Nuclear Power Debate - Summerville, GA

Rather than coming in here and saying anything, why don't you document what she said as being wrong. I don't know what is going on but she sounds pretty smart
to me, anyway all I want to know is the truth of the matter.

jojo12 wrote:

Rather than coming in here and saying anything, why don't you document what she said as being wrong. I don't know what is going on but she sounds pretty smart
to me, anyway all I want to know is the truth of the matter.

She is smart, but radiophobic, a limited form of insanity that corrupts her intelligence. Virtually everything that she says about radiation and human health has been exhaustively documented as false.

show me the document that says that

"Georgia Power and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission are overriding concerns about the environment and human health in order to built the first new nuclear power plants in the U.S. in several decades"

http://ifyoulovethisplanet.org/...

JAPAN TO EVACUATE 40 MILLION OF ITS CITIZENS!

http://youtu.be/MiJ98r4eWWo

jojo12 wrote:

show me the document that says that

You wouldn't read it.

Fukushima - Could 85 Times More Cesium than Chernobyl be Released?

http://youtu.be/Td33YHsh_WQ

jojo12 wrote:

Fukushima - Could 85 Times More Cesium than Chernobyl be Released?
WQ

No. Telling lies does not change the laws of physics.

Fukushima "even worse than thought" Nuclear Meltdown Dr. Bill Deagle p2 of 2

http://youtu.be/Vo-qIE0J9D4

Helen Caldicott: San Onofre & Nuclear Power Reality

http://youtu.be/SWwCcCUsgdA

jojo12 wrote:

Helen Caldicott: San Onofre & Nuclear Power Reality

Helen Caldicott has no intellectual connection to nuclear power reality.

Don Kosloff do you want people to obey whatever you say?

jojo12 wrote:

Don Kosloff do you want people to obey whatever you say?

I present facts. I suppose people could be obedient to facts. But it is a bit more complex than being obedient. For example, the laws of physics are facts. If I present the laws of physics, there is no question of being obedient to me. But it is not possible to avoid being obedient to the laws of physics. Dr. Caldicott presents information that is contrary to the laws of physics and the reality of medical science. Then she encourages, even demands, thst people take action in obedience to her insanity. I merely suggest that people pay at least equal attention to reality.

Would you please document your facts so I could go read the facts?

jojo12 wrote:

Would you please document your facts so I could go read the facts?

The ate not my facts, the are the facts, which you could have easily discovered on your own if you were actually interested in actual scientific information. For example, the French Academy of Science has a recent formal public statement on radiation effects that is based on review of the relavent physical and medical science.

Oops, there are two typos in my above posting. The first sentence should begin "They are not my facts, the are the facts".

Don Kosloff wrote "French Academy of Science has a recent formal public statement on radiation effects that is based on review of the relavent physical and medical science."
I could only find a 2006 article but I found a recent New York Times article that seemed ok with radiation
but had a rebuttal piece:"As for the French National Academies, David Brenner has pointed out in print that the relevant committees were heavily loaded with folks connected to the nuclear industry in France. France, with its heavy dependence on nuclear power has an interest in not weakening confidence in nuclear energy. I can recall being barred from entering France,. because of my views on the potential consequences of nuclear accidents."

Here is the article:http://dotearth.blogs. nytimes.com/2011/03/24/warning -whiplash-with-radiation-in-th e-news/

http://youtu.be/hUt_l1EuCvo

"Fukushima Fuel Pools Are an American National Security Issue"

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/05/senato...