Gun Control Debate - Arroyo Grande, CA

When you take a citizens right to defend their home and property away they become subjects and then only the criminals have guns and are free to do as they want. If more people were armed then less fools would do stupid things and I think robberies would go down. There is no clear and simple answer except we need to quit just spanking criminal hands and really get tough with them. Banning guns is not the answer, tougher sentences however are!

The 2nd Amendment... Need I say more... Guns don't kill people, people kill people... If the U.S. were to ban guns then what would they do to people that are trained fighters. Their hands and feet are weapons as well?

heck no I would never be without one,you may as well kiss your butt goodbye, i have been in a situation, where some murderer,came to my ranch to harm me, if I didnt have a gun, i wouldnt be here to tell this story.

hell no!we need guns, to protect ourselves, against the break ins and the criminals, and in this economy, we really need to protect ourselves.

gina rozzio wrote:

hell no!we need guns, to protect ourselves, against the break ins and the criminals, and in this economy, we really need to protect ourselves.

Har har har. We does has the most meth addicts and prostitutes here thans anywer in Californy. Fun huh?

Guns are the difference between people saying "please" and "thank you", or just taking what they want. That is what is meant by the quote, "An armed society is a civil society."