Health Care Debate - Massapequa Park, NY

Discuss the national Health Care debate in Massapequa Park, NY.

Do you support President Obama's health care policy?

Massapequa Park supports
Support
 
75
Oppose
 
65

Vote now in Massapequa Park:

TV MAN

United States

#1293 Feb 7, 2012
Bruser wrote:
Uncle Scam, or Uncle Sam?
Obamaism, Green eggs and Ham(Obama scam)
I do not like this Uncle Sam,
I do not like his health care scam.
I do not like these dirty crooks,
or how they lie and cook the books.
They call us names when we speak out,
The Czars use all their DC clout.
The media backs the White House lies,
it doesn't matter how hard we try.
To show the world what he's about,
that he's a dictator, there is no doubt.
I do not like when Congress steals,
I do not like their secret deals.
I do not like this skinny man,
I do not like his 'No WE CAN't".
It seems to me we've lost our way,
I long for times like yesterday.
When Ronny spoke and we had such pride,
Now they force us on Barak's free ride.
I do not like his spending spree,
I'm smart, I know, that nothing's free.
I do not like the smug replies,
when I complain about his lies.
I do not like his kind of hope.
I don't like being called a dope.
I've always worked hard with much pride,
now he tells us "Pay for others free ride".
The riders are those who never pay,
or worked hard, not one single day.
I think that we would all do fine and well,
to tell Barak the phony, to go to HELL!!!
(Anonymous Author)
Yawning.
Justknowit

Brentwood, NY

#1294 Mar 2, 2012
TV MAN wrote:
<quoted text>Yawning.
The re-election of obama will not happen because 80% of Americans despise his lies.
TV MAN

United States

#1295 Mar 2, 2012
Justknowit wrote:
<quoted text>
The re-election of obama will not happen because 80% of Americans despise his lies.
Really! I guess will find out, however polls show Obama receiving 66% of womens vote. Guess what? More women vote then men.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1298 May 3, 2012
Dictator Obama Issues New Threat to Supreme Court over ObamaCare

In his latest display of his full USA federal government dictatorship over both the American people and the former co-branches of government, Dictator Obama is warning the Supreme Court to either rule in his favor or face severe consequences.


Fox News’ Martha McCallum advised Thursday that the Obama Administration has been quietly sending missives to the Supreme Court threatening that if it doesn’t rule in his favor on ObamaCare, Medicare will face disruption and “chaos.” Therefore, if SCOTUS rules in favor of the US Constitution, Obama & Co will begin its campaign to either destroy Medicare or make those on it suffer greatly. The Obama syndicate is said to be threatening to hold off Medicare payments to doctors and hospitals if SCOTUS does not comply with Obama’s demands and submit to him.

As an additional example of Obama’s illegal and (I believe) highly treasonous behaviors, on 1 May and 2 May Obama issued two additional unconstitutional and illegal Executive Orders. The first E.O., issued 1 May 2012, makes the USA subject to “international regulations” as opposed to looking to and following the US Constitution. Also, with this new E.O., the US FDA will now be able to be bypassed by International committees—thus, replacing the FDA with any international group which may be chosen. In essence, Obama is quickly eliminating US Sovereignty and selling the USA to the international “community.”


The second E.O. issued in 2 days was signed by Obama on 2 May 2012. This E.O. instructs the USA to bow to international regulations instead of the US Constitution and Businessweek reports:“Obama’s order provides a framework to organize scattered efforts to promote international regulatory cooperation, the chamber’s top global regulatory official said today.

“Today’s executive order marks a paradigm shift for U.S. regulators by directing them to take the international implications of their work into account in a consistent and comprehensive way,” Sean Heather, vice president of the chamber’s Center for Global Regulatory Cooperation, said in an e-mailed statement.” This also brings the USA closer to becoming a “North American Union” and—also—eliminating its sovereignty—in toto.

Suffice it to say, no one in Congress has issued even the proverbial “peep” over either of these illegal “orders.” Do the American people really want to continue to live under this blatant tyranny?

The second question is “Will the Supreme Court of the United States of America bow to Obama and give up its co-equal status to the dictator as the US Congress has already done?” If so, perhaps its time for We-the-People to recruit the Honduran Supreme Court who, along with their military, ousted its then President Manuel Zelaya who had become a dictator. Oppression under the Obama syndicate becomes worse each and every day, folks. Will we ever choose to go back to the sunshine?

