Oct 25, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger
Full story: Springfield News Leader![]()
Read
Comments
|
The right to a healthy workplace. It is the responsibility of the employer to provide a safe and healthy environment for its employees. While many workers choose to work in workplaces that permit smoking, others may prefer not to be around smoke but persist because they need the employment. A smoking ban opponent may simply say,“work somewhere without smoke,” yet I would argue that your insistence on smoking in public is not as important as that employee’s health and livelihood. Smokers’ unwillingness to control their urges should not force people to change jobs in the name of personal health and welfare.
|
||||
|
There's another thread in the forum on this same topic. It is full of people ignoring the premise that the voters will have the say on whether this approach takes effect.
That way, they can feel free to bombard us all with their "damn that governmental interference in the convenience of my fix" vitriol and pretend they are making sense. |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
29 min | Tom | 1414 |
|
|
32 min | Sheri | 855 |
|
|
1 hr | HONEST MAN | 15 |
|
|
2 hr | ohrc | 2486 |
|
|
2 hr | Mrs Beasley | 51687 |
|
|
3 hr | Pesky army | 6 |
|
|
3 hr | Confederate1989 | 10 |