Immigration Debate - Woodridge, IL

who="Smedskjaer"]Bec ause of the benefits to the local, state and national economy, immigration, legal and illegal, outweights concerns about our tax money being stolen through welfare for illegals, or lost jobs since they add as many jobs they take.
In terms of culture, the state is not allowed to care about what kind of culture any group has. Freedom of speech and freedom of religion means the state must keep its lips shut and hands off.
National security is not put at risk and local violent crime does not go up as a result of illegal immigration. Immigrants try to keep as low a profile as possible.
So given those three points, I see no reason to support a law that targets people that do not 'look' American-UM YEAH AND WHENS THE LAST TIME YOU HAVE BEEN TO AMERICA? WOW YOU REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHATS GOING ON HERE-AND CANT TELL THE DIFERENCE BETWEEN A "HUMANATARIAN EFFORT" AND PAID EXTORTION WTF?

Really

The above post is from someone who doesn't know his geography or understands what the word 'expat' means. I am American.

SMEDSJAER-AND GUESS WHO ELSE WANTS SOMETHING BETTER FOR THEMSELVES IS "HUMAN" HAS THE "ABILITY TO PROCREATE"AND ARE "HARD WORKERS"? AMERICANS !AND THEY ACTUALLY HAVE SOMETHING TO SHOW FOR IT DON'T THEY? HOW MANY STATES HAVE TO GET "OKIE DOKED" OUT OF BEFORE PEOPLE FIGURE OUT THAT 'THOSE WHO DON'T LEARN FROM THE MISTAKES OF THEIR PAST ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT"
"PROGRESS" IS A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY
THUSLY WHY THE RICH ENTITLED CALIFORNIANS HAVE ADAPTED MEXICOS WAYS AND CONSIDER THEMSELVES INTELLECTUAL NOW FOR SPEAKING MEXICAN,EATING TACOS AND NOT BATHING ? REALLY??(opting for that bottle of perfume instead,making them "water conservationists"??wtf

Wow, a little too hard on the caps lock there buddy.
Your whole argument seems to be a diversion from the central topic. Scandinavia has nothing to do with immigration from Mexico to the United States. Universal health care is not relevant to the United States.
The issue at hand is racism, stereo types and macro-economic gains or losses. Please, stay on topic.

I post here, because I grew up in Illinois. Woodridge, 63rd street.
I see no matter what, you are going to spew racist line after line with your caps lock on. Why do you bother posting in a debate form unless your goal is specifically to disrupt the debate?
I suppose you are of the opinion, taking their land was the best thing that could happen to them?
Is it the white man's right to take land?
Please answer it. I dare you to.

SMEJKAR-AND THE REASON MEXICANS AND AZTECS HAVE BEEN CONQUORED PEOPLES FOR SO LONG? THEY HAVE BEEN CODEPENDENT ON WHITEY FOR YEARS AND FOR THE SAME REASON THEY MIGHT HAVE PRIDE"(for what i don't know) THEY WILL MAKE ANY STATE THEY CAN GET INTO A BANKRUPT SLAVE STATE AS WELL -ITS KINDA OBVIOUS LOOKING AT CALIFORNIA -DO YOU REALLY THINK PEOPLE MAGICALLY CHANGE WHEN THEY CROSS A STATE LINE?
WHAT DELUSIONAL TWILIGHT ZONE EPISODE ARE YOU LIVING IN ?

Rep. Smith: Illegal Immigrants at the Top of President’s Jobs Agenda
Tuesday, August 14, 2012, 3:01 PM EDT - posted on NumbersUSA

Rep. Lamar Smith
The Department of Homeland Security tomorrow will begin accepting applications from illegal immigrants seeking to benefit from the President’s amnesty program. On June 15, President Obama announced that his Administration will stop deporting and begin giving work permits to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) criticized the implementation of the Obama administration’s amnesty program.

There is little that’s clear about the President’s jobs agenda but it’s crystal clear that he has placed opportunities for illegal immigrants to work in the U.S. at the top of his list. With unemployment at 8.3%, it’s unconscionable that the Obama administration’s amnesty program actually requires illegal immigrants to apply for work authorization in the U.S. This undercuts the 23 million unemployed or underemployed Americans.

The President’s amnesty program is a magnet for fraud and abuse. While potentially millions of illegal immigrants will be permitted to compete with American workers for scarce jobs, there seems to be little if any mechanism in place for vetting fraudulent applications and documentation submitted by illegal immigrants. With Americans’ jobs on the line, the Administration should take all the necessary steps to protect their livelihoods.

Because there is no fee for the amnesty application, American taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for President Obama’s amnesty when the Administration comes running to Congress for more money to clear the backlog created by the program. American taxpayers should not be forced to bail out illegal immigrants and President Obama’s fiscally irresponsible policies.

How can the Administration justify implementing a fraud-ridden program that will deprive Americans of jobs and cost taxpayers? President Obama and his administration routinely put partisan politics and illegal immigrants ahead of the rule of law and the American people. With this track record, it’s looking more likely that even President Obama may lose his job in this economy when Americans go to the polls this November.

Recently, Chairman Smith and Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Charles Grassley sent a letter to the Obama administration regarding the cost of the administrative amnesty program. They also sent a letter to the Department of Homeland Security yesterday expressing concerns about fraud and abuse.

Smedskjaer wrote:

I post here, because I grew up in Illinois. Woodridge, 63rd street.
I see no matter what, you are going to spew racist line after line with your caps lock on. Why do you bother posting in a debate form unless your goal is specifically to disrupt the debate?
I suppose you are of the opinion, taking their land was the best thing that could happen to them?
Is it the white man's right to take land?
Please answer it. I dare you to.

63rd & Hobson?