Why do Turks pretend to be white?

This secretive desert kingdom was noted for its advanced mining and mathematics. It was destroyed by the civilization's patron diety because of the people's extreme sloth, leaving behind only tombs.

This arrogant waseland theocracy was noted for its advanced cartography and city-building. It was destroyed by a gradual decline, leaving behind only treasures.

OGHUZ TURKS ....

ANTHROPOLOGY

The Oguz Turks are labeled by some historians as "the purest of Turks" in terms of race, language and culture. According to Lev Gumilev in his accredited work entitled 1,000 years around the Caspian, the Oguz in the anthropological (racial) category were Caucasoid (Europoid).

The majority of today's Oguz Turks have light to dark skin tones and dark hair and eye colors, while lighter Europoid features including very light skin tones, blondish/brownish/reddish hair colors and light eye colors are evident in Azerbaijanis from the Republic of Azerbaijan and the northwestern region of Iran known as South Azerbaijan as well as the Turks of Turkey, Turkmens and other Oguz Turks. Elements of both Caucasoid and Mongoloid strains are evident in some.

Like most of the other Turkic peoples, the Oguz have a round skull formation, high cheek bones and straight hair.

http://turkmeniya.tripod.com/id35.html

So, Anthropology classifies us as White and when I look to my people, we're whiter than Greeks, Sicilians (if you withdraw kurds) and we're as white as folks like Serbs, Albanians,...

Grey Wolf wrote:

OGHUZ TURKS ....
ANTHROPOLOGY
The Oguz Turks are labeled by some historians as "the purest of Turks" in terms of race, language and culture. According to Lev Gumilev in his accredited work entitled 1,000 years around the Caspian, the Oguz in the anthropological (racial) category were Caucasoid (Europoid).
The majority of today's Oguz Turks have light to dark skin tones and dark hair and eye colors, while lighter Europoid features including very light skin tones, blondish/brownish/reddish hair colors and light eye colors are evident in Azerbaijanis from the Republic of Azerbaijan and the northwestern region of Iran known as South Azerbaijan as well as the Turks of Turkey, Turkmens and other Oguz Turks. Elements of both Caucasoid and Mongoloid strains are evident in some.

In terms of anthropology, Turks are not a race but a non-homogenous hybrid of various races developed from Mongolian stock as a F1 genetic base, i.e. a bastard people in street level language.
This fact seems to be the cause for many Turk's delusional obsession with 'maintaining racial purity'- an exercise in futility. Eastern Turkic people (Turkmens, Kazakhs) have primariliy Asiatic features whereas the western Turkics (Kurds,'Turks', Azeris) have been in close contact with Europeans for centuries and gradually began to develop mainly European features. The TRUE Turk would therefore be a Mongolian. Genetically, there IS NO SUCH THING as a Turkish people. There is only a TURKIC people.
Ataturk inaptly named his country Cumhuriyety Turkye; it would have been more fitting to call it Cumhuriyeti Anatolia although he may have chosen the former name so as not to be exclusive of Istanbul.
In summation, the Turks/Turkics are the Creoles of Asia Minor/Central Asia.

Turks are proud of being ignorant,
Turks are ignorant of being ignorant.
Turks are a destructive nation,
Turks are a parasite nation, Suck everything they find.
Turks think that power abuse is glory.The great parasite Empire
Turks do not know what they have done, nor what they are doing.
Violence and massacre is their way to deal with small problems,
Violence and Genocide to deal with big ones.
Denial and bigotry is their breath of life,
Can not face the truth about themselves,so very small chance of correction

Abdurachman wrote:

<quoted text>
In terms of anthropology, Turks are not a race but a non-homogenous hybrid of various races developed from Mongolian stock as a F1 genetic base, i.e. a bastard people in street level language.
This fact seems to be the cause for many Turk's delusional obsession with 'maintaining racial purity'- an exercise in futility. Eastern Turkic people (Turkmens, Kazakhs) have primariliy Asiatic features whereas the western Turkics (Kurds,'Turks', Azeris) have been in close contact with Europeans for centuries and gradually began to develop mainly European features. The TRUE Turk would therefore be a Mongolian. Genetically, there IS NO SUCH THING as a Turkish people. There is only a TURKIC people.
Ataturk inaptly named his country Cumhuriyety Turkye; it would have been more fitting to call it Cumhuriyeti Anatolia although he may have chosen the former name so as not to be exclusive of Istanbul.
In summation, the Turks/Turkics are the Creoles of Asia Minor/Central Asia.