“http://kyrani99. wordpress.com/”

Since: Oct 11

Bentleigh, Australia

#1299 May 6, 2012
Guys, guys you wouldn't even need Big Pharma care.. oups! I mean health care if you knew the truth. Have a look here http://kyrani99.wordpress.com/
I haven't needed a doctor in 20 years!
Finnegan

Dallas, TX

#1300 May 6, 2012
KYRANI wrote:
Guys, guys you wouldn't even need Big Pharma care.. oups! I mean health care if you knew the truth. Have a look here http://kyrani99.wordpress.com/
I haven't needed a doctor in 20 years!
Spam from an Ausshole. You're even more full of $hit than TVMAN

“http://kyrani99. wordpress.com/”

Since: Oct 11

Kellyville, Australia

#1301 May 6, 2012
Finnegan wrote:
<quoted text>Spam from an Ausshole. You're even more full of $hit than TVMAN
You have gone to all of my comments so what's your problems?
Maybe you don't like the truth.
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1303 May 24, 2012
The mandate is ILLEGAL
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1304 May 26, 2012
Two months ago, Barack Obama decided he could intimidate the United States Supreme Court into finding his namesake healthcare plan Constitutional. Overturning the Affordable Care Act “…would amount to an unprecedented, extraordinary step of judicial activism” said the President at a rare White House news conference, adding “…I’m confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”

Though someone with the hyper-arrogant mentality of the Manchurian Candidate doesn’t really need a reason to direct this sort of psycho-babble at a presumptive enemy, Obama was probably responding to information provided by far left Justice Elena Kagan that the Court’s closed-door, preliminary vote on ObamaCare had not gone very well. Each Friday, the 9 justices gather for an initial vote on the cases heard during the week. And although these weekly conferences are to be strictly confidential, it’s a safe bet that Obama’s Court stoolie was on the phone with the White House minutes after its conclusion.

However, as this preemptive strike on the court was met with a nationwide flurry of criticism even from a number of his media supporters, Obama made no further reference to the prospective ruling.

But on Monday, a new county was heard from. Dedicated leftist Senator Patrick Leahy directed a 2000 word dissertation at the Court from the Senate floor, selecting as his principle target Chief Justice John Roberts.“The constitutional challenge to the Affordable Care Act is the current instance in which narrow ideology and partisanship are pressuring the Supreme Court to intervene where it should not,” claimed Leahy, making clear his view that the Court has no business interfering with a Congressional assault on the Constitution. The senator advanced the 2000 Bush/Gore decision as an example of the sort of “judicial activism” that “shook the confidence of the American people in the Supreme Court.” He ridiculed conservative justices for their tough questioning of principle ObamaCare advocate Solicitor General Donald Verilli during oral arguments, stating “their action will not help restore American’s confidence in the Court to fairly apply the law.”

And he alternately praised and threatened the Chief Justice, literally claiming that if Roberts joined other conservatives in a 5-4 decision against ObamaCare it would “…undoubtedly further erode the reputation and legitimacy of the Supreme Court.”

But what prompted Leahy’s sudden decision to lecture the Supreme Court as to its proper role in government? Was it a last ditch effort to intimidate justices into finding ObamaCare constitutional? Or has Kagan perhaps advised Democrats that Roberts is “wavering” a bit, leading Leahy to believe his misguided, nonsensical claims might persuade the Chief Justice to decide in favor of passage?

Since its enactment in 2010, liberals have believed the Affordable Care Act to be a sure thing to pass Constitutional muster. They were stunned when Justices took offense at the law’s contempt for individual liberty during oral arguments. After all, how could forcing Americans to purchase something they don’t want be unconstitutional if it’s for their own good!

If 5 Justices rule the ObamaCare individual mandate unconstitutional, the American people will hear a wailing and gnashing of teeth unequaled since the pro-Gore efforts of the Florida Supreme Court were undone after the 2000 election. We will be in for some very entertaining days.
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1305 May 28, 2012
Why the presidents mandate for Contraceptive coverage forcing on basis of Religious freedom will be struck down:

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/05...

