Local News: Ghent, KY 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

Oct 4, 2009 | Posted by: roboblogger

2 government studies find autism disorders in 1 in 100 U.S. children

Full story: Edmonton Sun

Two new government studies indicate about 1 in 100 American children have autism disorders - higher than a previous U.S. estimate of 1 in 150.

Read All 20 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of20
raymond

Montreal, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Oct 5, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

In a couple of years this autism rate it would be 1 in 50.

As federal health agencies avoid searching the true cause due to possible public outcry.
MAJOR Mal

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Oct 8, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The forcast may be 1 in 11 by 2017
Joshua

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Oct 9, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

That is true. The CDC is covering their heads in the sand.

With all their propaganda, they are trying very hard with their puppets psychologists to diffuse the autism statistics. However the numbers talk for themselves.

Vaccines Induce Autism. There is no doubt any more.
Sweetlucyd

Maple Shade, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Oct 10, 2009
 
The national autism research project has begun. They are going to evaluate 12000 expectant mothers who already have a child with autism. The results wont be in until 2019...
The mother will provide hair, blood and urine samples throughout her pregnancy and the baby will be evaluated until age 3.

come share your story with me... www.yourtribenow.com

“I am just me!”

Since: Feb 08

Brenton Now

ISP: Glen Fork, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Oct 16, 2009
 
I don't need a study I have done a experiment of my own. I have two children that are Autistic, a 9 year old boy and 5 year old girl. They have all immunizations. I also have a 1 year old little girl whom has never been immunized. At the age of one she is responding to her name, familiar voices and people. Tries to respond verbally. Great eye contact, loves to play and interact. When in a game such as patty cake or peek a boo she will interact along and when the game stops she initiates by making noise, and clapping hands to get it to continue. As well as many other wonderful things most babies her age are suppose to be doing. I believe that she is fine. What I am doing is not exactly what you would consider a controlled experiment but it seems to satisfy my curiosity for the time being. So any input would be accepted.
Den

High Point, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Oct 21, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

TPiH,
That's not an experiment.
It's unfortunate your children are autistic, but vaccines are not the cause. This has been studied extensively. Not vaccinating your youngest child only puts her (and other children) at risk of disease.

Since: Jan 07

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Oct 21, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Regressive autism can show up at any time prior to the age of 3 and it's hard to see signs of autism in a one year old generally anyway for some kids. For some kids like mine, autism was apparent at birth and as an infant where as some other kids it isn't noticed until the child enters daycare. Not all kids have developmental delays, either until the regress.

This is not to say your third child will have autism, or that vaccines is not the cause however when considering genetics, every born child doesn't always end up with the genetic disorder either. I've met parents whose first child had all vaccines and had autism, their second child the did not vaccinate and that child still had autism as well. This of course has no medical reasoning to explain this, or does it for you.
Take Pride in History wrote:
I don't need a study I have done a experiment of my own. I have two children that are Autistic, a 9 year old boy and 5 year old girl. They have all immunizations. I also have a 1 year old little girl whom has never been immunized. At the age of one she is responding to her name, familiar voices and people. Tries to respond verbally. Great eye contact, loves to play and interact. When in a game such as patty cake or peek a boo she will interact along and when the game stops she initiates by making noise, and clapping hands to get it to continue. As well as many other wonderful things most babies her age are suppose to be doing. I believe that she is fine. What I am doing is not exactly what you would consider a controlled experiment but it seems to satisfy my curiosity for the time being. So any input would be accepted.

“I am just me!”

Since: Feb 08

Brenton Now

ISP: Pineville, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Oct 21, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

friend wrote:
Regressive autism can show up at any time prior to the age of 3 and it's hard to see signs of autism in a one year old generally anyway for some kids. For some kids like mine, autism was apparent at birth and as an infant where as some other kids it isn't noticed until the child enters daycare. Not all kids have developmental delays, either until the regress.
This is not to say your third child will have autism, or that vaccines is not the cause however when considering genetics, every born child doesn't always end up with the genetic disorder either. I've met parents whose first child had all vaccines and had autism, their second child the did not vaccinate and that child still had autism as well. This of course has no medical reasoning to explain this, or does it for you.
<quoted text>
I enjoy reading your comments I have read them all. As I stated before I am not saying vaccines are the cause. Or am I saying my 3rd child is not affected all I am saying is that I am seeing what comes about from it. I have already spoke to her pediatrician it is possible to get her caught up later if I choose to do so. You having a autistic child should understand where I am coming from. Know one knows the true cause. I am not saying I am doing right nor am I saying I am doing wrong. Only time will tell I suppose.

“I am just me!”

