Why are Greeks dark skinned?

analyses. Our HLA data show that both southern from Ghannouch and northern Tunisians are of a Berber substratum in spite of the successive incursions (particularly, the 7th-8th century A.D. Arab invasion) occurred in Tunisia. It is also the case of other North Africans and Iberians. This present study confirms the relatedness of Greeks to Sub-Saharan populations. This suggests that there was an admixture between the Greeks and Sub-Saharans probably during Pharaonic period or after natural catastrophes (dryness) occurred in Sahara.

Greek people give them bananas not euros there monkeys after all

Richard wrote:

analyses. Our HLA data show that both southern from Ghannouch and northern Tunisians are of a Berber substratum in spite of the successive incursions (particularly, the 7th-8th century A.D. Arab invasion) occurred in Tunisia. It is also the case of other North Africans and Iberians. This present study confirms the relatedness of Greeks to Sub-Saharan populations. This suggests that there was an admixture between the Greeks and Sub-Saharans probably during Pharaonic period or after natural catastrophes (dryness) occurred in Sahara.

Richard your such a bright spark were did you cut and paste this crap.....I suggest Richard your a farken idiot...I don't need no study to work that one out...

REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA wrote:

====HELLASS'==ARE PURE AFRICAN[ETHIOPIAN-GAY REEKS]===
===F---THIS MONKEYS GOOD FOTR NATHING;;;;;;;LAZY BASTARDS;;;;;;BROKE ;;HE HE ;;BROKE;;;;

Another idiot...LOLSKI stll cant use the quote system

Richard wrote:

analyses. Our HLA data show that both southern from Ghannouch and northern Tunisians are of a Berber substratum in spite of the successive incursions (particularly, the 7th-8th century A.D. Arab invasion) occurred in Tunisia. It is also the case of other North Africans and Iberians. This present study confirms the relatedness of Greeks to Sub-Saharan populations. This suggests that there was an admixture between the Greeks and Sub-Saharans probably during Pharaonic period or after natural catastrophes (dryness) occurred in Sahara.

Read the research buddy: Guess what? It was sponsored by Skopski government to influence situation ! Wake up !

PROTAGORAS wrote:

<quoted text>
Read the research buddy: Guess what? It was sponsored by Skopski government to influence situation ! Wake up !

what situation?
leaving the Euro is the Greek situation, nothing to do with Macedonia,...

grk-off wrote:

<quoted text>
what situation?
leaving the Euro is the Greek situation, nothing to do with Macedonia,...

Check the site by DIENEKES PONTIKOS

Richard wrote:

Greek people give them bananas not euros there monkeys after all

Hey Ritchie Dikie, whats your real name buster ?

MEGAS ALEXANDROS wrote:

Yep keep reading FYROM PROPAGANDA, that will get you to the top

shuddup Blacky

MacedoniaNEVERGreek wrote:

<quoted text>
shuddup Blacky

Ajde fake Fyromian, titoistic YUGO pseudonation!

Skopians are not heritage of the Alexander the Great! They are Pseudohellenes!!

FYROM is VARDAR Region! Not Macedonia

See ... operate in the "region of the Vardar". Not operate in the Region Macedonia!

Area of the region Vardar: Uskup, Kara-Dagh, Moravitza, Ptchinia, Komanova-Karatova, Kostendil-Egri-Palanka- Uskup and Kostendil-Tzarevo-Selo-Kotchan i, Kostendil and Vrania, Kostendil-Egri-Palanka-Uskup, Kara-Dagh, Uskup, shall, Kostendil, Bossilegrad, Vlassina, Maritza!
Agreement Between The General Staffs Of Bulgaria And Servia

Signed June 19, 1912

In case the principal Turkish army should be concentrated in the region of Uskup, Komanova, Karatova, Kotchani, Veles, the allied troops intended to operate in the region of the Vardar shall be divided as follows:
1. A Servian army in two divisions shall march upon Uskup by way of Kara-Dagh. This army shall form the right wing of the allied troops.
2. A Servian army of five divisions of infantry and a division of cavalry shall advance through the valley of the Moravitza and the Ptchinia, upon the Komanova-Karatova side. This army shall form the center of the allied troops and shall have the duty of carrying on operations in front of the enemy.
3. A Bulgarian army of three divisions shall form the left wing of the allied troops, with the duty of operating against the right wing and on the rear of the enemy, in the direction of Kostendil-Egri-Palanka- Uskup and Kostendil-Tzarevo-Selo-Kotchan i.
4. The two heads of the general staffs shall reconnoitre together the region between Kostendil and Vrania, and if this reconnoissance demonstrates the possibility of employing large forces in the direction of Kostendil-Egri-Palanka-Uskup the two Servian divisions intended to operate by way of Kara-Dagh against Uskup, shall, if the general situation permits, be employed to reinforce the left wing of the allied troops and shall be concentrated for this purpose near Kostendil.
5. To cover the right flank of the allied troops, the chief of the general staff of the Servian army shall place at its disposition the three remaining divisions of troops of the second reserve.
6. The chief of the field staff of the Bulgarian army agrees to attend to the prompt restoration of the road from Bossilegrad to Vlassina.
7. If the situation requires the reinforcement of Bulgarian troops upon the field of operations along the Maritza, and if, in the region of the Vardar, all the troops above enumerated are not absolutely indispensable, the necessary troops shall be transported from the latter field of operations to that of the Maritza. And inversely, if the situation requires the reinforcement of the allied troops on the field of operation of Vardar and if the retention of all the troops designated for the operations upon the field of Maritza is not indispensable, the necessary troops shall be transported from this field to that of Vardar.

