Comments
249
Joined
Jan 12, 2009
Badges
eleve
Recent Posts
Former Salinas hospital sleep tech enters battery plea
Monitoring penile tumescence is NOT a part of most sleep studies. There are specific indications for this (i.e., determining the etiology of erectile dysfunction), and many sleep labs do not perform such testing. Without a physician's order and the patient's informed consent for such, there is no reason for a patient's genitalia to to exposed to or touched by the technologist at any time during a sleep study (with the exception of a patient requiring/requesting assistance in the lavatory or with a bedpan). (Tuesday Nov 24 | post #3)
Medical board accuses Bergstrom
Your note is touching, and seems to be sincere, speaking honestly from your own experience. However, from what you say, you've not been here for the majority of Carl's career (and escapades). You might ask some of your colleagues about what they saw in the days before hospitalists, when internists would pull ER backup. Several posters in these forums have talked about being witness to an intoxicated Dr. B on duty in the hospital. You might also ask about what prompted his move to Idaho. Also, have you read the articles detailing the events surrounding the transcripts that included Carl buying cocaine, offering to trade it for sex, using it, and then giving phone orders for patient care? That tape pretty quickly made it to hospital administration and the California Medical Board; you can read about their response and the net consequence to Bergstrom (apparently nil). So while I absolutely agree with you that the majority of local physicians do not condone, as you aptly put it, his gross misconduct, it has been widely known for years, even by those who were outside his closest circle. Ergo, it's understandable (and maybe justified) that there is the perception that the profession "protect[s] it's [sic] own", because clearly his occasionally criminal and occasionally unethical behavior was overlooked, excused and dismissed to some degree. I think we have to acknowledge that we don't have a good system in place for peer review/censure once a physician is licensed and practicing. There were some posts by PatricParamedic who offered some interesting comments and insight. (Here's a link to on of his posts: http://www.topix.n et/forum/source/mo nterey-county-hera ld/TQPJ3OR4OOR2S7T QQ/p2 ). He apparently has done a good deal of research about physician misbehavior and the consequences (or lack thereof). (Thursday Nov 12 | post #19)
Art owners ask FBI for probe of Sheriff's Office
Has A. Benjamin been on a house hunting holiday in Hood River? This sounds as if it could have been written by him. (Nov 4, 2009 | post #25)
Pollock painting may not exist, artist's nephew says
Does anyone else think that if this is proven to be a false report Amadio and Kennaugh should be required to reimburse law enforcement agencies (read "taxpayers ") for the investigation costs? (Oct 11, 2009 | post #45)
Pollock painting may not exist, artist's nephew says
Interesting - thanks for posting. (Oct 11, 2009 | post #41)
Pollock painting may not exist, artist's nephew says
Strange as it may seem, she is there: http://members.cal bar.ca.gov/search/ member_detail.aspx ?x=139625 Member #139625 (Oct 10, 2009 | post #21)
Pollock painting may not exist, artist's nephew says
Bull's-eye! (Oct 10, 2009 | post #10)
Insurance coverage remains mystery
St. John is listed: http://members.cal bar.ca.gov/search/ member_detail.aspx ?x=139625. These are the parts of today's story that made me laugh: "Documents providing some details about the [missing] pieces were provided to investigators Friday...Amadio said his...defense lawyer, Shawn Mills, faxed the papers to a detective at the Sheriff's Office, hoping to put an end to complaints from the department that he and Kennaugh have not cooperated with officers investigating the theft." AND "A packet of art images and short descriptions taken from Wikipedia given to reporters at Friday's press conference, Richards said, 'doesn't establish authenticity or ownership. Any high school kid with a computer can put that out'." His DEFENSE attorney faxed some paperwork providing SOME details THREE WEEKS after the burglary was reported. Why did he need a lawyer for defense if he was cooperating with the investigation to recover his $80M? If it suddenly turned up, why not hand-carry it immediately to ensure correct delivery of readable material? The second quote from the article says it all. Descriptions taken from Wikipedia? Really??? (Oct 10, 2009 | post #3)
Monterey beach cross to be replaced
EDITOR ALERT: That Spanish explorer's name needs an "a" (Portola or Portolá). (Oct 7, 2009 | post #1)
Pebble Beach art heist puts collectors in spotlight
Agree completely. It seems incomprehensible that two savvy gentlemen (or anyone else in their right mind) would keep property valued in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars in a location lacking sophisticated security. The statement that their loss is due to a window lock that they had previously identified as broken, and could have fixed for, at most, a couple of hundred bucks, seems to indicate one (or more) of the following: 1. A ridiculous degree of negligence. 2. That the items weren't as valuable as they're claiming. 3. A set up in which they participated. Can you think of a benign and logical reason they would kept such expensive pieces in a place they had identified as not being secure? (Oct 4, 2009 | post #7)
Medical board accuses Bergstrom
Regarding the status of his license, it seems it was suspended upon his conviction July 27 (from The Herald article "Accounts Differ on Bergstrom Transcripts": "The Medical Board suspended the license of Bergstrom in the wake of his conviction.") Now that the request for a new trial has been denied and he's been sentenced, they're moving to revoke it. Regarding the impact on his patients, I do believe he gave very good care to many people over the years, but certainly concede that you make an excellent point, and that (unfortunately) there's likely truth to it. I'm curious to know if he made a contingency plan for his patients prior to his conviction. (Sep 30, 2009 | post #12)
Bergstrom to appeal for new trial
Well said - thanks. (Sep 28, 2009 | post #88)
Bergstrom to appeal for new trial
No, cocaine wasn't listed among the drugs found on either tox. screen (as far as was reported). However, in addition to the high BAC, Bergstrom tested positive for two drugs that a recovering addict (as he is) would have avoided were he trying to be clean and sober. It bespeaks current addiction issues, as well as a disregard for the law. Why are you averse to other posters bringing up his drug and alcohol use? Worthington and Keeley both talked about it, and Bergstrom later testified about it. The California Medical Board is citing that as one of the reasons for revoking his license, so apparently it's thought to be relevant. (Sep 28, 2009 | post #87)
Bergstrom to appeal for new trial
Do you have anything factual (i.e., a news article, a court case number, etc.) to back up your statement of "jane doe will sue anyone to make money off of them"? Or is this just another of you inflammatory rants? With your 50 or so screen names, it's no wonder people don't know to whom to direct their responses. You're entitled to your opinion, but on what is it based? (Sep 28, 2009 | post #86)
Bergstrom to appeal for new trial
What does this mean? (Sep 28, 2009 | post #85)
Looking for more people on Topix? Browse the Family Album and see who's saying what!|
Reach local customers. Engage a specific demographic. Maximize business-to-business opportunities. Topix can deliver your message.
|
Copyright ©2009 Topix LLC