No,
You still repeat the same old theory telling Turks are whiteized Mongols.

Did you know that what today Mongolia is, was a very ancient homeland of white Caucasoïd people.

Turks are White race; before we came to Anatolia, we got raped by Mongols; this was the reason of a few Mongol blood.

Today, it's been proved that Mongol blood in Turkey is just 6%, whereas Central Asian blood.

The ones in Central Asia are Mongol-mixed, Turkey's Turks are White, racially and the purest one.

KURDS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH US, THEY'RE IRANID MIXED WITH JEWS AND ARMENIANS, THEY'VE BROWN SKIN.

Science and Anthropology classify us White.
Turks have never entire black hair or eyes.
Turks have pale-skin.
Turks have Caucasoid skull.

because
2+2=4
or Ep=mgh
meaning true is true.we are white!when i look my mirror i can see white face at there.

Grey Wolf wrote:

<quoted text>
No,
You still repeat the same old theory telling Turks are whiteized Mongols.
Did you know that what today Mongolia is, was a very ancient homeland of white Caucasoïd people.
Turks are White race; before we came to Anatolia, we got raped by Mongols; this was the reason of a few Mongol blood.
Today, it's been proved that Mongol blood in Turkey is just 6%, whereas Central Asian blood.
The ones in Central Asia are Mongol-mixed, Turkey's Turks are White, racially and the purest one.
KURDS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH US, THEY'RE IRANID MIXED WITH JEWS AND ARMENIANS, THEY'VE BROWN SKIN.
Science and Anthropology classify us White.
Turks have never entire black hair or eyes.
Turks have pale-skin.
Turks have Caucasoid skull.

There might be a caucasoid skull but there is still a mongoloid brain in it.
You can't change facts. You live in denial.

Antis — Fanatics, Lunatics, Moronatics & Idiotics...

NUFSAID ABOUT ANTI-TURKS...

abdurachman wrote:

<quoted text>
There might be a caucasoid skull but there is still a mongoloid brain in it.
You can't change facts. You live in denial.

TRUTH:

Original Turks were white people, blondy-Reddish, with blue eyes. Our father, Oghuz Khan (founder of Proto-Hunnic Empire) is described as a blue-eyed, dark-brown haired guy.

THEN:
These Turks mixed!!!!!!!!!!

The ones in Central Asia mixed with Mongols (or better said, they got raped).

The ones in Iran and Iraq mixed with locals and they're brown.

In Western, Northern Turkey and Balkans, Turks mixed with Europeans.

THIS IS THE TRUTH.

Modern Genetics say 30% of Central Asian blood in Turkey and 6% Mongol blood.
6/30 = 0.2 or 20 %
20% is the maximum Asiatic-blood that had been brought to Anatolia by TURKMEN WARRIOR.

Take into account the fact that 2 billions Tatars came to Anatolia in 1790's (20% of them look 100% Mongol).

I MEAN THE ORIGINAL TURKS INVADING ANATOLIA WERE AT LEAST 90% WHITE.

WHO THE HELL CARES THE OTHER 10%, EVEN IN HUNGARY, TODAY, YOU'VE 13% MONGOL BLOOD.

IF SERBS, RUSSIANS, BULGARS,... ARE WHITE, WE'RE WHITE TOO.

IF GREEKS, SICILIANS,.. ARE WHITE, WE'RE 300% WHITE.

AT U.S. CENSUS, TURKS ARE CLASSIFIED AS WHITE AND EUROPEAN (lol).

Turks are definitely white race; you can't even tell we're mixed, seen the criterions ....

We're similar to Balkan folks like Bulgars, Serbs, Albanians,... IF WE WITHDRAW THE KURDS.

There are many historical prooves to that:

"Belgrad was finally captured by Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent and his 250,000 soldiers; subsequently, most of the city was razed to the ground and its entire Christian population deported to Istanbul. Belgrade was made the seat of the district (Sanjak), attracting new inhabitants—Turks, Armenians, Greeks, Ragusan traders, and others, and there was peace for the next 150 years".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgrade

No Turk is "brown", all the Turks are pale and they are white.

Our language is not Altaïc, it's Uralo-Altaïc.

I can even say Hungarian to Turkish than Mongolian.

