|
Nick the Greek
Brighton, UK
|
http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2009/11/finally-... There are also other useful conclusions that we may draw from this study: 1. The presence of R1a in Scandinavia does not reflect any sort of Balto-Slavic admixture, as R-M458 is lacking in them. This, coupled with the discovery of R1a chromosomes in ancient remains from Eulau and Lichtenstein in German territory suggests that R1a was present among ancient Germanic speakers. However, there is also structure in R-M458 frequency in Germany itself, with lowest percentages reached in the north and west; this suggests an admixture with Baltic and/or Slavic elements in present-day Germany itself. 2. In several Balkan samples the frequency of R-M458 ranges between 0-12% which is at most a third of its maximum frequency, suggesting that the extent of Slavic admixture in the Balkans is upper-bounded by about 1/3. The complete absence of R-M458 in Italy and its sub-1% representation in Anatolia further support the idea that R-M458 in the Balkans is of medieval and later origins. 3. The samples from Greece (N=263), Macedonian Greeks (N=57), and Crete (N=361) have R-M458 frequency of 4.2, 8.8, and 2.2%. Assuming a frequency of R-M458 at 36.4% in ancestral Slavs, as in south Poland, the admixture estimates are 11.5, 24, 6%. These should probably be interpreted as upper limits (plus statistical margins) because the highest present-day frequency of R-M458 is probably lower than that in early Slavs. 4. Interestingly, the Slavs of FYROM have an R-M458 frequency of 3.8%, barely different from that of Greeks at large, suggesting that (i) the claims of some Greek nationalists that they Slavs of FYROM are newcomers to the Balkans are wrong, just as (ii) the claim of some FYROMian nationalists that they are markedly different from Greeks are wrong. The actual truth is that the Slavs of FYROM are largely of old Balkan (pre-Slavic) stock who adopted a non-Balkan Slavic language, just as the modern Turks are largely of old Anatolian (pre-Turkish) stock who adopted a non-Anatolian Turkic language. European Journal of Human Genetics doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.194 http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurr... ********** Macedonians......Northern or Southern, Eastern or Western, are Closer than Most of us Care to Mention http://www.topix.com/forum/world/macedonia/TN... Who are the Slavicized Greeks of the Balkans!
|
|
Nick the Greek
Brighton, UK
|
|
|
Fillip II Reincarnated
UK
|
Real Greeks are Macedonians, the Northern ones. Northern Macedonians are the real true Greeks. We want to unite with the real Greeks of Greece, not the goat herding Turco Greeks from Asia.
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
Fillip II Reincarnated wrote: Real Greeks are Macedonians, the Northern ones. Northern Macedonians are the real true Greeks. We want to unite with the real Greeks of Greece, not the goat herding Turco Greeks from Asia. And WE GREEKS WANT YOU TO GO the heck BACK TO ASIA[ Pamir and Skythia and beyond] where you came from, YOU Aristocat Slavomongoloturcotatarskibulga rian!
|
|
Greek History
Europe
|
|
Joined: Nov 8, 2009
Comments: 16
|
FYROM is approx 60% Bulgarian and the rest Albanian. The so called Mkedonski language is Bulgarian. FYROM was never a part of ancient Macedonia. Now with the way the skopians are acting; they are basically making sure that their country will eventually be destroyed and annexed into Albania. They act in a rogue manner. They insult Greece and then demand we vote them into NATO and EU. Well this is not going to happen. Greece will veto FYROM until the Albanians (orifginal non slavic inhabitants of that geographical area) decide to make FYROM into another Kosovo. The Greeks (original non slavic inhabitants of that geographic area)have FYROM by the noose and allw e have to do to hang FYROM is use our second VETO!
