|
Owl-boy Foolishness
Pittsburgh, PA
|
MrOwl wrote: whatever, genius!!! Clarence Thomas, now there is a real man, an honest to goodness, dyed in the wool AMERICAN, one who can come from humble beginnings, lay aside all the bull and bs about America being the land of repression and make something of HIMSELF. Aye, It does me heart good to know there are still such people in this fair land. Like Lee Greenwood sings, Proud to be an American. Like the mother of Lily Isaacs said, I'm proud to be an American. To think a Pole can survive the Nazi extermination camps, become a naturalised American citizen, it gives we people hope in the land of the free and home of the brave. To think a person with the name Nyugen can survive a boat trip through Thai and Cambodian pirates, live in a camp in Malaysia, come to America, become a naturalised, successful, AMERICAN businessperson, go back to the land of their birth and help people, that is REAL AMERICA. GOD BLESS AMERICA!!! Clarence Thomas is a "real man," eh? Do you take that from his exploits, as described by Anita Hill, during his confirmation hearings? I never doubted his success... just his qualifications and his judicial temperment. The man rarely offers a question in oral arguments, and is probably the most rigidly conservative member of the court, so I can see his appeal for you.
|
|
MrOwl
Greensboro, NC
|
Yes, Clarence Thomas is a real man, even though the real woman, Anita Hill, who probably has never told a lie in her life, even though Lady Hill described him as whatever it is she described him as, if Clarence Thomas did what Lady Hill said he did, why does that matter when a president of the United States can have nonsex BJs in the White House. Hmmm, some Americans have double standards? How can that be? His being rigidly conservative causes you to see his appeal to me. I suppose my love of American Constitutionalism makes me a kook in your sight, correct? You are not rigidly set in your convictions and beliefs, Correct? Out of the three I mentioned, Clarence Thomas, Lily Isaac's mother and Nyugen, you mention the judge but not the other two. Any special reason or is it nunyah for me? Auf Wiedersehn and Shalom!!!
|
|
Owl-boy Foolishness
Pittsburgh, PA
|
MrOwl wrote: Yes, Clarence Thomas is a real man, even though the real woman, Anita Hill, who probably has never told a lie in her life, even though Lady Hill described him as whatever it is she described him as, if Clarence Thomas did what Lady Hill said he did, why does that matter when a president of the United States can have nonsex BJs in the White House. Hmmm, some Americans have double standards? How can that be? His being rigidly conservative causes you to see his appeal to me. I suppose my love of American Constitutionalism makes me a kook in your sight, correct? You are not rigidly set in your convictions and beliefs, Correct? Out of the three I mentioned, Clarence Thomas, Lily Isaac's mother and Nyugen, you mention the judge but not the other two. Any special reason or is it nunyah for me? Auf Wiedersehn and Shalom!!! Yo, bubba! Clinton's affair was CONSENUAL; Thomas' was NOT. BIG difference there, sonny! So much for the respectful and genteel Southern gentleman.
|
|
MrOwl
Greensboro, NC
|
Do you go so far as to say there's a rapist on the Supreme Court? So much for the respectful genteel Southern gentleman must be William Jefferson Blythe Clinton. Hope Arkansas is in the South and he most certainly is a gentleman. Extramarital consensual affairs in the White House is the right and privilege of the president, correct? I can't wait for more of your deep intellect oozing over the internet. Tell us, how could a girl disrespect the wishes of her president. I guarantee you he or anyone else won't use their powers, presidential or otherwise, to overcome one of our womenfolk. Edmonds, Oklahoma!!!
|
|
Owl-boy Foolishness
Pittsburgh, PA
|
Well, now, have you no real or substantive and direct response to my point? Thought not! So an adult female cannot resist the "powerful man?" Can you not understand that very aura of power can be be the actual substance of the attraction? Again, without coercion, that is the woman's choice. Obviously, you archaic antebellum value set blinds you to the reality of the modern world.
