Look, it may be OBVIOUS to us she was involved, but the LAW still say one has to be PROVEN GUILTY. And that means one of the following, WHO, WHEN, HOW, WHERE and most intelligent jurys like to have a reason WHY.
Dont even say its because the baby was "beginning to talk, because thats just ridiculous. We ALL know that kids start speaking in FULL sentences by the age of 3.and my kids were able to have complete conversations at that age. But somehow Kaley was stupid and didnt start talking until AFTER she turned 3? Come on.
Look, I know she was at the very least negligent and probably left her in the car (hotter than hell in Florida in June, by the way) and the baby probably suffocated. But that doesn't prove INTENT.
Yes, she walked.......but that wasnt the jurys fault. It was the prosecutors, he should have gone for manslaughter and other charges such as neglect, etc.
Thank God for ALL of us that we live in an age where we have intelligent juries. And if anything, we should learn that perp walks and TVs in the courtroom create nothing but side shows and we MUST grow up.