|
No longer a victim
Clifton, CO
|
|
|
shooter
Grand Junction, CO
|
when only criminals have guns crime will go up as we can no longer defend ourselves
|
|
Gary Breese
Grand Junction, CO
|
Self defense is the ultimate God given right of a free person.
|
|
“Heat it up beat it up gotta go”
Since: Jan 10
Wait. What?
|
Please wait...
Why is this even a question? Would you support a ban on free speech?
|
|
Pancho
Grand Junction, CO
|
|
|
Dave Rambo
Grand Junction, CO
|
Their are a lot of bad people out there. Our police can not be everywhere all the time.
|
|
al
Grand Junction, CO
|
becaus it is my right to protect my family myself and my home
|
|
little bushs buddy
Grand Junction, CO
|
Respector wrote: <quoted text> Liberals do. They support approved speech. they also enjoy eating their feces. Way to go Brownie! hehehe
|
|
|
|
Sid
Grand Junction, CO
|
it was the citizens that fought our revolutionary war they where a band of the first US citizens.
Arming Civilians preserves freedom, and keeps enemies from attacking us directly.
So Called Human Rights initiative program gives us a advantage over all other states.
A country Army could not come and try to occupy our city as the majority of people in the USA are Armed and would most likely attack invading armies! The country that tried to occupy the City will get attacked on 2 fronts 1 from the US reserves stationed in most US cities and civilians.
The US Military according our consition will defend US citizens even if they fight back! Also killing civilians is a no no according to the United Nations Human Rights program. This is why US stations civilians in all there bases.
|
|
Sid
Grand Junction, CO
|
without arming civilians we invite police states, controlled by either goverment officials that abuse power our criminal elements that take power. We also open up our country for a military attack on our soil. No way to defend ourselves we loose the one thing many have died for to defend us.
|
|
Jay
Stillwater, OK
|
I would support a ban on psychiatric drugs that affect behavior and registration of private party sales. It's the person, not the tool!
|
|
bigalr
Grand Junction, CO
|
I will not support anything that goes against the constatution of the United States Of America and the second amnment gives me the right to have guns if i chose to so no I would not support the ban
|
|
Rick M
Grand Junction, CO
|
If handguns are banned only the law abiding citizens would turn them in. The areas with the highest crime rate always have the strictest gun control. As more law abiding citizens have axcess to guns the crime rate always drops.
|
|
BobP
Berthoud, CO
|
It's a myth and misconception that the police can protect you, they will show up after the fact and attempt to track down a perp. You are responsible for your own safety.
|
|
steve
Kissimmee, FL
|
A gun is a gun, a piece of metal. It won't kill you.
|
|
bob
Grand Junction, CO
|
the second amendment says "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" or can't you read simple english???
|
|
Law
Bellevue, NE
|
Jay wrote: I would support a ban on psychiatric drugs that affect behavior and registration of private party sales. It's the person, not the tool! Why should private sales be registered? What business is it of the government what I own if I'm not breaking the law by using it?
|
|
student
Grand Junction, CO
|
no matter what we do there will always be gun and criminals killing
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|