Wikileaks: Julian Assange accused of rape by multiple women

Assange accused of rape by multiple women?

I'm much more inclined to believe that Assange has been stalked (with the intent of raping him) by "multiple" women.

Take the average unemployed prostitute - not so difficult to find now that prostitution has been outlawed in Sweden - who's got a drug problem, offer her a half million CIA Dollars to testify that she's been rapped by the Pope and I'd like to know how many such women will decline the offer.

The Swedish government is sleeping with the American CIA. There can be no doubt of that. Sweden has put Assange on international "efterlyst" (wanted) for ALLEGED rape charges! I am not aware that Sweden has ever put someone on such a status for such a minor crime. SOMETHING STINKS!

Yes. There is a new documentary dealing with Wikileaks called "“Wikileaks the Secret Document on Iraq”. If you get a chance to see it you should. There is a lot that in it that we need to know.

The biggest embarrassment will be on the news media in America. The publishing of torture techniques instead of where WMDs were relocated begets the unofficial motto of the media. "The News is what we decide it is, and if we do not report it, it is not the news."

Well said, realist.

Who believes there's no corruption in Scandinavian countries is naive.

These accusations of rape are just that: a set up. Sweden is officially a neutral country but as an important exporter of military weapons is afraid of being awkward to the US.

Shame on Swedish corrupt justice oficials.

We need more Assanges in this world.

Annie Muk wrote:

Assange accused of rape by multiple women?
I'm much more inclined to believe that Assange has been stalked (with the intent of raping him) by "multiple" women.
Take the average unemployed prostitute - not so difficult to find now that prostitution has been outlawed in Sweden - who's got a drug problem, offer her a half million CIA Dollars to testify that she's been rapped by the Pope and I'd like to know how many such women will decline the offer.

But wouldn't that leave open the question of credibility. For half a million dollars the set up will have seen to customizing the scenario to fit the subject. Perhaps something different needed for the pope but boy Azzranger is certainly credible for present purpose.

JoaoP wrote:

Who believes there's no corruption in Scandinavian countries is naive .......... We need more Assanges in this world.

No doubt about either of these statetments.

Anti-Communist wrote:

Only right-wing nationalists should be entitled to FREE SPEECH.
Assange is a leftist who has ties to the evil communist George Soros. Assange is a left-wing activist, and left-wing activists should not have free speech. Socialists, Muslims and Liberals are TERRORISTS, and should be silenced.
In Europe, USA, Canada it should be made illegal to be a communist, liberal or muslim.[/QUOTE

This guy is insane.

[QUOTE who="Anti-Communist" ]The US is a Consitutional Republic, not a democracy

Hmmm, maybe he got lucky this time and hit the keys in the proper order by mistake.

But what do they mean by "muliple" women? Like 20 or 30 women perhaps? These American reporters suck, following along with the childish American habit of misuse of the English language. I'm surprised the article wasn't laden with every sentence beginning with the word "basically". So tedious!

I think, passerby, that he is an ill-mannered nincompoop with permanent constipation and an extremely limited vocabulary consisting of the words, "anti" - "leftist" - "liberal" - and ah, "hate". He's a troll, make no mistake, who doesn't know anyting at all about what he's talking about. He merely scans the newspapers with his index finger, looking for the few words that fit into his vocabulary and then makes the rest up as he goes along. It's what he calls "knowledge".

Anti-Communist wrote:

... you have said nothing constructive so far Annie.
.....

"Constructive"? Perhaps not, yet what I've said so far is an accurate description of you and your stupidity. "Constructing", with the intention of healing you of your own destructive ignorance is not my job and, frankly, you don't impress me enough to care.

Temple Dog wrote:

<quoted text>
But wouldn't that leave open the question of credibility. For half a million dollars the set up will have seen to customizing the scenario to fit the subject. Perhaps something different needed for the pope but boy Azzranger is certainly credible for present purpose.

"Credibility" - You'd probalby need to live in Sweden to know that "credibility" is (indirectly) on the side of the prostitute. Sweden beleives that men are responsible for ALL maladies that befall any woman. The pusher - The pimp - The client - her boyfriend - etc. In Sweden a man can be charged with rape for verbally convincing his wife that they ought to have sex, if she claims that she initially wasn't "in the mood". Even a prostitute can claim that her client "raped" her and she will be given the benefit of the doubt in a Swedish court of law.