Skopians are Vardar bulgarians, titoistic Yugoslavian pseudonation with Greek name!

Damianos wrote:

<quoted text>
Bulgarian hybrid you are that stupid to speak about things you have no idea about!
When we were living free after our liberation from the ottomans you were still under them since
(1) Athens was captured from Ottoman Turks in 1458 and the city was liberated in 1821.
(2) Skopje was captured from Ottoman turks in 1392 and the city was liberated in 1912.
(3) Thessaloniki was captured from Ottoman turks in 1430 and the city was liberated in 1912.
(4) Trapezounta was captured from Ottoman turks in 1461, and the Pontian refugees migrated to Greece in 1923.
Therefore,
Skopje was under Turkey for:
157 years MORE than Athens.
40 years MORE than Thessaloniki.
58 years MORE than the Pontian refugees.
As to who is 'Black"!
Who has the most E1b1b genes in Europe?
http://www.eupedia.com/europe/european_y-dna_...
Albania (27.5%)
"Progenitors of the White race" a.k.a. FYROM (23%)
Greece (21%)
Serbia (20.5%)
Cyprus (20%)
Bulgaria (16%)
Bosnia & Herzegovina (14.5%)
Well, you are second in African genes only to Albania... Not that it matters to anybody except you deluded NAZI’s and demented white supremacists. Just to inform you, if you haven’t heard, WE ALL ORIGINATE FROM AFRICA according to the DNA evidence, except you donkeys that originated from your momma’s ASS’S!
There is nothing scientific coming out of your stupid shit hole country. Just pseudo ‘scientific’ NAZI garbage!
AAAAAAAAAAhahahahahaha!!!!

You fool. Paleolithic Greeks aren't originated in Africa and Archanthropus ( 700.000 BC ) originated in Greece. Archanthropus are not from Africa and Asia. Those who had African DNA are immigrants who married Greeks.

You proved yourself that you are fake Greek and supporting Greek origin of African DNA. Greek origin of African DNA which is not true.

Damianos, do you realize that eupedia and iGenea showing that Greeks are not Macedonians?! You fool.

Ups wrote:

Damianos, do you realize that eupedia and iGenea showing that Greeks are not Macedonians?! You fool.

hahahaha show evidence not eveidence funded by the brainwashed idiots of FYROM

The Lie Detector wrote:

<quoted text>leela you should be checked for herpies...you are a used up cow!!!what do you know of macedonians...they are not greek...

i don,t have to sell my body to anybody like you to survive. Is there some thing you want to tell us about your herpes and how it's driving you insane? making you think you are a from a greek tribe? Because nowhere in history does it say that Macedonians were exBulgarian slavs like yourself.

MacedoniaNEVERGreek wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody is bastardized than a mongol Greek who carries a Turkish family name yet claims to be 100% related to Pericles! WTF.(you probably don't even know who pericles is cab boy)
What's this I hear that it's ok to screw your first cousin in Greece? Shame on you LOL...

believe it or not you hybrid slavs have turkish last names too.

PROTAGORAS wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey Ritchie Dikie, whats your real name buster ?

My real name is Richard malakas and I love bananas because I am a monkey from Athens

MacedoniaNEVERGreek wrote:

<quoted text>
it's 50% Turko. Read his quote. That is HALF of the population in Athens have TURKISH surnames.....and genes ofcourse. LOLski

YOU YOURSELF stated ”That is one in 40 Greeks has a Turkish last name”, NOT me!

Richard wrote:

<quoted text>According to the Arniaz study,…..Greeks are found to have a substantial relatedness to sub-Saharan (Ethiopian) people, which separate them from other Mediterranean groups. Both Greeks and Ethiopians share quasi-specific DRB1 alleles, such as *0305,*0307,*0411,*0413,*0416, *0417,*0420,*1110,*1112,*1304 and *1310. Genetic distances are closer between Greeks and Ethiopian/sub-Saharan groups than to any other Mediterranean group and finally Greeks cluster with Ethiopians/sub-Saharans in both neighbour joining dendrograms and correspondence analyses. The time period when these relationships might have occurred was ancient but uncertain and might be related to the displacement of Egyp

Dropped genetics paper lacked scientific merit
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v416/n68...

Our primary concern, however, is that the authors might be perceived to have been discriminated against for political, as opposed to legitimate scientific, reasons.

Even a cursory look at the paper’s diagrams and trees immediately indicates that the authors make some extraordinary claims. They used a single genetic marker, HLA DRB1, for their analysis to construct a genealogical tree and map of 28 populations from Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Japan. Using results from the analysis of a single marker, particularly one likely to have undergone selection, for the purpose of reconstructing genealogies is unreliable and unacceptable practice in population genetics.

The limitations are made evident by the authors’ extraordinary observations that Greeks are very similar to Ethiopians and east Africans but very distant from other south Europeans; andthat the Japanese are nearly identical to west and south Africans. It is surprising that the authors were not puzzled by these anomalous results, which contradict history, geography, anthropology and all prior population-genetic studies of these groups. Surely the ordinary process of refereeing would have saved the field from this dispute.

We believe that the paper should have been refused for publication on the simple grounds that it lacked scientific merit.