Since: Feb 08

Brenton Now

ISP: Pineville, WV

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Oct 21, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Den wrote:
TPiH,
That's not an experiment.
It's unfortunate your children are autistic, but vaccines are not the cause. This has been studied extensively. Not vaccinating your youngest child only puts her (and other children) at risk of disease.
I don't know what causes Autism and neither do you. I also do not know if my 3rd child is autistic. What I do know however is that my 3rd child is completely different from my other 2 children. She seems to be unaffected by it. I know as others have stated it is hard to tell at this time. As I stated previously only time will tell. I will find out soon enough and go from there. If she is I will love her as I love my other 2 children. Read my Post to friend. It will tell you the rest. I noticed a problem with my other 2 children fairly early. I seen the signs and set helpless. I see no problems with my 3rd as of yet, like I said time will tell.

Since: Jan 07

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Oct 21, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Now I don't believe in the things Raymond always posts. There's no reason why the Government wouldn't try and find autism answers, people just have to admit some medical answers are never known. Blaming the Government is just a cheap way to "we'd have answers if they'd only look". For some people, that idea makes them cope easier.

The thing with vaccinated kids or not, is my kid of course isn't yours and may have risk factors yours doesn't. His genetics isn't the same as others, either. The same as what works for my child intervention-wise may not work for yours.

What we all really need is one finally link, which would pertain to all children. I still think an over looked possibility is the use of plastics, which is one thing other than vaccines which almost every household has alot of. Chemicals may not effect DNA in you once exposed, but it could in the offspring. For the many years vaccines have been is use and Thimerosal, it's hard to think that would be it in my mind and only at one time period there's an explosion of autism.

Honestly, I think the search should begin with the parents than just with the children with autism.

By the way, my sister for no other reason delayed vaccines due to no insurance. Her son was caught up by the time he entered school but depending on your state, you could get a waiver. You could also have the titers tested prior. My son was vaccinated for pertussis, and some years back those teens were getting that and they had the vaccine too so in 2005 they added a booster. In MN, for the last 6 to 8 months, my sons age group (10 yrs old) has been getting pertussis. My guess is a booster may be coming sooner. But my point, my neighbors 3 year old who has health issues, doesn't build immunity via that vaccine and had my son been around him, he would have been sicker than my child was who had some immunity. You cant be around others for 5 full 24 hr days after you start the meds, or you risk infecting others. Other than a slight cough, I had no idea it was pertussis. No fever. Pertussis undetected and not treated causes the virus to turn into some long toxic word and that cough lasts 6 to 8 weeks. my kid missed 7 days of school, the lab test takes 2 to 3 days. Now I am so happy we had rotten weather and my kid wasn't around the kids across the street prior to knowing he had pertussis. Had I known he could have contracted pertussis, I would have had him get another vaccine. Now I have to explain to a kid with autism we don't stay home for any little cough.
Raymond

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Oct 21, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Here we go: Friend is here to make a few bucks...

Vaccins are one significant major cause of autism. Cellphones, Microwave (Plastic leaching) is another possible source. But the government specially the CDC has failed completely their mandate: Prevention of disease and control.

Their fear however is justified: What would happen if a study of vaccinated vs unvaccinated children would be released. Surely there is data in house but what would the consequences be if this was released?? God forbid?

So many parents have lost the absolute confidence in the system. Who's fault is that? Surely not the parents. It is so stupid to assess the autism rate explosion to better diagnosis (A major bad move to downplay the numbers which talk for themselves). Nonverbal regressive autistics were not so common 30 years ago. Nowadays they are everywhere. Just go to your public education board and seek for yourself.

Bottom Line: Vaccins are a true cause of autism not a myth, not a joy to relate one to another. But it is the reality.

Since: Jan 07

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Oct 22, 2009
 

Judged:

2

2

1

There you go again accusing me of making money yet you show no valid proof to your claim about vaccines. If you did go and look at the national education records and took a look, you might be surprised plus that's educational info, not medical and that's where the main problem is: where one looks for the autism rates.

If vaccines causing autism is not a myth, you tell me why, when vaccines have been in use for many years (50 yrs) why there wasn't so many recorded autism 30 years ago and why all kids who had vaccines do not have autism? You also must not have met any one over 30 with autism or watch much TV in which a few have profiled those with autism over 30? You're also over looking the fact (not myth) of how society was 30 to 50 years ago and if you had a disabled child, they were not kept at home.

Vaccines does prevent of disease, history shows this however it is not fool proof. Not every human body builds immunity. People have chickenpox more than once. Had my own child not had the pertussis vaccines, when he contracted it his case of it would had been far worse than what it was. All anyone has to do other than history is go look at UK. Rejection of the measles vaccine only results in siffering children and some which have died.
Raymond

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Oct 24, 2009
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Friend:

Are you living on this planet? or you just a bubble head? Have you visited your school board: All these kids non verbal, no eye contacts, seizures, in the schools and special education. You still think everything is oK. If you believe so then you are a dumb azz.