And as this Law Professor states, "I am not a Catholic or believer of the Catholic faith. Further his arguments against the Presidential Mandate coverage, were also argued by none other than Supreme Court Justice Kagan, when she was Solicitor General.
TV MAN

United States

#1306 May 29, 2012
Bruser is a "FOOL" and here is why.

Why I believe the right doesn't care about deficits.
"RESULTS"
Hasn't everyone learned the trickle doesn't trickle?
If it does, show me the proof.
What I do know. Based on IRS studies.

Even if you don't accept these facts, everyone knows the rich are getting richer at a faster pace. Why? Transfer of wealth.
The rich have all the leverage.
Only regulation can stop it.
I don't call this a free market, I call it financial dictatorship.

In 1979 the American worker's average hourly wage was equal to $15.91 (adjusted for inflation in 2001 dollars). By 1989 it had reached only $16.63/hour. That's a gain of only 7 cents a year for the entire Reagan decade. During the great 'boom years' between 1995 and 2000 it rose briefly to $18.33 per hour. In other words, from 1979 to 2000, even before the most recent Bush recession, after more than two decades the American worker's average wages increased on average only 11.5 cents per hour per year! With nearly all of that coming in the five so-called 'boom' years of 1995-2000, and most of that lost once again in the last three years. And that includes for all workers, even those with college degrees.

With 1992 as base year, productivity was at 82.2 in 1979. It grew to 94.2 by 1989 and 116.6 by the year 2000. In the past year, moreover, it has exploded, putting it over 120. That's a nearly 40% increase since Ronald Reagan took office nearly 25 years ago!

The 100 million American workers without college degrees, whose real take home pay today is less than it was 25 years ago, certainly can't be said to have shared in that 40% productivity gain. And the other 20 million or so with college degrees whose pay rose modestly at best certainly shared in very little of that nearly 40% productivity gain.

Considering just the period from 1989 to the present yields an obscene result. The median executive salary (cash pay and bonuses) of American CEOs rose by 79% from 1989 to ;and has continued to accelerate right through the current Bush II recession! And that's only the median. The average CEO cash and direct compensation growth is even higher than 79%.

In other words the American right doesn't care about deficits, and never did. All that talk about debt was just an excuse for attacking Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and food stamps. In other words their fiscal phonys.
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1308 May 30, 2012
TV MAN wrote:
Bruser is a "FOOL" and here is why.
Why I believe the right doesn't care about deficits.
"RESULTS"
Hasn't everyone learned the trickle doesn't trickle?
If it does, show me the proof.
What I do know. Based on IRS studies.
Even if you don't accept these facts, everyone knows the rich are getting richer at a faster pace. Why? Transfer of wealth.
The rich have all the leverage.
Only regulation can stop it.
I don't call this a free market, I call it financial dictatorship.
In 1979 the American worker's average hourly wage was equal to $15.91 (adjusted for inflation in 2001 dollars). By 1989 it had reached only $16.63/hour. That's a gain of only 7 cents a year for the entire Reagan decade. During the great 'boom years' between 1995 and 2000 it rose briefly to $18.33 per hour. In other words, from 1979 to 2000, even before the most recent Bush recession, after more than two decades the American worker's average wages increased on average only 11.5 cents per hour per year! With nearly all of that coming in the five so-called 'boom' years of 1995-2000, and most of that lost once again in the last three years. And that includes for all workers, even those with college degrees.
With 1992 as base year, productivity was at 82.2 in 1979. It grew to 94.2 by 1989 and 116.6 by the year 2000. In the past year, moreover, it has exploded, putting it over 120. That's a nearly 40% increase since Ronald Reagan took office nearly 25 years ago!
The 100 million American workers without college degrees, whose real take home pay today is less than it was 25 years ago, certainly can't be said to have shared in that 40% productivity gain. And the other 20 million or so with college degrees whose pay rose modestly at best certainly shared in very little of that nearly 40% productivity gain.
Considering just the period from 1989 to the present yields an obscene result. The median executive salary (cash pay and bonuses) of American CEOs rose by 79% from 1989 to ;and has continued to accelerate right through the current Bush II recession! And that's only the median. The average CEO cash and direct compensation growth is even higher than 79%.
In other words the American right doesn't care about deficits, and never did. All that talk about debt was just an excuse for attacking Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and food stamps. In other words their fiscal phonys.
Take it easy TV Man, Watch your Blood Pressure! I guess the Truth Hurst, and you can not contain yourself.TBSS
TV MAN

