Gay Marriage Debate - Arvada, CO

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
Society is a subjective term? Interesting…
But… even the Greeks didn’t define the gay relationship with the term marriage. So, it seems I am not the one confused. What Colorado is attempting with civil unions for gays is appropriate.

You've missed my ENTIRE point....I'm done with this conversation, you will ALWAYS believe the government needs to be involved. All I can hope for is the sheep like you will get led to slaughter long before us wolves.

Truth Addict wrote:

<quoted text>You've missed my ENTIRE point....I'm done with this conversation, you will ALWAYS believe the government needs to be involved. All I can hope for is the sheep like you will get led to slaughter long before us wolves.

Take the government out… Gays will NOT get married because the nature of marriage doesn’t fit the gay relationship. But it is what it is…
I am not worried especially if all the wolves are like you.

If the government is out of the loop, then it will be whatever they want to call it...if you seriously can't see that...wow.
If there is NO CONTROLLING AGENCY involved in the contract, then they can define the contract HOWEVER they want.
They can define marriage IN THE CONTRACT...are you a lawyer or do you know one? Definitions are not set in stone if the term is SPECIFICALLY DEFINED in the contract.
Trust me, I'm right...and you are still a tard.

Truth Addict wrote:

If the government is out of the loop, then it will be whatever they want to call it...if you seriously can't see that...wow.
If there is NO CONTROLLING AGENCY involved in the contract, then they can define the contract HOWEVER they want.
They can define marriage IN THE CONTRACT...are you a lawyer or do you know one? Definitions are not set in stone if the term is SPECIFICALLY DEFINED in the contract.
Trust me, I'm right...and you are still a tard.

They could define it as that, however, they would not. The definition of marriage has always encompassed the relations between a man and a woman; never same-sex. BUT!!! Since the government is involved, it isn’t appropriate to re-define marriage to fit the gay relationship, and that’s for the benefit of SOCIETY.

You are wrong.