It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
Thanks for the laugh, Marky. You said far more than that about the pyramids. And your Israel post was pure numerologyBullshit . You only love the science you agree with. You pick and choose then add your silly, completely non-scientific pyramid, Israel, gravity, electron crap. Certifiable nutjob. Do you stand on street corners on weekends and preach your nonsenseI've lied about nothing. Which is more than I can say for you, Mr DelusionalYou bet. Everyone who thinks Marky is right, raise you hand. (10 hrs ago | post #18551)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
Marky simply accepts what he wants to believe and rejects whatever he doesn't like. He buys into pyramidology and numerology but argues that science has it all wrong. Amazing? Maybe. Delusional more likely. Notice that in spite of several long-winded posts of his, he ignored yours. (Wednesday | post #18483)
Sarah Palin On Evolution: In Her Own Words
I would have considered voting for McCain (a fellow veteran) if it wasn't for Palin. The chance that she might assume the presidency was too much to contemplate. (Tuesday Nov 24 | post #5)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
Oh GEEZ!!! (Tuesday Nov 24 | post #18382)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
That was sarcasm. One more thing that flew over your cuckoo's nest. (Tuesday Nov 24 | post #18380)
Controversy on campus over book by Darwin
From Salon: http://www.salon.c om/books/feature/2 009/11/23/origin_i nto_schools/index. html?source=newsle tter (Tuesday Nov 24 | post #318)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
He didn't say that at all. He said that 'fossilization was heavily tilted wards species with hard body parts that live in environments conducive to fossilization.” Which is true. He never said soft bodies could not leave fossil remains. Nor did he remotely suggest that hard bodied species changed to soft bodies. And the operative word was body PARTS not hard bodies. Comprehension! (Tuesday Nov 24 | post #18355)
It's the Darwin crowd that lacks the facts in evolution debate
I think I stick with Nostradamus. (Monday Nov 23 | post #18307)
William Dembski would like to use copyright to quash criticism
Dembski is pissing into the wind. He won't get anywhere with this. Fair use is fair use and critical analysis of his 'work' would fall under fair use. (Monday Nov 23 | post #3)
Controversy on campus over book by Darwin
Cause he loves us? (Friday Nov 20 | post #279)
Controversy on campus over book by Darwin
You ARE kidding, right? A lack of evidence can never be construed to be evidence. (Friday Nov 20 | post #276)
Controversy on campus over book by Darwin
Not that you're likely to pay any attention to it (since it appears your mind is already made up), here's a list of examples: http://en.wikipedi a.org/wiki/List_of _transitional_foss ils Note there are a lot of pretty pictures you may like. (Friday Nov 20 | post #267)
Should evolution be taught in high school?
Charles Dawson was an amateur English archaeologist who studied law in school but never obtained a degree in any field. Any scientific titles he may have had were honorary. (Thursday Nov 19 | post #30976)
Controversy on campus over book by Darwin
I'll respond any damn time I feel like it, JackassNot at allAwwww. Poor baby! Here, have a cookie. (Thursday Nov 19 | post #208)
Controversy on campus over book by Darwin
And you failed to understand a simple explanation. Wait. Let me correct that. You REFUSE to understand a simple explanation. (Thursday Nov 19 | post #206)
Neighborhood:
West Central Florida
When I'm Not on Topix:
I'm doing something useful. Or sleeping.
Read My Forum Posts Because:
You've got nothing better to do.
I'm Listening To:
The voices in my head.
On My Mind:
Friday.
I Believe In:
Unbelievers.