Gun Laws Debate - Rosemont, IL

must be a us citizen.must paying tax for atleast ten years.no crimnal record.

Only prohibition should be if the person comitted a felony (involving a victim) wirh a weapon.
Outside of this stipulation a person should have the ability to protect themselves with a firearm.
What is it with Chicago, New York City and DC anti-gun laws?
Your crime rates are astronomical, while places that allow carry have much lower rates.
Common sense is no longer common

Ddd wrote:

Only prohibition should be if the person comitted a felony (involving a victim) wirh a weapon.
Outside of this stipulation a person should have the ability to protect themselves with a firearm.
What is it with Chicago, New York City and DC anti-gun laws?
Your crime rates are astronomical, while places that allow carry have much lower rates.
Common sense is no longer common

I agree, I live in Missouri which is open carry in most counties and concealed carry in all counties. Criminals look for easy targets and do not want to be shot at. Mass shootings occur in gun free zones. Never hear of shoot out at a gun range or Cabelas or any gun stores. The anti gunners are very naïve believingbthe police will protect them. Well most law men do the best they can. But when confronted with a threat they just can not get there in time to help. It is our Constitutional right to defend ourselves.

I Conceal Carry, I am a Wife and a Mother and I am Protected!!