WW3 senario: Asia, Russia, S America v/s USA, Europe, Aust. who will win?

Mr Humbert wrote:

WW3 will be US Europe Russia vs China Australia Korea. I don't like your scenario. Russia will be our ally and Australia our enemy. The good guys will win thank god. Australia-China will be paying war reparations paying down our debt.

Australia is more caucasian oriented, and will side with the countries that have similar racial and cultural demographics. Meanwhile, the United States with its hatred of western civilisation and its desire to rid itself of anything to do with western civilisation, will side with any African or Mexican allied country.

You know how it is: Americans hate white people, and the remaining white people still in the United States are self-loathing people who won't breed in a new generation of white children.

Teaman wrote:

<quoted text>I know. That was meant for Humbert. Bring his rant back home to him. Maybe he's Paki. I've never heard an Indian talk like that.

I know mate

Fella wrote:

<quoted text>Australia is more caucasian oriented, and will side with the countries that have similar racial and cultural demographics. Meanwhile, the United States with its hatred of western civilisation and its desire to rid itself of anything to do with western civilisation, will side with any African or Mexican allied country.

You know how it is: Americans hate white people, and the remaining white people still in the United States are self-loathing people who won't breed in a new generation of white children.

?

Australian Bigot wrote:

<quoted text>
I rarely read the papers, our media are morons who go on their own crusades, they don't represent average Australians, just themselves.

Your papers so nothing unusual of the sort. Heck, our papers can do much worse, if not the UK/European press.))

Humbert is just a vile, illogical, shyte-slinging loon.

Mr Humbert wrote:

<quoted text>
ARRRRRRRRRRGHHHHHHHH! I READ YOUR proAustralian cutpaste propaganda 16 times now. Jesus I thought you rightwingers were patriot. Your boy Gingrich will lose. My President is looking better. Maybe he will win reelection. I hope so.

After you read the truth, move to the next step: comprehension. After this step, you won't be back here pushing your shyte. However, if you don't comprehend, I will keep re-posting until your brain finally gets it.

Gingrich may not get the GOP nomination. Probably not enough cash to counter the huge negative campaigns against him over the extended period. We'll see. He was/is a true mortal threat to Obama, so Romney and the GOP establishment (egged on by the dominant Democrat liberal media) had to spend millions to trash him, so that he may not be the Obama slayer. Despite Newt's unsavory private life history, his conservative views and vision to turn America around are too mortally dangerous to the Democrats. The Dems are/were scared shyteless by the prospect of a Newt-slaughter-of-Obama series of debates. The Democrats seem much happier now.....))

Romney has been craftily moulded into the GOP role by the Democrats too. The Democrats have been talking Romney up for months. ;) The GOP establishment + many GOP voters have thus been convinced that Romney is their winner.

Unfortunately, it's quite possible he will be beaten by Obama in the election. He is not as "starkly" different enough to the POTUS (compared to the other 3 the GOP candidates). Romney is just what the Democrats and 90% of our mainstream media want. They also like how "rich Romney" fits into Obama's divisive class warfare re-election strategy. Obama best concentrate on that since doemstically he nothing to boast about in his woeful 3+ years in office.

Yet, I'm happy with whichever nominated Republican wins the presidency in 2012. I like all. Santorum would be an ideal choice too. A real conservative with sound domestic and foreign policy ideas. But, he's lagging well behind.

I'm glad you love Obama so much, Humbert. Great decision on the joint US-Aussie military base in Darwin too.))

God bless the great US, Australian, Canadian, UK and wider western friendship.)

east shall rise wrote:

Asia has China and India military strength...need I say more?
Asia hands down...
Ofcourse now some foolish aussies will say australia is stronger...lol..ehhehehe

This thread is foolish. Russia is european, as european as the british and finns.

so the thread title is wrong

and south america is also euroepan dominated by spanish and italian europeans and mixedhalf europeans and sa indians.
So you failed in trying to divide europeans, europeans themselves do a better job at that than any asian.

Why do you Australians(ricj & fella) link anything and everything to race? Do you think military alliances are formed with racial ancestry as the basis? Hell No.

