Abortion Debate - Nashville, TN

LOL >implying that a fetus that is nonviable outside the uterus is cognizant.

Study human reproduction much?

Comprehend English much?

Your usage of "disingenuous" is retarded.

Your romantic idea that getting rid of the potential for a fetus to fully develop is a monstrous thing prevents you from being objective. Would I have wanted that to happen to me? Speaking as someone who is actually alive and capable of thought, no. If it had actually happened to me? No one would have been harmed. I wouldn't have. At the time, I would have been a mass of cells incapable of any independent thought/will/action.

I'm sorry that your ridiculous attempt to try to make me put myself in the shoes of a fetus failed.

When should abortion be legal?
i dont know but today is Aldolph Hitlers birthday

Fifth,

Study human reproductive biology, my friend.

You and the rest of humanity was an incognizant bunch of cells at some point because, as you willfully ignore, that's the only way a human becomes cognizant.

That inconizant bunch of cells was you. Doesn't matter whether you knew it or not. Not the argument, as you knew.

Willful ignorance much?

Please take your brain for a walk outside of the Democratic Party/Planned Baby Murder/George Soros library.

You're a really stupid person. No one is denying that a fetus with no nervous system whatsoever eventually becomes a developed human. But until that point where a relatively functional nervous system is present, there is no "life" harmed. The "potential" is harmed, which is inherently quite different.