Health Care Debate - Overland Park, KS

The Hero wrote:

No socialism now, no socialism ever.

The Hero wrote:

No socialism now, no socialism ever.

SarcasmIsALostArt wrote:

<quoted text>
Socialism is a buzz word used by those who lack enough intelligence to articulate their points. Spell out what's so wrong about the plan if you're so opposed to it.

V for Vendetta wrote:

Government run banks, insurance companies, car companies, Healthcare and so on and on and on. If it is not Solialism, it is the text book definition of Marxism. Attacking the messenger is the sign of brain dead Obama Zombie who wants big brother government to control every thing he does. What he eats, wears, drives and what Doctor he can see. Wake up before you get what you are surely asking for. V
<quoted text>

SarcasmIsALostArt wrote:

<quoted text>
Absolutely not. Attacking the messenger is someone tired of the same old dribble from the same old blue haired wonders who haven't realized that the world has changed.
I'm a registered Demo, but vote best candidate in every election, no matter which party they belong to.
I hate the bailouts, I hate government owned motors and I am certainly not neccesarily a huge fan of SOME of what is contained in the health bill. However I'm also a realist. Let us bask in your Economic genius and tell us what you would have done in Bush/Obama's shoes. This is both their doing you know.
It's all fine and dandy to criticize till you're blue in the face but if you can't offer up a valid alternative, you're nothing more than a talking head.
Love your screen name as well. About as original as well...you get my drift. Tell Glenn Beck he can suck it. ;)

The Hero wrote:

I certainly would not have bailed out the banks and auto makers. It did not help them. Most of the banks were ready to pay back the bail outs, but the government did not allow it. GM was bailed out and still went filed for bankruptcy.
The whole purpose of our economy is to let what works succeed and what does not fail. Where companies failed, there would have been others, non-government, who came in and taken it over.
The real failure here was the government. They failed to enforce laws already on the books. Our law makers were looking out for their own interest and yes some of them see this as a good socialist moment.
Health care is now the target. 70 to 80 percent of Americans are happy with what we have. Socialist are using a small minority of people to change a imperfect, but the world most sucessful Health Care System in the world. Letting the government take over health care will lead to certain failure. Just like so many other things the government has done.
I have spelled it out for you, because you cannot figure out what I ment by socialism. Do you understand now?
<quoted text>

drk wrote:

A public option needs to be included in healthcare reform.

WeimMom wrote:

I do not trust "illegals" will not get health care, I do not trust "elimination" of private insurance companies will not happen, I do not trust "Price" to the taxpayers. I do not trust "Obama Administration"!

Francine wrote:

<quoted text>
You should be issued a bucket of sand and a large wooden mallet.

former kansan wrote:

<quoted text>
What a great RED STATE comeback. Feel free to stick your head in the sand. You don't have a family member with a pre-existing condition. Until then, BE QUIET!!!

Amos Brown wrote:

<quoted text>
To call you a douche bag would be an insult to douche bags everywhere. A pre-existing condition is a condition that you have before you finally decide to buy insurance. Here's a thought - buy the insurance BEFORE you need it. Until then, SHUT UP!!!