Since: Jan 07

Minneapolis, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Oct 24, 2009
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Have you gone to many forum sites to learn on line manners? I don't think school districts parade their special ed kids and by law, they cant even tell you which are special ed or what their disability is so my guess is if you have gone to any schools, you're guessing as to what their diability is. But that's not even in question, there are many reasons for the increase in the autism rates and I'm sorry you can only acknowledge only one of those possible reasons.
Raymond

Dublin, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Oct 26, 2009
 
There is many reason for increase in autism online.

But on the field the vaccins and autism link has never ever been challenged? There is no study of vaccinated vs unvaccinated. Then you might see the real numbers pop up. But why do that and put the system in danger? Lets keep going it is only one kid in 100 being disabled.

Since: Jan 07

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Oct 27, 2009
 
Who needs to look at unvaccinated. All they needed to do is look at those vaccninated with autism and those vaccinated without autism in which many studies have done this.
MAJOR Mal

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Nov 12, 2009
 
A study in the cause of Autism.

I can just see the studies recomendation,

Please Sue Us...

Yeh right mate.
Tbird19482

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Nov 22, 2009
 
friend wrote:
There you go again accusing me of making money yet you show no valid proof to your claim about vaccines. If you did go and look at the national education records and took a look, you might be surprised plus that's educational info, not medical and that's where the main problem is: where one looks for the autism rates.
If vaccines causing autism is not a myth, you tell me why, when vaccines have been in use for many years (50 yrs) why there wasn't so many recorded autism 30 years ago and why all kids who had vaccines do not have autism? You also must not have met any one over 30 with autism or watch much TV in which a few have profiled those with autism over 30? You're also over looking the fact (not myth) of how society was 30 to 50 years ago and if you had a disabled child, they were not kept at home.
Vaccines does prevent of disease, history shows this however it is not fool proof. Not every human body builds immunity. People have chickenpox more than once. Had my own child not had the pertussis vaccines, when he contracted it his case of it would had been far worse than what it was. All anyone has to do other than history is go look at UK. Rejection of the measles vaccine only results in siffering children and some which have died.
I must say something here,
30 years ago when my son regressed the Drs didn't know what it was or what was causing it.
They just put him in the group called " retarded" and let him go. It wasn't until after alot of research by his mother and myself that we,[ not the DR.,] came upon the information on Autism.

And after talking to the Dr, about it,it was then that He looked into it.

So just maybe better Education of DRs has helped get these people classified correctly?

To let you know I am not anti-vaccine, nor pro-vaccine, But I do think more testing has to be done in every area of vaccines to make sure they are safe,

I would like to see somebody come up with some type of test we could give our children before we give them a vaccine to see if they will have a reaction to it.

Thank you for you time and have a nice day.

Since: Jan 07

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Nov 22, 2009
 
Autism was often called MR back in the day and today they still don't know what's causing autism. There's been many programs over the years to educate doctors about First Signs of autism, however it is a psych diagnosis so a general peds doc would generally not be the one to diagnose.

Coming up with that pre-test for vaccines means a genetic link. I'd like to have a test prior to actual exposure of a virus to see if my child would have a reaction. No one yet knows if that virus exposure would also be a trigger.
it suggests

Loretto, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Nov 22, 2009
 
that a genetic predisposition runs in your family. Families with one child diagnosed have a slightly higher risk of siblings also being diagnosed.

however, most studies show no significant difference in the incidence of autism in families that vaccinate and those that don't.

One of my friends vaccinated all 3 of her kids; one has Asperger Syndrome, one has Autism, and the last child, a girl, is typical.

It may be simply that boys are more likely to be diagnosed than girls.
Take Pride in History wrote:
I don't need a study I have done a experiment of my own. I have two children that are Autistic, a 9 year old boy and 5 year old girl. They have all immunizations. I also have a 1 year old little girl whom has never been immunized. At the age of one she is responding to her name, familiar voices and people. Tries to respond verbally. Great eye contact, loves to play and interact. When in a game such as patty cake or peek a boo she will interact along and when the game stops she initiates by making noise, and clapping hands to get it to continue. As well as many other wonderful things most babies her age are suppose to be doing. I believe that she is fine. What I am doing is not exactly what you would consider a controlled experiment but it seems to satisfy my curiosity for the time being. So any input would be accepted.
Tell me when this thread is updated!
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 1 - 20 of20
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Install the Topix Community Toolbar

Never miss another reply to your comments, no matter where you are on the web.

Daily Horoscope for December 30

Virgo

If the December sales are calling you, you'd better work out a budget before you leave the house. Otherwise, you'll be tempted to use your credit card first and only consider the cost of your purchase later on. Even so, you could track down some great bargains now, provided you don't get carried away and buy items that you don't really want simply because you're astonished by the amount of money you'll save in buying them. But you'll save even more money if you don't buy them!

Get your Horoscope »