United States

#1310 May 30, 2012
Bruser wrote:
<quoted text>
Take it easy TV Man, Watch your Blood Pressure! I guess the Truth Hurst, and you can not contain yourself.TBSS
Explain with results how trickle down theorys work. Then tell us the Republican plan to address per-conditions and life time caps. Tell us how the top 1% became owners of 70% of American assets. Show results to back your opinion. If you can't one must assume your opinions are possible lies.
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1311 Jun 1, 2012
"None dare call it MURDER"

This Democrats Defeat Bill to Ban Sex-Selection Abortions


This is shocking news! It is incredible that such a travesty could actually occur in the USA!

Democrats in the House of Representatives prevented passage of a bill that would ban sex-selection abortions. The legislation needed a two-thirds vote and Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the legislation after President Barack Obama and Planned Parenthood came out in opposition.

With a 246-168 vote, the bill did not obtain the two-thirds majority necessary to pass. Republicans voted for the bill on a 226-7 margin while Democrats opposed banning sex-selection abortions on 161-20 vote margin.

The bill would make it a federal offense to knowingly do any one of the following four things:(1) perform an abortion, at any time in pregnancy,“knowing that such abortion is sought based on the sex or gender of the child”; (2) use “force or threat of force... for the purpose of coercing a sex-selection abortion”; (3) solicit or accept funds to perform a sex-selection abortion; or (4) transport a woman into the U.S. or across state lines for this purpose. However, the bill says “A woman upon whom a sex-selection abortion is performed may not be prosecuted or held civilly liable for any violation ...”

The bill also specifically states,“Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require that a healthcare provider has an affirmative duty to inquire as to the motivation for the abortion, absent the healthcare provider having knowledge or information that the abortion is being sought based on the sex or gender of the child.”

Those Democrats, and Republicans who have perpetuating these MURDERS, will Burn In Hell!
Chuck

Amityville, NY

#1312 Jun 1, 2012
Bruser wrote:
"None dare call it MURDER"
This Democrats Defeat Bill to Ban Sex-Selection Abortions
This is shocking news! It is incredible that such a travesty could actually occur in the USA!
Democrats in the House of Representatives prevented passage of a bill that would ban sex-selection abortions. The legislation needed a two-thirds vote and Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the legislation after President Barack Obama and Planned Parenthood came out in opposition.
With a 246-168 vote, the bill did not obtain the two-thirds majority necessary to pass. Republicans voted for the bill on a 226-7 margin while Democrats opposed banning sex-selection abortions on 161-20 vote margin.
The bill would make it a federal offense to knowingly do any one of the following four things:(1) perform an abortion, at any time in pregnancy,“knowing that such abortion is sought based on the sex or gender of the child”; (2) use “force or threat of force... for the purpose of coercing a sex-selection abortion”; (3) solicit or accept funds to perform a sex-selection abortion; or (4) transport a woman into the U.S. or across state lines for this purpose. However, the bill says “A woman upon whom a sex-selection abortion is performed may not be prosecuted or held civilly liable for any violation ...”
The bill also specifically states,“Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require that a healthcare provider has an affirmative duty to inquire as to the motivation for the abortion, absent the healthcare provider having knowledge or information that the abortion is being sought based on the sex or gender of the child.”
Those Democrats, and Republicans who have perpetuating these MURDERS, will Burn In Hell!
Seems like Bruser is already in his own hell.
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1313 Jun 1, 2012
TV MAN wrote:
<quoted text>Explain with results how trickle down theorys work. Then tell us the Republican plan to address per-conditions and life time caps. Tell us how the top 1% became owners of 70% of American assets. Show results to back your opinion. If you can't one must assume your opinions are possible lies.
I try not to upset sick old people, so promise not to get upset, or raise your blood pressure, as it would bother me if you get ill from my answer as I am a Christian.

