Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize for 'extraordinary efforts to stre...

Church Slave wrote:

<quoted text> Even weeds in a garden and trees in the forest push foward and march.

That was in Fantasia, right?

Church Slave wrote:

<quoted text>
I would not mind liberals so much if they didn't mind Christians so much. Coexistance is worth pursuning but at the end of the day it seems as though each group wants to dominate.
Even weeds in a garden and trees in the forest push foward and march.

You hit it right on the head. Most liberals aren't Christians and strive to fight morality. That's why they find it hard to co-exist. They're exact opposites. Sad, but true.

Jessica A wrote:

<quoted text>
You hit it right on the head. Most liberals aren't Christians and strive to fight morality. That's why they find it hard to co-exist. They're exact opposites. Sad, but true.

PROVE IT!!!! I'll wait.

Jessica A wrote:

<quoted text>
You hit it right on the head. Most liberals aren't Christians and strive to fight morality. That's why they find it hard to co-exist. They're exact opposites. Sad, but true.

To be a Christian, one must follow the words of Christ first. Jesus Christ taught tolerance, not being judgemnental, assisting those with less and to spread the word through holding yourself as an example and teaching.

This hardly describes the policy on the right, but comes closer to being on the left.

okboston wrote:

<quoted text>
Which Koolaid? The ideas and principles she wrote of were conservative.

The same koolaid you drink.

Jessica A wrote:

<quoted text>
You hit it right on the head. Most liberals aren't Christians and strive to fight morality. That's why they find it hard to co-exist. They're exact opposites. Sad, but true.

the issue is that Godmockers like yourself choose to not follow God's laws. It is abundantly clear that homosexuality is an abomination and deserving of PRISON (Lev. 18:22). The burden of proof is on you to show why we should legalize homosexual marriage. Of course, it's impossible to do so because the Bible is so clear on that.
__________

The blessing of the LORD, it maketh rich, and he addeth no sorrow with it. Proverbs 10:22

TRUECRISTIAN wrote:

<quoted text>the issue is that Godmockers like yourself choose to not follow God's laws. It is abundantly clear that homosexuality is an abomination and deserving of PRISON (Lev. 18:22). The burden of proof is on you to show why we should legalize homosexual marriage. Of course, it's impossible to do so because the Bible is so clear on that.
__________
The blessing of the LORD, it maketh rich, and he addeth no sorrow with it. Proverbs 10:22

You are absolutely correct and it is refreshing to see someone admit that the US should live by Shia law.

Unfortunately for you and those like you, the US has embedded in its Constitution a separation of church and state. Therefore no law can stand based strictly on a Biblical reference. An excellent example can be found in the 10 Commandments.

"Thou shalt put no other before me." And yet, many among us worship the Gods of capitalism and materialism before the God of the Bible.

On the other hand "Thou shalt not kill." has an obvious benefit to society at large and can be justified as a law without reference to the Bible.

Therefore, is their a societal justification for laws against homosexuality?

Seeking truth wrote:

<quoted text>
Nor has anyone ever proven the existence of love. Does that mean it doesn't exist?

Using an intangible is a poor argument. I've seen more evidence of love than I have evidence of god. I'm not saying god does not exist, I'm saying that it hasn't been proven and that it is improbable. Love is not improbable.