Health Care Debate - Grand Rapids, MI

Change is good . . . current system benefits all but the one's that need it. .

Big O wrote:

Change is good ... current system benefits all but the one's that need it..

Agreed change is sometimes good. Not always. Change solely for the sake of change is rarely good. Most reasonable people will agree that the current health care system needs reform but the majority of Americans also agree that the current proposed bill is not the way to go about it.

say what wrote:

<quoted text>
Agreed change is sometimes good. Not always. Change solely for the sake of change is rarely good. Most reasonable people will agree that the current health care system needs reform but the majority of Americans also agree that the current proposed bill is not the way to go about it.

Very reasonable post, unless your an America hating socialist. Majority rule is good with the socialist until they are losing on an issue.

Too much government control for a FREE Republic.

too invasive too pervasive too costly too much government too socialistic

too invasive too pervasive too costly too much government too socialistic . . . how about unconstitutional

bobolinq wrote:

too invasive too pervasive too costly too much government too socialistic ... how about unconstitutional

What constitution? The one that the socialist hate so much they are trying to destroy it, and many in the country haven't ever read or care about? That Constitution?

I have a question. Under the constitution we have certain rights. Under that same constitution do we not have certain RESPONSIBLITIES? I the answer is yes then what are they?

The 'bills' as they are now will bankrupt this country. Yes we need reform, yes something needs to be done, but forcing people to buy health insurance and taxing businesses are NOT the answer.

LMAO!!!!!

I clicked the button once.. I swear I did!

There's too many gray areas, i.e., illegal immigrants being covered, abortion being covered. I don't want my hard earned tax dollars paying for these services. President Obama is hell bent on passing this, even though most Americans are against it. Can you say dictatorship?

Momma Marie wrote:

I have a question. Under the constitution we have certain rights. Under that same constitution do we not have certain RESPONSIBLITIES? I the answer is yes then what are they?

To not burden your fellow citizen, or compromise his/her pursuit of happiness by taking responsibility for yourself. Most importantly, hold your elected officials responsible by insuring they follow the rules commonly known as the CONSTITUTION!

Obskeptic wrote:

<quoted text>
To not burden your fellow citizen, or compromise his/her pursuit of happiness by taking responsibility for yourself. Most importantly, hold your elected officials responsible by insuring they follow the rules commonly known as the CONSTITUTION!

Thank you very well stated in very few words. That about covers it all.

music lover wrote:

There's too many gray areas, i.e., illegal immigrants being covered, abortion being covered. I don't want my hard earned tax dollars paying for these services. President Obama is hell bent on passing this, even though most Americans are against it. Can you say dictatorship?

These are lies being spewed by people who's best interest (money) will not be served if HC is passes. Don't you get it???

Delilah wrote:

<quoted text>
Go back to your job at the insurance company, loser.

And why don't you use your own name?

Oh that's right, it's too easy to steal someone else's name and raise hell on every thread you can't post on.

neecer wrote:

<quoted text>
And why don't you use your own name?
Oh that's right, it's too easy to steal someone else's name and raise hell on every thread you can't post on.

That's right.

Obskeptic wrote:

<quoted text>
What constitution? The one that the socialist hate so much they are trying to destroy it, and many in the country haven't ever read or care about? That Constitution?

I love it, Bush/Cheney peed all over the Constitution for 8 years, Shrub called it just a piece of paper and now you guys found it and want to worship it, of course you want to worship your own twisted version but it is just good that you found it.

GR Pete wrote:

<quoted text>
I love it, Bush/Cheney peed all over the Constitution for 8 years, Shrub called it just a piece of paper and now you guys found it and want to worship it, of course you want to worship your own twisted version but it is just good that you found it.

Actually that lie was perpetrated by some leftist "journalist". Check it out on snopes. There is only one individual, who was not present at the meeting that he was credited for making that remark, who is spreading that lie. I did have a lot of problems with Bush. He did lie. He told us he was a conservative, and he was not.

As long as it contains a Public Option

Why has freedom become a public option?