Answer:
Who creates more jobs? The top 1% or the bottom 1%?
See that people call you an idiot, and even you come up with the right answer= The top 1%.
BTW, I love how you pick and choose what posts you will answer, and ignore the Obuma posts. Guess you too are distancing yourself from "The Loser"!
Oh TV don't read my next post, it proves how the Abortionists, now are using that to have the sex of the child by Murdering those that are not the right sex they want. Next up, the Obuma govt will force those people over a certain age to be "euthanized" for their own good, after being advised by their "Death Panel" that everyone on Medicare must meet with every 6 months to tell them what medications they should be taking and what medications the Government will not cover, and their options for "Euthanasia".
Hey "heart problem TV Man", I guess that wouldn't bother you as you claim to have a health plan that you have enough money to purchase. Good for you!Too bad for those that can not do that!
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1314 Jun 1, 2012
"None dare call it MURDER"

This Democrats Defeat Bill to Ban Sex-Selection Abortions

This is shocking news! It is incredible that such a travesty could actually occur in the USA!

Democrats in the House of Representatives prevented passage of a bill that would ban sex-selection abortions. The legislation needed a two-thirds vote and Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the legislation after President Barack Obama and Planned Parenthood came out in opposition.

With a 246-168 vote, the bill did not obtain the two-thirds majority necessary to pass. Republicans voted for the bill on a 226-7 margin while Democrats opposed banning sex-selection abortions on 161-20 vote margin.

The bill would make it a federal offense to knowingly do any one of the following four things:(1) perform an abortion, at any time in pregnancy,“knowing that such abortion is sought based on the sex or gender of the child”; (2) use “force or threat of force... for the purpose of coercing a sex-selection abortion”; (3) solicit or accept funds to perform a sex-selection abortion; or (4) transport a woman into the U.S. or across state lines for this purpose. However, the bill says “A woman upon whom a sex-selection abortion is performed may not be prosecuted or held civilly liable for any violation ...”

The bill also specifically states,“Nothing in this Act shall be construed to require that a healthcare provider has an affirmative duty to inquire as to the motivation for the abortion, absent the healthcare provider having knowledge or information that the abortion is being sought based on the sex or gender of the child.”

Those Democrats, and Republicans who have perpetuating these MURDERS, will Burn In Hell!
Bruser

Massapequa, NY

#1316 Jun 2, 2012
Watch out "Planned Parenthood", the govt may shut down your money!!!Are you now saying that a "Fetus"
is a person, and that Abortion is "MURDER?"

Planned Parenthood admits fetus is human lifeTuesday, May 29, 2012 at 6:29 PM EDT

by Dan Andros

Planned Parenthood wants you to know that they are horrified by the actions of an ‘entry level’ staffer who was caught on undercover camera coaching a client to abuse Medicaid and get a late term abortion solely based on gender preference:

“Planned Parenthood condemns sex selection motivated by gender bias, and urges leaders to challenge the underlying conditions that lead to these beliefs and practices, including addressing the social, legal, economic, and political conditions that promote gender bias and lead some to value one gender over the other.”

“Gender bias is contrary to everything our organization works for daily in communities across the country. Planned Parenthood opposes racism and sexism in all forms, and we work to advance equity and human rights in the delivery of health care,”

Do the folks at Planned Parenthood realize how ridiculous they sound? Here’s an organization that has no problem confidently defending their role in the murder of over 300,000 unborn babies each and every year (while facilitating less than 1,000 adoptions). But they go in full-fledged PR panic mode over fears the latest videos could possibly portray them as having a gender bias? Oh, the horror! Sure, dead babies are being stacked outside the office – but damned if we’ll let them say we favored one sex over the other!

Also, I thought Planned Parenthood believes the fetus in the womb is just a blob of cells, not a human life. Their website says life begins at first breath

The really hot question is,“When does being a person begin?” Most medical authorities and Planned Parenthood agree that it starts when a baby takes its first breath.

Here’s what I’d love to know: how can you have gender bias against a blob of cells? Caught in their own silly game of political correctness, it seems Planned Parenthood may have unwittingly admitted a fetus is a human life. How is aborting what they’ve now admitted is either a male or a female (aka a ‘person’) not murder?
TV MAN