No, I'm afraid that Julian will have to accept the fact that the cards are stacked against him and he can only pray to get off with paying a large fine and to hope to escape a prison sentence. That is not his main worries, of course. If the United Snakes gets their hands on him it'll be "goodbye Julian" for a long, long, time - or to make a deal to confess to an array of fabricated "crimes" and "wrong-doings" - hung out to dry and discredited for all of his fans >>> and to dismantle Wikileaks.

The reigns of Wikileaks' power MUST be given to someone whose activities cannot be affected by Julian's situation, so that whatever Julian is coerced into saying (or doing) will not hinder Wikileaks from continuing its work.

This fool, "Anti-Communist", isn't satisfied that he knows not what he is talkiing about - no, he's determined to mis-understand what everyone else is saying too.:)

passerby wrote:

All the right wings nazis should be shot.

What, not hanged?

Don't try to bluff me. No, if anything at all you were a Pongo who spent his days at the NAAFI, gorging on sticky buns. I can tell by your category 3 genuine idiocy.

Anti-Communist wrote:

I have served in the British Air Force, and I have achieved more in 4 years than you in a lifetime.

Well then, my 3 years in the American Army, one year in the Vietnam war, plus 20 years of travelling around the world overland on my own, and my years with the RAF at Gatow Flugplatz qualifies me in correctly identifying you as a phoney who knows sod all about life or the world.

I'm pretty certain that I have wasted enough of my time on you and your idiotic misinformation.

Annie Muk: Sweden beleives that men are responsible for ALL maladies that befall any woman. The pusher - The pimp - The client - her boyfriend - etc. In Sweden a man can be charged with rape for verbally convincing his wife that they ought to have sex, if she claims that she initially wasn't "in the mood". Even a prostitute can claim that her client "raped" her and she will be given the benefit of the doubt in a Swedish court of law.

Thank you Annie. You prove the stupidity of liberal values. You have shown that liberalism actually leads to reverse sexism. I'm sure that was not your intention. And I'm sure that you only made the statement in the service of some greater liberal cause, but I'll take the effect in any case. And, yes, what you say above is true. I don't care one way or the other about Assage, but apparently he is charged with rape on the basis of having sex without a condom. The fact that the two women approved of having sex with him is irrelevant in Sweden. Supposedly, with the first woman the condom broke, and so Assage is guilty. With the second woman he did not wear a condom the second time that they had sex. And so he is guilty. Now and individual with two brain cells might ask, if this is illegal in Sweden and if the woman didn't want to have sex without a condom, then why didn't she just tell Assage? Then if Assage had insisted or if he had forced her, then it would have been a case of ordinary rape. But apparently, in Sweden, where a woman is suppose to be in all ways equal to a man, a woman cannot be expected to do anything like say, "I'm sorry but I won't have sex if you don't wear a condom." Instead of expecting her to do a simple thing like that, they would just rather throw the man in prison for four years and absolve the woman of everything. The utter stupidity and sexism of liberalism! And the utter stupidity of Sweden!

VSALUKI; You are probably the most confused person that I have ever met, but I'm sure that you already know that.

"VSALUKI; You are probably the most confused person that I have ever met, but I'm sure that you already know that."

Annie; you are probably the dumbest woman that I have ever met, but I'm sure that you already know that. Gee isn't communication great.

"He's another jerk who can't use condoms, and met two jerk girls who maybe allowed him to."

Like they say, having sex with a condom is like taking a bath with your sox on. Anyway, what business is it of yours if they had sex without a condom. The only thing that matters is if the women agreed or disagreed. If they didn't agree they should have refused to have sex with him. Then if he forced them, the case would be a very simple and unambigous rape case. Which it apparently is not. Coming back later and claiming that they didn't agree but they didn't refuse to have sex either is something that could only happen in a man hating, sexist, stupid country like Sweden.

In any case, we know that the CIA had nothing to do with this. They simply don't have the imagination to dream up a scenario that is this absurd.