Obama-Marriage Debate - Akron, OH

RU_Kiddingme wrote:

<quoted text>
So you support Americans who join al-Qaeda? You're aces.

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
And if he were a R, you'd be cheering.
woof

RU_Kiddingme wrote:

<quoted text>
So you support Americans who join al-Qaeda? You're aces.

Puke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Diversion fail. Does Obama or does Obama NOT execute Americans without indictment or trial?

Puke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
You're more of an ass than I ever expected.

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Because you disagree with me, I am an ass???
Sounds a bit Un-American. Certainly not Christian.
woof

Puke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Diversion fail. Does Obama or does Obama NOT execute Americans without indictment or trial?

RU_Kiddingme wrote:

<quoted text>
Read the Constitution again. Treason is not one of your inalienable rights.

Puke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny, I don't recall the suspension of Article One of the Constitution.

Puke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
Disagreeing with you is unAmerican? Who died and made you Joe McCarthy? How do you get through doors with that huge head?
Why bring religion into this? Does it fit your narrow minded viewpoint better if you can pigeonhole me into a certain religion? If it makes you feel better, Ass, go right ahead.
barf

RU_Kiddingme wrote:

<quoted text>
Read the Constitution again. Treason is not one of your inalienable rights.

Duke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
No, but calling people names just because they have a different perspective than yours hardly sounds like well-spirited, good ol fashioned American debate. And its not Christian either. That's all I said. You need not take it so personally.
woof

Puke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
You p^ssy. You won't even answer the question.
Check this out.
Why should the public believe what the Obama administration says about the people being assassinated by drones? Especially since, as we learn in the New York Times, the administration came up with a semantic solution to keep the civilian death toll to a minimum: simply count all military-age males in a strike zone as combatants. The rationale, reminiscent of George Zimmerman’s justification for shooting Trayvon Martin, is that “people in an area of known terrorist activity, or found with a top Qaeda operative, are probably up to no good.” Talk about profiling! At least when George Bush threw suspected militants into Guantanamo their lives were spared.
--
Is that me? No. Is it someone I normally agree with? No.
It's Medea Benjamin of CodePINK. As much as I differ with Benjamin, I respect that opinion more than yours, because you won't admit it when your party leader is an epic failure.
Keep at it, though, I like watching you dig holes for yourself.

RU_Kiddingme wrote:

<quoted text>
I did answer the question. Perhaps you're not bright enough to realize that I did.
Again. Joining al-Qaeda is not one of your inalienable rights. Even if these "Americans" just went to a meet-and-greet mixer with al-Qaeda, kill them. I don't care. Good for President Obama.
Now what do you have to say, bitch?

Duke for Mayor wrote:

In case some folks haven't noticed, or don't remember, the person responsible for murdering over 3000 people on 9/1/11 is no longer among the living, and so are several of his henchmen and followers, some of them American citizens who joined the bastards overseas.
Innocent people get killed in wars. Its happened for centuries.

Puke for Mayor wrote:

<quoted text>
How do you people keep from throwing up from all your spin?
Foreigners are now on trial for the events of which you speak.
Apparently, for you, Americans don't deserve the same treatment.