Civil Unions Debate - Columbus, OH

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
your fantasy is about to be shreaded.
52% of the population anywhere is not gay. even in san francisco.
it is you lieing.

MarleneBomer wrote:

Tony -- The disapproval rate on interracial marriage nationally just before the Loving case began was at *four percent*! It wasn't until the Gallup poll of *1997* did the approval rate go above *fifty* percent!
"Reality" my dear ignorant, indoctrinated fool, the Constitution does not *care* what the approval of the majority is, because it was NOT written for *them*!

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Your error is in assuming that only gay people would vote against the ban. That was the ACTUAL VOTE. 52% to 48%.
Not "95% against it" as you claimed.

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Your error is in assuming that only gay people would vote against the ban. That was the ACTUAL VOTE. 52% to 48%.
Not "95% against it" as you claimed.

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
hey cupcake
if you could grasp what you read, my claim was more than 95% of the population was not gay. In recent measures it was over 99% straight that answered questionaires.
1% does not even measure up as a special interest.

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
hey cupcake
if you could grasp what you read, my claim was more than 95% of the population was not gay.

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
excuse me cupcake
in Ohio they already voted.....multiple times
now there is a constitutional admendment

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
What you said was that 95% of the population was on your side (i.e. against gay marriage). Even the highest state (Mississippi) was only 86% against. Liar AND coward... figures.

MarleneBomer wrote:

"Reality" -- once again, you ignorant fool, the Constitution does not f*ing *care* about the number a minority is -- their rights are protected!
If you can't fathom that, darling, the your "reality" is totally delusional, as usual.

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Which in time will be invalidated by the SCOTUS. Then you'll have to get your buddies to go kill some judges.

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
sorry to show fact, that clouds your fantasy as a lie.
Post #588 & #594 reads differently from your spinning lie.
figures.
all the left is, is a big lie

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
my side is 95% of the population cupcake

TonyD2 wrote:

<quoted text>
Never voted Democrat in my life.
Read #594 again, funny how you suddenly can't comprehend what you wrote. Trying to change the meaning AFTER you get caught lying.
I said "your side is going down." and you responded:
<quoted text>
Which was a response to "your side is going down".

MarleneBomer wrote:

Brian, darling.... what part of the Fourteenth Amendment do you NOT understand, you imbecile?
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection...

MarleneBomer wrote:

Brian, darling.... what part of the Fourteenth Amendment do you NOT understand, you imbecile? "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Protection...