|
|
Greek History
Europe
|
skopoianoFagos wrote: FYROM is approx 60% Bulgarian and the rest Albanian. The so called Mkedonski language is Bulgarian. FYROM was never a part of ancient Macedonia. Now with the way the skopians are acting; they are basically making sure that their country will eventually be destroyed and annexed into Albania. They act in a rogue manner. They insult Greece and then demand we vote them into NATO and EU. Well this is not going to happen. Greece will veto FYROM until the Albanians (orifginal non slavic inhabitants of that geographical area) decide to make FYROM into another Kosovo. The Greeks (original non slavic inhabitants of that geographic area)have FYROM by the noose and allw e have to do to hang FYROM is use our second VETO! good SF story :)
|
|
Metodija
UK
|
Macedonia and Turkey 4 ever!
|
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
Greek History wrote: Still desperate :) talking to me,dear?
|
|
Nick the Greek
Brighton, UK
|
4. Interestingly, the Slavs of FYROM have an R-M458 frequency of 3.8%, barely different from that of Greeks at large, suggesting that (i) the claims of some Greek nationalists that they Slavs of FYROM are newcomers to the Balkans are wrong, just as (ii) the claim of some FYROMian nationalists that they are markedly different from Greeks are wrong. The actual truth is that the Slavs of FYROM are largely of old Balkan (pre-Slavic) stock who adopted a non-Balkan Slavic language, just as the modern Turks are largely of old Anatolian (pre-Turkish) stock who adopted a non-Anatolian Turkic language. http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurr... Conclusion 1: Old Balkan (Pre-Slavic) Indigenous population = Greek Hellenic or Derivative. Conclusion 2: Old Balkan (Pre-Slavic) Indigenous populations that Adopted a NoN Balkan Slavic Language = Slavicization. Slavic Genticist's have proven beyond a Reasonable doubt.....Certain portions of FYRoM's population carry Indigenous Autochthonous genetic marker's, not that disimilar to that of the Modern Greek population. Certain portions of FYRoM's population are More Greek Hellenic than They care to Mention! Personal Conclusion: Re-Hellenization...get back to base, It's the Only Way of Sharing the History and Heritage of the Greeks. The door Remains Open, Reject Slavdom and Return back to Fold. You Speak the Language of the Slavs, Not because you are Slavic but because your Greek Hellenic Ancestor's got Slavicized....probably by Force! http://www.topix.com/forum/world/macedonia/TN... Who are the Slavicized Greeks of the Balkans!
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
http://dienekes.50webs.com/arp/articles/fallm... The above serious research arrives at two mutually exclusive conclusions : 1-the Greeks share the same DNA with their Ancient Greek Ancestors http://www.youtube.com/watch... http://www.youtube.com/watch... 2-The GREEKS DO NOT CLUSTER by DNA WITH EITHER SLAVS OR ALBANIANS Special mention is made ,-to historical anthropological evidence which proves that any admixture btn Greeks and Slavs is undetectable by DNA objective research,that simply means that it is statistically insignificant. Greeks since ancient times have obeyed to a cultural bias, based on various beliefs, against marrying with non-Greeks. We have here a very clear example dating from the 10nth ce AD Byzantium which shows that within the realm of a multi-ethnic Byzantium ,the Imperium Graecorum was not rushing to embrace some mixing of the 'races',in the Middle Ages. We must add here that the aforesaid situation was prolongated to our days. It so happens that this 'introversion', over marrying outside the group, has characterised [for its proper historical reasons] this country to our days. It is therefore quite improper to present dubious researches that try to offuscate well defined historical-cultural facts concerning the Hellenic nation at a time when the discourse of the 'beneficiaries' of that supposed mixing of the greek and slav peoples is characterised today by propaganda attempts by the Slavs to de-hellenise and de-humanise the Hellenes aiming to strip them of their history and of what is left of their land ,in a very racist manner!
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
Judged:
1
@lilalo here above!!!!!! adding missing reference! 10th ce historical evidence instructing the Greeks not to marry non-Greeks. http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2009/07/constant...
|
|
Dojran
Stockport, UK
|
North,west,east and south all Macedonians but no Greeks. I am buying property only from Greeks and prosfyges from Turkey in AEGEAN MACEDONIA.
