I have read your articles on the Radicalism website that you created. lt has taught me a great deal, as all your writings have done. For this I feel grateful to you, and doubtless many other activist feel as I do. Many a trace, and many a germ of this infantile disease, to which without a doubt, has victimised a lot, has been chased away by your website, or will yet be eradicated by it. Your observations about the human rights abuses is indeed liable to be questioned. I know that. The revolution came so suddenly, and in a way so utterly different from what we expected. Your words will be an incentive to me, once again, and to an even greater extent than before, to base my judgement in all matters of tactics, also in the revolution, exclusively on reality, on the actual class-relations in Zimbabwe, as they manifest themselves politically and economically.
This seems contradictory. It is due, though, to the fact that the starting-point in your articles is not right. To my idea you are mistaken in your judgement regarding the analogy of the "Zanu Pf Thugs" with the people who openly dont approve your ideas, regarding the way activism is cultivated. That is to say you have victimised a lot of innocent souls with your hasty and nasty labling on your premature website. This leads you to mistake the cause, from which "Zanu pf Thugs", your the opposition, originates.
Therefore your articles SEEMS to be right, as long as your starting-point is assumed. If, however (as it should be), your starting point is rejected, the entire brochure (and your activism) is wrong. As all your mistaken, and partly mistaken, judgements converge in your condemnation of constructive criticism, especially from young people, and as I firmly intend to defend those you victimised and labelled "thugs"..
Two Arguments Refuted.
In the first place I must refute two of your arguments, that may mislead the judgment of your fans or readers. You scoff and sneer at the ridiculous and childish nonsense of your friends, making a great deal of any stupid message that props your inbox and relating them to the “people who want to haunt me", as you say. We quite agree with you, that these should be "exposed", but as it seems, you're doing everything for the two main reasons being :
1)Your asyllum status in Great Britain. But we do not agree with your scoffing. We understand the more enermies you have in Zimbabwe and abroad, the more likely the British are to have you there, but please dont be a VAMPIRE, youre sucking innocent blood so that you can live in Britain. You are victimising students, politicians and lots of innocent people and masses just to stay in Britain.
2) Its a revenge to your failed music career. For that is the pity of it: I only touch on this quite perfunctorily here. In the course of this writing. All i can say is that you seem to be a wounded souldier whose anger overfilows to the innocent.
Haters and Critics.
This representation, however, is not the truth. There is an enormous difference between Haters and Critics. In general the importance of critics as a revolutionary factor decreases from your perspective to my point view. I accept criticism and embrace it. You call your critics Haters and Thugs of Mugabe. It is this difference that is going to make my activism vibrant and be able to surpus yours. Actually, you are going to shrink and everyone is going to follow me.
I likewise request you, and the readesr, to excuse the frequent repetitions. They were unavoidable, owing to the fact that the dirty survival tactics of the “Viomak” are still unknown to the readers and unsuspecting civilians out there. CYBER BULLYING IS NOT ACTIVISM, Viomak.
With all that said, i say good bye friend.
"REAL" HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER..