At Oxford, smoking dope and burning the American flag... (Sep 24, 2012 | post #27)
Sovereign Citizens and Law enforcement
Hm, who's the racist here? (Sep 16, 2012 | post #5)
Based on your grasp of the written word(or the actual lack of), maybe incarceration would have a wiser choice on the judge's part... (Sep 1, 2012 | post #8)
What a bunch of posers and wannabes, Our Gang will take out any one of those little bit€hes. Stymie, Froggy, Spanky, Alfapha, Buckwheat or me will load up our "slingshots " and bust a cap in someone's a$$... (Sep 1, 2012 | post #185)
Who else would you know that is highly opinionated and was born in '68? (Aug 31, 2012 | post #31)
The only thing Clinton did to create a surplus, was to utterly gut the Military. (Jun 11, 2012 | post #52)
Wrong, since there is no way to test a person to see if they are under the influence of marijuana, it will become a "safety issue". (May 4, 2012 | post #68)
Trayvon Martin - Cape Girardeau, MO
And even more media cover ups come into the light...... (Apr 20, 2012 | post #138)
You have no earthly idea what a true Christian is, and you're wasting your and everyone else's time with your so-called "narrowing down", you do nothing but buy into and further stereotypes. (Apr 19, 2012 | post #60)
death sentance Vs. life in prison
Start making prison an actual punishment again, and you'd see a reduction in crime rates. Build prisons there are nothing but buildings divided up into little 5 x 5 boxes, a bologna sandwich and cup of cherry Koolaid three times a day, no libraries, no gyms, no basket ball courts, etc. No yard time, no visitors, no tv, no phone, no contact with the outside world. Wanna bet the crime rates would drop? (Apr 18, 2012 | post #9)
Dexter man files for 151st District race
Not a Dumocrap!!!! Don't need anymore of those!! (Apr 17, 2012 | post #5)
You can have all the solar panels, wind turbines, etc you want, none of it works, the technology does not exist yet to make any of it viable. (Apr 17, 2012 | post #2)
Yikes! Typos! *stirrer, not stirring; *would BE; *in a few, not so (Apr 17, 2012 | post #38)