it the same way, but I see what you show me, always.[/QUOTE] See the weird "relationship " thing, Lynne imagined. I mean, sure, Lala was nice, understanding, forgiving, typical Lala, but she never invited all that. I find it interesting that you spotted Lynne's obsession, without the back-story. These were not hard too find, cause there are pages and pages for days and days with Lynne basically saying the same things, over and over. Like now. (2 hrs ago | post #142765)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
CoolProp. 8 will change the CA state constitution to disallow gay marriage. Rights belonging to the term "civil union" will remain. Remember our discussion regarding what term to use? You said you didn't care what it was called -- "marriage " or "civil union" or a cumquat (thought that was funny then, still do, haha), as long as it afforded equal rights. I'm thinking that you really SHOULD care because all laws that use the language "marriage ", will not include "civil union". A lawyer could challenge a homosexual's legal rights, pertaining to "marriage ", every single time there was a dispute -- because the union would not technically be a "marriage ". See what I'm saying? I think I understand now, why gays make such an issue out of being able to use *that word* to describe their legal commitments and responsibilities. Will be interesting to see how it turns out. I believe the polls are showing a majority voting "No.", so far. (3 hrs ago | post #142755)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
AND the only people who would think of that as a possibility are BIGOTS! If you substitute the groups with Black and White people, it would read something like: Black docs who perform abortions want to eliminate White people because they are angry about slavery and want to get even. Do you see how racist and STUPID that sounds? (4 hrs ago | post #142728)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
Foo: "Really? We do? Since when are you privy to our emails? PFBA, Cham, STO anyone other than Barney (who's PL btw), whens the last time ANY of you got a chatty little email from me?" Uh, never. Btw, did you ever hear back from your Rabbi friend about the link about the Sacred Name? And, have you heard about Prop. 8, in CA? (4 hrs ago | post #142719)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
I don't agree with that definition, eitherI'm PC. (5 hrs ago | post #142687)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
So which is it? 1. You don't believe that abortion equates to slaughtering infants. or 2. You married someone who advocates slaughtering infants. You can just reply with the number, "1." or "2." And who are you kidding? Chicky never gets upset with me. :) (5 hrs ago | post #142684)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT, ANYMORE! ...must type...must repeat...must type...must repeat Poor Lynne. (6 hrs ago | post #142665)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
Thx, GH. Yeah, or worse. Truth-teller's example was if your guy supported and advocated rights for pedophiles, but you could over-look that and marry him, anyway. For pupsy, it's just murdering infants. (6 hrs ago | post #142661)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
Actually, I'm using the Anti-choice definition of "baby", which begins at conception and ends at toddler. According to them, Pro-Choice advocates slaughtering infants. (6 hrs ago | post #142658)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
Guess I missed all the fun, last night. Btw, Chicky, he's not "psychic ". He's just a side-kick. :0) (6 hrs ago | post #142649)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
From last yearCan you guess who that was about? (6 hrs ago | post #142641)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
Lol! This reminds me of last yearQUOTE who="Lynne D"]For the record: I did NOT manipulate Lulu, I manipulated the discussion in the manner with which i was posting one day to merely show the sorts of ways PCers speak to PLer while discussing on topic, and the double standards it shows, they don't appreciate being bull dozed, treated like their clueless and having people treat them as though theiy're the only ones who presnts facts, yet most of what they say are opinions based on a law conding an action many don't condone, abortion. As far as Lulu goes, I had been hoping she'd see that, and see how hypocritical it is for PCers to do that, to try to help her understand why some of us PLers get frustrated in discussion with PCers, by letting her feel the frustration with me, by my doing that with her on topic. I had hoped she'd see that and only that. What PCers were saying about it and what she was saying about it, all false accusations toward me having nothing to do with what i had actually been planning on showing, actually revelaed a great deal about her true feeling toward me off topic, and THAT's what got THAT ball rolling regarding what I could see from her on a personal level. I didn't manipulate HER or any other person here to do say and do what they said and did, they did that all on their own. I was still in the mindset of believing that Lulu really did care about me and really did care to be fair-minded as to what PLers deal with from PCers here, and hoped she'd understand why we get frustrated at the tactics used by PCers in discussion, and how it appears to us. Did she see that? Nope, no more than she was able to see the truth on a personal level about what PCers do to PLers here. That's not MY fault, that's not MY doing, that's her responsibility for what she chooses to see (unfairly), think and feel, and subsequently what she schooses to do that's also unfair. But, [/QUOTE] Harmed spirit posts. :( (6 hrs ago | post #142639)
LETTER: Stand up for the unborn child
You see nothing wrong in characterizing PC as a group of infant torturing, murderous baby-killers? Hate to break it to you, but I have a problem with out-right lies. (6 hrs ago | post #142638)
Like what you see?
Create your own Topix Profile
