Calif. regulators warn of pot's cancer capability

Would these be the "California regulators" who are receiving IOUs in their pay envelopes and are off on Fridays without pay?

Psuedo docters, leave pot alone, i will give up the cigarettes, but leave the pot alone.....

But, I doubt anyone is smoking 4 packs of medicial herb each day.. :-)

there are other ways to attain your dosage with out damaging your lungs. There is a vaporizer and ofcourse liquid forms (though gauging dose is VERY difficult that way) and as another poster pointed out...no one smokes four packs of joints a day

Buttheobvious wrote:

But, I doubt anyone is smoking 4 packs of medicial herb each day..:-)

They try real hard in Santa Cruz!

There are better ways to deliver medical marijuana instead of smoking, this is the best solution to legalizing pot while still preventing the general public from abusing it by making it another potential source of cancer. We don't need any more lung cancer patients due to smoking pot.

Please provide the list of humans who have developed cancer from weed. I need this ratio to make a personal decision.

There are no stats like that, this is all BS.....Full Bongs for me and all my men....

Popcorn wrote:

There are better ways to deliver medical marijuana instead of smoking, this is the best solution to legalizing pot while still preventing the general public from abusing it by making it another potential source of cancer. We don't need any more lung cancer patients due to smoking pot.

In a free society is is not the roll of government to tell anyone what they can put in their bodies by any means including smoking. Not all of us want to emulate the peoples republic of Kookifornia!

Free_America wrote:

<quoted text>In a free society is is not the roll of government to tell anyone what they can put in their bodies by any means including smoking. Not all of us want to emulate the peoples republic of Kookifornia!

Don't you need to get back to making cheese or something? When the issue gets to Madison, WI your voice can be heard then. We in California have enough problems to deal with without your two cents.

West Valley Dave Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't you need to get back to making cheese or something? When the issue gets to Madison, WI your voice can be heard then. We in California have enough problems to deal with without your two cents.

You export your problems to the rest of the country, like crap and tax,er I mean cap and trade and you want the rest of us to bail you out because of your socialistic programs, so boo hoo you made it our problem!

Free_America wrote:

<quoted text>You export your problems to the rest of the country, like crap and tax,er I mean cap and trade and you want the rest of us to bail you out because of your socialistic programs, so boo hoo you made it our problem!

I'm not asking you for anything, Cheesehead. I don't need a bail out and I'm more than willing to let our city and state governments go BK. And isn't cap and trade a federal thing by the Great God Obummer Hood and his merry band of socialist thieves? If you are p iss ed about the rising socialism in this country we are on the same side.

West Valley Dave Smith wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not asking you for anything, Cheesehead. I don't need a bail out and I'm more than willing to let our city and state governments go BK. And isn't cap and trade a federal thing by the Great God Obummer Hood and his merry band of socialist thieves? If you are p iss ed about the rising socialism in this country we are on the same side.

On that we agree. The problem is that most of the junk science that pushes for smoking bans and now pot come from California. It is nothing but a cheap attempt for the government to go for another power grab in the name of public health. The Surgeon generals report is based on CALEPA. The EPA both California have had a long history of manipulating science to suit their agenda. Here is a blog entry that I have done on the subject.
http://veritasvincitprolibertate.wordpress.co...
This study like all of them ignores the fact that cancer rates have more to do with location then smoking anything. Here is a map of all cancers.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/gis/atmapcan.pdf

Here is one for lung cancer.

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/gis/atmaplc.pdf

IF YOU NOTICE THE CONCENTRATION STAY THE SAME.

Not a whole lot of difference for heart disease.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/gis/atmaphd.pdf

LOCTION, LOCATION, LOCATION

I don't quite understand someone who has lived in California for many years, lecturing everyone else on the perils of socialism? This is a state that acted and spent, like there was literally no tomarrow....

Go Blue wrote:

I don't quite understand someone who has lived in California for many years, lecturing everyone else on the perils of socialism? This is a state that acted and spent, like there was literally no tomarrow....

don't cha just love the hypocracy?

That would be 'hypocrisy'. Put the bong down and take an English class.

Go Blue wrote:

I don't quite understand someone who has lived in California for many years, lecturing everyone else on the perils of socialism? This is a state that acted and spent, like there was literally no tomarrow....

Some of us Californians are very much against what the Dumbocratic majority has turned our state into.

Hmmm wrote:

Please provide the list of humans who have developed cancer from weed. I need this ratio to make a personal decision.

Bob marley...thats all i can think of

Yeah wrote:

That would be 'hypocrisy'. Put the bong down and take an English class.

I dont need to. All I need to do is type what I want to say. This isn't a spelling forum. There is nothing in the rules that say one needs to spell acurately to join these forums. Sow iph i whant to spel lyke this a will...and there isn't a damn thing you can about it. Dont like my posts? dont read them

I hate Every1 wrote:

<quoted text>I dont need to. All I need to do is type what I want to say. This isn't a spelling forum. There is nothing in the rules that say one needs to spell acurately to join these forums. Sow iph i whant to spel lyke this a will...and there isn't a damn thing you can about it. Dont like my posts? dont read them

Quite true. Of course, in doing so you come across as a dolt but that's your prerogative. Since you hate everyone, it's not terribly surprising.