Can't wait to see what today's primary circus in your neighboring state to the south will yield... it will undoubtedly be most amusing outcome, and how can it not, considering the lame slate of candidates offered them.
|
|
MrOwl
Greensboro, NC
|
You got it, foolishness, my words are unreal, unsubstantive and indirect. The very aura of your power, wit, charisma and charm surely outshines the sun and the Son!!! archaic, antebellum, thank you for the compliments. I know, in your universe, none of the lame slate of candidates can compete with the lame slate of candidate your side offers. You and your kind love socialism more than American Constitutionalism, and that's FACT!!!
|
|
Owl-boy Foolishness
Pittsburgh, PA
|
Well, as it's said, a man's gotta know his limitations, so you're on the right track, but the crack about the "Son" is a bit sacrilegious for my taste, though. And in the presidential contest, which was the topic at hand, the Democrats have no "slate of candidates".... Obama is our candidate! And only an extreme right-wing whack-jobs "love" ideologies.
|
|
MrOwl
Greensboro, NC
|
The inclusion of the "SON" in the statement may be a bit sacrilegious for your taste but when I face HIM at the end of this road, what you think or thought will NOT be discussed. I'll face nobody's record but MY OWN. I realise there is hardly ever a slate of candidates running against an incumbent but the important word is the one you injected, lame, in describing slate. Ideology-a body of doctrine. In case you haven't noticed the left wing has a body of doctrine, voila, an ideology. How quaint!!! The left wing "love" their ideology. Chini Hindi Bye, Bye!!!
|
|
|
|
Owl-boy Foolishness
Pittsburgh, PA
|
MrOwl wrote: The inclusion of the "SON" in the statement may be a bit sacrilegious for your taste but when I face HIM at the end of this road, what you think or thought will NOT be discussed. I'll face nobody's record but MY OWN. I realise there is hardly ever a slate of candidates running against an incumbent but the important word is the one you injected, lame, in describing slate. Ideology-a body of doctrine. In case you haven't noticed the left wing has a body of doctrine, voila, an ideology. How quaint!!! The left wing "love" their ideology. Chini Hindi Bye, Bye!!! The only "HIM" you'll face will have horns, a tail and a pitchfork... and it'll be warm even to your Southern sensibilities!
|
|
Since: Nov 11
Jacksonville, FL
|
Please wait...
An Observation wrote: There won't be much left of Mr. Cain for the voters' to reject after Mrs. Cain is through with himthis week end! The public embarrassment to her is the most regrettable aspect of his canidacy, but then I don't believe Cain ever thought he get to the point where he'd be subject to the level of scrutiny of the front runner. Hmmmf!!! Very true, but what a man does whith call girls, tricks, escorts, etc, should always remain confidential becuase those girls get paid or get other favors and benefits. I'm sure his mistress got those things outta the deal. For any woman who got paid somehow out of the dealing to then later come out and talk against that man - though she put herself out there to sleep around as a form of business to get benefits and/or make money, those girls are dead wrong. Take Tiger Woods - on a normal basis those women would not have slept with Tiger - but they did it becuase of who he is and the money they got paid or was promised to get paid. But once the payment was done those women had no right to slander their client's name and his personal and professional life outside of dealing with her on a mutual agreement business level. I see if these men of power did these things to these women without the women's consent - like rape enlighteningthemind.com enlighteningthemind radio
|
|
An Observation
Pittsburgh, PA
|
Chris J Johnson wrote: <quoted text> Hmmmf!!! Very true, but what a man does whith call girls, tricks, escorts, etc, should always remain confidential becuase those girls get paid or get other favors and benefits. I'm sure his mistress got those things outta the deal. For any woman who got paid somehow out of the dealing to then later come out and talk against that man - though she put herself out there to sleep around as a form of business to get benefits and/or make money, those girls are dead wrong. Take Tiger Woods - on a normal basis those women would not have slept with Tiger - but they did it becuase of who he is and the money they got paid or was promised to get paid. But once the payment was done those women had no right to slander their client's name and his personal and professional life outside of dealing with her on a mutual agreement business level. I see if these men of power did these things to these women without the women's consent - like rape enlighteningthemind.com enlighteningthemind radio An interesting perspective, but Mr. Cain seeks national political leadership under the GOP's banner... home of the ultra-conservative "values voters"... but, then how can we explain Newt Gingrich?
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|