United States

#1317 Jun 3, 2012
Bruser wrote:
<quoted text>
I try not to upset sick old people, so promise not to get upset, or raise your blood pressure, as it would bother me if you get ill from my answer as I am a Christian.
Answer:
Who creates more jobs? The top 1% or the bottom 1%?
See that people call you an idiot, and even you come up with the right answer= The top 1%.
BTW, I love how you pick and choose what posts you will answer, and ignore the Obuma posts. Guess you too are distancing yourself from "The Loser"!
Oh TV don't read my next post, it proves how the Abortionists, now are using that to have the sex of the child by Murdering those that are not the right sex they want. Next up, the Obuma govt will force those people over a certain age to be "euthanized" for their own good, after being advised by their "Death Panel" that everyone on Medicare must meet with every 6 months to tell them what medications they should be taking and what medications the Government will not cover, and their options for "Euthanasia".
Hey "heart problem TV Man", I guess that wouldn't bother you as you claim to have a health plan that you have enough money to purchase. Good for you!Too bad for those that can not do that!
Heart problem solved, thank you very much. A-feb is gone. Ejection fraction over 50% and moving up. Influenza was the problem, not a bad heart. The med's worked, and I'm back to normal. However your speculation is still comical. You're giving one percent more credit then they deserve. Eighty five percent of jobs are created by small business. The top one percent own the leverage. Meaning they extort small business. Forty three percent of the non-insured, became that way from choice. They've confused their priorities. People with insurance could care less about the mandate, their already paying. The truly poor have government assistance. The real problems are pre-conditions, and life time caps. Even if you can afford insurance, you'll be turned down. What's your plan for these people, "Free Markets". We've had that. Tell the Republicans it doesn't work. Health care is a different animal. Free Markets require money for service. Once free service becomes available, "Free Markets", go down with the ship.
TV MAN

United States

#1318 Jun 3, 2012
Bruser wrote:
Watch out "Planned Parenthood", the govt may shut down your money!!!Are you now saying that a "Fetus"
is a person, and that Abortion is "MURDER?"
Planned Parenthood admits fetus is human lifeTuesday, May 29, 2012 at 6:29 PM EDT
by Dan Andros
Planned Parenthood wants you to know that they are horrified by the actions of an ‘entry level’ staffer who was caught on undercover camera coaching a client to abuse Medicaid and get a late term abortion solely based on gender preference:
“Planned Parenthood condemns sex selection motivated by gender bias, and urges leaders to challenge the underlying conditions that lead to these beliefs and practices, including addressing the social, legal, economic, and political conditions that promote gender bias and lead some to value one gender over the other.”
“Gender bias is contrary to everything our organization works for daily in communities across the country. Planned Parenthood opposes racism and sexism in all forms, and we work to advance equity and human rights in the delivery of health care,”
Do the folks at Planned Parenthood realize how ridiculous they sound? Here’s an organization that has no problem confidently defending their role in the murder of over 300,000 unborn babies each and every year (while facilitating less than 1,000 adoptions). But they go in full-fledged PR panic mode over fears the latest videos could possibly portray them as having a gender bias? Oh, the horror! Sure, dead babies are being stacked outside the office – but damned if we’ll let them say we favored one sex over the other!
Also, I thought Planned Parenthood believes the fetus in the womb is just a blob of cells, not a human life. Their website says life begins at first breath
The really hot question is,“When does being a person begin?” Most medical authorities and Planned Parenthood agree that it starts when a baby takes its first breath.
Here’s what I’d love to know: how can you have gender bias against a blob of cells? Caught in their own silly game of political correctness, it seems Planned Parenthood may have unwittingly admitted a fetus is a human life. How is aborting what they’ve now admitted is either a male or a female (aka a ‘person’) not murder?
You sound like some little boy that believes in fairy tales. Give us all a break. Im tired of the right wing religious nuts interpreting the bible in their favor. People like you are afraid of the unknown, you make it up as you go. It's time for you and your kind to step aside. You're old school, just like the guy that sold buggy whips. The world is more complicated then you can comprehend. Stop sounding like a little boy with a cell phone to God. Face the truth, it's ok. You don't know sh-t.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Massapequa Park Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Garbage pail scavengers in levittown 32 min live n let live 3
Suspect named in Gilgo Beach murders (Dec '12) 6 hr Streetrunner 10
Backstreet Boys, New Kids on the Block team for... (Nov '10) 6 hr TheAfroHedgehog 7
Swift Named Principal at Our Lady of Lourdes (Aug '09) 8 hr Bruser 2,299
NY Who do you support for Governor in New York in ... (Oct '10) 8 hr postcranium 6,469
Amityville Music Selection (Oct '12) Tue Musikologist 9
NY Who do you support for Attorney General in New ... (Oct '10) Tue NAVYVET 760

Related Media

Massapequa Park Jobs

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]