NYAHAHAHAHAHAHA I PISSED HIM OFF WITH MY POST. LOLOLOLOLOLOL.<quoted text>
Did I says Japan vs China? I merely point out Japan lost a case where she claimed ownership of an atoll based on proximity i.e. UNCLOS. I think it may be USA who launched the complaint against Japan! Dumb Low IQ Pinoy!
Why apply to syariah court when one party is not a Moslem? Pretty DUMB, aren't you and you are not listening!
You still did not reply me why Britain dare not to bring Falkland to international court? AFRAID like you insinuate. Reply me and I show you the answer.
IT IS NOT RELEVANT and UNCLOS has NO JURISDICTION over dispute involving historical claim!
Next LOW IQ Pretending PINOY like you says I claim high IQ, I did not claimed. I based it on international finding, why are you so SCARE of the TRUTH! Ho Ho Ho
I WILL HAVE LEAVE SOON! IT IS FUN JESTING WITH LOWLIFE AND LOW IQ INDIVIDUALS LIKE YOU but man do needs CLOWN like you to make them feel GOOD and we perform better!
PNOY can SCREAM and CRIED for all you like but huangyan Island is over as far as thing is nwo. Aquino should have not tried to use that contentious issue to sway PUBLIC SUPPORT for himself hence putting PHILIPPINE in DANGER. China would not compromise until a more friendly and diplomatic President is ELECTED.
MEANWHILE if PINOY desire, better prepare for war with the USA support. China will battered you to piece if you dare for all the BRAVE WORDS! That is a REALITY, low IQ PINOY will never accepted.
GOOD RIDDANCE to all your RUBBISH!
1. You were the one who posted on the issue of senkaku. Why the hell would the US even file a case vs japan for china? Please use your brain. I thought you have high IQ. Where did your IQ go when you posted this?
I quote from wikipedia: "Since the transfer of administration from United States to Japan in 1971, ownership of the islands by Japan has been disputed by the People's Republic of China and the Republic of China (Taiwan)."
2. Why should i answer you about falklands? I don't care about that issue, and it's off topic. Does it help in China's claim? Does it help in the Philippines' claim? If not, then I don't give a damn.
3. What International finding are you talking about? The IQ study was commissioned by your government. Facts on how the data was gathered was not released to the public, for your information. It stinks of Chinese lies. LOL.
4. The lowlife here is you, I don't pretend to be anything I am not. Whereas you, bragging about your "high" IQ, has proven nothing in these forums except your stupidity. I mean, think about it: how can a high IQ person like you, be always defeated by a simple average IQed person like me? LOL.
5. Bye! Come again soon!:) I'll make fun of your posts and reveal you lies again next time around!:)
6. War? Okay.:) I'm looking forward to the time that we call China the United States of China. You know what you are showing the world? That you are like a bigger North Korea, a threat that needs to be taken care of.
7. In the meantime, while war has not yet broken out, please indulge yourself with Austronesian guy's posted evidences of the Philippines' proof of sovereignty. And at least try to rebutt them to the capacity of your "high" IQ.:)
I'm looking forward to your next defeat chinaman! Come again soon!!!:D