Gay Marriage Debate - Orlando, FL

It goes against nature and children shouldn't be taught to think its natural...Male + Female = Children...Male + Male = no children = Not natural, goes against nature...female + female = no children, not natural, goes against nature...And before someone calls me a "bible thumper", I'm a non believer...

Because when God created the world GOD created man and for his companion a woman.

Two consenting adults that wish to spend their lives together?
No problem.

Wrong

Adam and Steve = no results

Adam and Steve can adopt crackhead Eve's baby and give the child a good home.

Obummer wrote:

It goes against nature and children shouldn't be taught to think its natural...Male + Female = Children...Male + Male = no children = Not natural, goes against nature...female + female = no children, not natural, goes against nature...And before someone calls me a "bible thumper", I'm a non believer...

Here's a big surprise for you. It is possible for Male + Female to NOT result in children!! Not every straight person feels the need to be a breeder. Why on earth would you care who someone else loves? What on earth makes it your business? Of course we should have gay marriage, the civil rights of gays have been trampled upon for far too long. And for those of you who disapprove of being gay (and are so ignorant that you don't realize that it is NOT a choice that they make), just mind your own damn business. No one's going to force you to marry someone of your own gender.

Tired of Silly wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's a big surprise for you. It is possible for Male + Female to NOT result in children!! Not every straight person feels the need to be a breeder. Why on earth would you care who someone else loves? What on earth makes it your business? Of course we should have gay marriage, the civil rights of gays have been trampled upon for far too long. And for those of you who disapprove of being gay (and are so ignorant that you don't realize that it is NOT a choice that they make), just mind your own damn business. No one's going to force you to marry someone of your own gender.

One thing I can agree with Crabby Pants about.

Tired of Silly wrote:

<quoted text>
Here's a big surprise for you. It is possible for Male + Female to NOT result in children!! Not every straight person feels the need to be a breeder. Why on earth would you care who someone else loves? What on earth makes it your business? Of course we should have gay marriage, the civil rights of gays have been trampled upon for far too long. And for those of you who disapprove of being gay (and are so ignorant that you don't realize that it is NOT a choice that they make), just mind your own damn business. No one's going to force you to marry someone of your own gender.

It goes against nature...There is a reason nature created male and female...Whether a male and female couple chooses to have children or not at least the choice is there...

Obummer wrote:

<quoted text>
It goes against nature...There is a reason nature created male and female...Whether a male and female couple chooses to have children or not at least the choice is there...

Can we agree then that men can marry seahorses? The male seahorse births their young

Obummer wrote:

It goes against nature and children shouldn't be taught to think its natural...Male + Female = Children...Male + Male = no children = Not natural, goes against nature...female + female = no children, not natural, goes against nature...And before someone calls me a "bible thumper", I'm a non believer...

What goes against nature is people telling other people what they can or can't do-

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness...

Hans Delbruck wrote:

<quoted text>
Can we agree then that men can marry seahorses? The male seahorse births their young

No, we can't agree...Seahorses should mate with seahorses, not male homo sapiens...Try keeping the discussion relevant to the species of the topic at hand...

sanka wrote:

Adam and Steve can adopt crackhead Eve's baby and give the child a good home.

And a bent mind scarred for life!

yes

Obummer wrote:

<quoted text>
No, we can't agree...Seahorses should mate with seahorses, not male homo sapiens...Try keeping the discussion relevant to the species of the topic at hand...

The topic at hand is nauseating- Who gives you the right to obstruct other peoples personal life?

You may live in a bubble, but the whole world doesn't. Leave people be, worry about your own life and marriage.

At one time I was a liar a theif sexually Immoral and an Idolater. Is it any wonder why the world is so wicked! But thanks be to God who delivered me from error to the true, from spiritual death to life and I pray the Lord would reveal this to anyone not satisfied with less than Jesus best for
their life.

Nathan wrote:

At one time I was a liar a theif sexually Immoral and an Idolater. Is it any wonder why the world is so wicked! But thanks be to God who delivered me from error to the true, from spiritual death to life and I pray the Lord would reveal this to anyone not satisfied with less than Jesus best for
their life.

Nurse Ratchet, Nathan is acting up again...

Hans Delbruck wrote:

<quoted text>
Nurse Ratchet, Nathan is acting up again...

I'm a nurse, but Nathan's diagnosis appears to be "hopelessly insane". Nothing we can do for him.

Look, here is the thing. I am all about freedom and liberty. Each individual has the freedom to do what they want as long as it is within reason of the law. There is nothing in our constitution (federal or state) that prohibits same sex marriage. With that said, how can we as people deny someone else the constitutional right to, "pursuit of happiness". We can't plain and simple.

Now ppl who want to ban gay marriage because they do not support homosexuality is usually biased to the church. As thomas Paine once said, "All national institutions of churches, whether Christian, Jewish, or Turkish, appear to me as human inventions to enslave mankind for power and profit."

Now think about that statement. It is mainly the church passing their ideals and beliefs of religion on to young developing minds and basically molding people. These beliefs on homosexuality are also passed through the religious systems. So again think of the statement. To enslave mankind or i.e. to control mankind. Banning same sex marriages is the same as controling people that happen to be gay.