Q: What do you call a Turk with half a brain? A: Gifted

Grey Wolf wrote:

We're similar to Balkan folks like Bulgars, Serbs, Albanians,... IF WE WITHDRAW THE KURDS.
There are many historical prooves to that:
"Belgrad was finally captured by Sultan Suleyman the Magnificent and his 250,000 soldiers; subsequently, most of the city was razed to the ground and its entire Christian population deported to Istanbul. Belgrade was made the seat of the district (Sanjak), attracting new inhabitants—Turks, Armenians, Greeks, Ragusan traders, and others, and there was peace for the next 150 years".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgrade
No Turk is "brown", all the Turks are pale and they are white.
Our language is not Altaïc, it's Uralo-Altaïc.
I can even say Hungarian to Turkish than Mongolian.

How about this Turk in the photo? He doesn't look Swedish to me...

http://aton.ttu.edu/images/pics/10-sovet_resm...

THIS IS what the real Turk looked like before rapping women in Anatolia for centuries...

Reality Check wrote:

<quoted text>
How about this Turk in the photo? He doesn't look Swedish to me...
http://aton.ttu.edu/images/pics/10-sovet_resm...
THIS IS what the real Turk looked like before rapping women in Anatolia for centuries...

No man,
this man's ancestors got raped by the Mongols.
And, we, the Turks, when we came to Anatolia, we didn't mass-mixed with jewish-sepharadic-iranid armenoïds or Greeks.

If we've found 1.2 billion armenians and 1.5 Greeks to DEPORT (not genocide).

THIS IS THE PROOF WE'VE NOT MIXED MUCH WITH YOU.
We mixed much with Balkan (Bosnian, Albanian, Serbs,...) and Caucasian (Circassians, Chechens, Ajarians,...) folks, not with Armenid.

We've sent Armenians to Serbia, to get the Slavs in Istanbul LOL, read the article about Belgrad.

by American census standards turks fall under category of "OTHER". Or Not of Caucasian origin.
Americans also refer to turks as turkmen or turkestanis who should mark asian on census forms.

if not of Caucasian origin, then it is not classified white.
turks are enemies of Caucasia, and throughout centuries have tried to invade Transcaucasus from central asia, therefore not Caucasian.

May be we should treat antrapoligist as a drug dealers and lock them behind bars to inter breed with Alligetors.
After collapse of USSR fascism took its place , t6his was predicted by Lord Bertram Russel in his master peace works " History of Western Civilization"

Asked Andera Ghandi her father" what is Fascism "

Father in while Jail wrote to her " FASCISM ARE THOSE WHO USES RELIGION AND RACE FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES"
Now let see whose aass whiter then who
End of discussion

Her father was Jewherlal Nehru

Need Weed Feed...

If anyone needs a weed feed, shant has plenty to share ;)

one day they ask a turk if some one gives the world to you what will you do with it?
he said i will sell it and buy a USA visa

Security wrote:

Antis — Fanatics, Lunatics, Moronatics & Idiotics...
NUFSAID ABOUT ANTI-TURKS...

Message to Turks:

We were patient enough with your primitive attitude.

Turks must become civilized if they want peace with neighbors!

One last time: THERE IS NO LONGER AN OTTOMAN EMPIRE, GET OVER IT!

mike wrote:

by American census standards turks fall under category of "OTHER". Or Not of Caucasian origin.
Americans also refer to turks as turkmen or turkestanis who should mark asian on census forms.
if not of Caucasian origin, then it is not classified white.
turks are enemies of Caucasia, and throughout centuries have tried to invade Transcaucasus from central asia, therefore not Caucasian.

Turks are Caucasoïd-skulled and pale-skinned people. I know that US census classify Turks as "white and European".

Turks are descendent of early Huns, whom were descendent of the Schythians!

There are Afrikaneers that live in South Africa, are they non-white for that?
What a dumb comment. Turks invaded Caucasia, Anatolia, Arabia, Europe,...
We've brought Civilization to these areas, we've brought our high Culture.

Since when the wars that happened are a criterion to classify people anthropologically ?

Turks are definitely as white as Balkans or Northern Native Caucasian folks.

Armenians are not White.

Grey Wolf wrote:

<quoted text>
Turks are Caucasoïd-skulled and pale-skinned people. I know that US census classify Turks as "white and European".
Turks are descendent of early Huns, whom were descendent of the Schythians!
There are Afrikaneers that live in South Africa, are they non-white for that?
What a dumb comment. Turks invaded Caucasia, Anatolia, Arabia, Europe,...
We've brought Civilization to these areas, we've brought our high Culture.
Since when the wars that happened are a criterion to classify people anthropologically ?
Turks are definitely as white as Balkans or Northern Native Caucasian folks.
Armenians are not White.

How come on all the seljukian and early ottoman (and even persians depicting turks) miniature drawings we see mongoloid eyes?