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
Judged:
1
Metodija wrote: Macedonia and Turkey 4 ever! You are saying the truth! Yes since the advent of Ottoman yoke you the Crni Bulgars are heavily mixed with the Mongol-Turks!
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
Judged:
1
1
Dojran wrote: North,west,east and south all Macedonians but no Greeks. I am buying property only from Greeks and prosfyges from Turkey in AEGEAN MACEDONIA. You go back to Asia search your property and abstain from trying to de-hellenise the Macedonians,disrespectful,lowl ife, slav boxhead scum bag!
|
|
Dojran
Stockport, UK
|
lilalo wrote: <quoted text> You go back to Asia search your property and abstain from trying to de-hellenise the Macedonians,disrespectful,lowl ife, slav boxhead scum bag! So how much do you want for your property????(not the stolen one, you will give that back to the rightful owners the Macedonians for free.), I hope you done a good job in the garden, I like them nice and tidy. p.s does the property come furnished or unfurnished??
|
|
“You can't fix Stupid”
Joined: Oct 25, 2007
Comments: 941
Northern California, USA
ISP:
Redwood City, CA
|
Nick the Greek wrote: http://dienekes.blogspot.com/2 009/11/finally-structure-in-ha plogroup-r1a.html There are also other useful conclusions that we may draw from this study: 1. The presence of R1a in Scandinavia does not reflect any sort of Balto-Slavic admixture, as R-M458 is lacking in them. This, coupled with the discovery of R1a chromosomes in ancient remains from Eulau and Lichtenstein in German territory suggests that R1a was present among ancient Germanic speakers. However, there is also structure in R-M458 frequency in Germany itself, with lowest percentages reached in the north and west; this suggests an admixture with Baltic and/or Slavic elements in present-day Germany itself. 2. In several Balkan samples the frequency of R-M458 ranges between 0-12% which is at most a third of its maximum frequency, suggesting that the extent of Slavic admixture in the Balkans is upper-bounded by about 1/3. The complete absence of R-M458 in Italy and its sub-1% representation in Anatolia further support the idea that R-M458 in the Balkans is of medieval and later origins. 3. The samples from Greece (N=263), Macedonian Greeks (N=57), and Crete (N=361) have R-M458 frequency of 4.2, 8.8, and 2.2%. Assuming a frequency of R-M458 at 36.4% in ancestral Slavs, as in south Poland, the admixture estimates are 11.5, 24, 6%. These should probably be interpreted as upper limits (plus statistical margins) because the highest present-day frequency of R-M458 is probably lower than that in early Slavs. 4. Interestingly, the Slavs of FYROM have an R-M458 frequency of 3.8%, barely different from that of Greeks at large, suggesting that (i) the claims of some Greek nationalists that they Slavs of FYROM are newcomers to the Balkans are wrong, just as (ii) the claim of some FYROMian nationalists that they are markedly different from Greeks are wrong. The actual truth is that the Slavs of FYROM are largely of old Balkan (pre-Slavic) stock who adopted a non-Balkan Slavic language, just as the modern Turks are largely of old Anatolian (pre-Turkish) stock who adopted a non-Anatolian Turkic language. European Journal of Human Genetics doi:10.1038/ejhg.2009.194 http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurr... ********** Macedonians......Northern or Southern, Eastern or Western, are Closer than Most of us Care to Mention http://www.topix.com/forum/world/macedonia/TN... Who are the Slavicized Greeks of the Balkans! We are discussing ~4-6% of the genetic material in the Balkans (R-M458) is that not too small a sample to make these generalized conclusions of the remaining ~94-96% of the population? Or am I reading the results wrong?
