Nuclear Power Debate - Auburn, WA

It could lower the cost of electricity and bring in jobs.

They're fine! and all the idiots who think there's a waste problem need to talk to a scientist.

There is not enough hydroelectric power available for future generations. Building Nuclear power now will insure electric power for all in the future.

why nuke power in Pacific NW with abundant hydroelectric power and other safer alternatives?

NukeFree wrote:

why nuke power in Pacific NW with abundant hydroelectric power and other safer alternatives?

Because they can't meet the demand. Of course you wouldn't know anything about that.

We need nuclear power together with all of the above. Since this area is earthquake prone, I believe that we should develop Thorium reactors and look into what Bill Gates is supporting... Wave nuclear reactors that burn up the U-238 leaving almost no waste and with existing spent fuel rods, he says we can power the USA for hundreds of years without the intense radiation associated with existing reactors. Apparently China, Russia and other nations have big efforts in these areas.
Make sure we get whatever we build onto very stable ground because if we cannot be certain that an earthquake level 9 or greater or volcano etc., will occur, we have no business building any major component of our infrastructure in uncertain locals.
Peace, Bob

More safe than ever