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
Nick the Greek wrote: 4. Interestingly, the Slavs of FYROM have an R-M458 frequency of 3.8%, barely different from that of Greeks at large, suggesting that (i) the claims of some Greek nationalists that they Slavs of FYROM are newcomers to the Balkans are wrong, just as (ii) the claim of some FYROMian nationalists that they are markedly different from Greeks are wrong. The actual truth is that the Slavs of FYROM are largely of old Balkan (pre-Slavic) stock who adopted a non-Balkan Slavic language, just as the modern Turks are largely of old Anatolian (pre-Turkish) stock who adopted a non-Anatolian Turkic language. http://www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/vaop/ncurr... Conclusion 1: Old Balkan (Pre-Slavic) Indigenous population = Greek Hellenic or Derivative. Conclusion 2: Old Balkan (Pre-Slavic) Indigenous populations that Adopted a NoN Balkan Slavic Language = Slavicization. Slavic Genticist's have proven beyond a Reasonable doubt.....Certain portions of FYRoM's population carry Indigenous Autochthonous genetic marker's, not that disimilar to that of the Modern Greek population. Certain portions of FYRoM's population are More Greek Hellenic than They care to Mention! Personal Conclusion: Re-Hellenization...get back to base, It's the Only Way of Sharing the History and Heritage of the Greeks. The door Remains Open, Reject Slavdom and Return back to Fold. You Speak the Language of the Slavs, Not because you are Slavic but because your Greek Hellenic Ancestor's got Slavicized....probably by Force! http://www.topix.com/forum/world/macedonia/TN... Who are the Slavicized Greeks of the Balkans! We've drowned here into a sea of arbritary assumptions on your part,Nick! Pre-Slavics that is Hellenes ,what business did they ever have with the Slavs so as to be presented as being part of some continuum! 1-Since the Gothic Revolution against the Romans in the Thrace general vicinity many died and others fled. 2-The Byzantines did not mix with any Slavs till the 15th ce AD., and, as I demonstrate in my post here above,the whatever race-mixing that may have occured since the 15th ce does not even appear in DNA stats today! 3- can you define what a 'non balcan slavic language' would be? and how the speaking of that non-balcan slavic could have suddenly made Greeks abandon and forget their own language?and for what precise historical reason would these Greeks do that? If there is any evidence to support your claims, pls ,do post it! 4-your numerous posts do not make appear a strong , a highly significant prsence of a 'turco-mongol' DNA factor ,which historical research proves beyond any doubt.It ought to have appeared in the data you present but it is obstinantely absent! Ottoman time Skopjie was made up of Turkish population transfers [single men,turkish soldiers and Slav women]. http://www.youtube.com/watch... 5- The indigenous Greeks of FYROM [Greeks,Pelagonian Greeks,Greek-Vlachs] are still to this day a separate and, one might add, an abused and forgotten group of people by the very anti-Greek FYROM pseudo-macedonist political status quo. 6-which is that ' non-Anatolian turkish language'? And finally Nick,what are you trying to prove with all those ill-defined references here above?
|
|
“ein anderer Schauplatz”
Joined: Jan 29, 2009
Comments: 20540
Athens
|
Judged:
1
Dojran wrote: <quoted text> So how much do you want for your property????(not the stolen one, you will give that back to the rightful owners the Macedonians for free.), I hope you done a good job in the garden, I like them nice and tidy. p.s does the property come furnished or unfurnished?? I want all slav-scum bags to be put at their place! Are you not ashamed KOMITADJI NAZI to tell a Greek that resides on some stollen property and that it would belong to your Turcogypsy lot?
|
|
Nick the Greek
Brighton, UK
|
Hairamess wrote: <quoted text> We are discussing ~4-6% of the genetic material in the Balkans (R-M458) is that not too small a sample to make these generalized conclusions of the remaining ~94-96% of the population? Or am I reading the results wrong? Hairamess...... Genetics is a Specialist Area of Research. Interpretations of these findings I leave for the Experts..... Dienekes Pontikos has Specialist Expertise in this Field. FYRoMians are Slavicized Indigenous peoples...... Old Balkan populations = Pre-Slavic..... Old Balkan populations = Greek Hellenic or Derivative..... The Only reason They Speak the Slavic Language is because they got Slavicized in the 6th Century A.D.
|
|
|