@ ricj & fella - Try posting your comments in the US and UK forums. Your comments will either be laughed at or neglected by the others; Or try to e-mail your comments to a defense expert in your own country - He/She won't even bother to waste those few seconds of their precious time. Inspite of the fact that most cubans are of "white iberian" ancestry, why are they at odds with the americans?? Get a life. Ofcourse this thread is as foolish as you two.

According to the current geo-strategic scenario, military alliances are divided into two groups (figuratively)-

Group 1: U.S, U.K, India, Israel, France, South Korea, Japan.

Group 2: China, Pakistan, North Korea, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Cuba, Venezuela.

By the way, according to a lab' result published by a group of australian genealogists, the gene frequencies of Iberians(Spaniards & Portugese) seem to be more afro-asiatic(berber-moorish/ar ab-north african) than Indo-European; While Iranians, Indians(Asian), Afghans & Kurds have shown a much higher incidence of the Indo-European DNA & antigens.

On a jovial note:- Have you forgotten the famous saying on Iberia?- "Europe ends at the Pyrenees(in France); Africa starts in Spain".

Mr Humbert wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice zinger. Deserve your 3 light bulbs. I'll give you another. Australians are living off China trade and US defense. Life is sweet for you now. When the shit goes down however and you know it will Australia will be raped by China and America will watch it on payperview and cheer.

You got your ass kicked by a Aussie didn't u cause you sound like a fat kid that gets picked on. What about the fact Aussie men have died for US just the same US men have died for Australia. We fight wars not because we like that country we do it for the right things and u shouldn't talk USA fights among them selfs about every major issue ??

Anzac wrote:

<quoted text>
You got your ass kicked by a Aussie didn't u cause you sound like a fat kid that gets picked on. What about the fact Aussie men have died for US just the same US men have died for Australia. We fight wars not because we like that country we do it for the right things and u shouldn't talk USA fights among them selfs about every major issue ??

me aapko aek tang ucha karke apna pura 7'ec ka daldunga or bohot der tak karuga

Amreeta wrote:

<quoted text>
me aapko aek tang ucha karke apna pura 7'ec ka daldunga or bohot der tak karuga

look there was ment to be nothing bad about that or racist but what is that ment to mean and I'm sorry if there was efence taken

Anzac wrote:

<quoted text>look there was ment to be nothing bad about that or racist but what is that ment to mean and I'm sorry if there was efence taken

He's a troll, never mind him.

Anzac wrote:

<quoted text> look there was ment to be nothing bad about that or racist but what is that ment to mean and I'm sorry if there was efence taken

aap toh apne hoosh hi kho bhaithe ho or puri tareh say behek gaye hoo, Dharam kehta h koi Insaan say decide nahi kar sakte k kown Heaven or kown hell jayega lakin aap ne toh khud ber khud yeh decide kar liya k hum Hell jayege.
Kitne sharam ki baat h aap logic say hatker mere swal ka jawab dene k bajai irrellivent batein kari ja rahe ho

MRW_83 wrote:

Why do you Australians(ricj & fella) link anything and everything to race? Do you think military alliances are formed with racial ancestry as the basis? Hell No.

Are you that friggin' stupid? Our historic ties are bound by racial background. Do you think there would be an alliance between Australia and the United States if the country of Australia was populated entirely by aborigines?

Fella wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you that friggin' stupid? Our historic ties are bound by racial background. Do you think there would be an alliance between Australia and the United States if the country of Australia was populated entirely by aborigines?

Yes, just like there are ties between Saudi Arabia and the US.

if there's a real war it'll go nuclear and we'll all be wiped out =\

I think it will be US, Britain, Aus and Europe vs China Russia and maybe some of the middle east countries. North Korea has not much consequence. China and india arn't even friends. Japan does what it is told by the US. But if their is going to be a world war the world will either be devastated or their will be a pause as both sides are practically the same strength

Asia should just unite and f*ck up the West.

F*cken arrogant whites need to be put down

Crusader wrote:

Asia should just unite and f*ck up the West.

F*cken arrogant whites need to be put down

Fail!

normal Aussie wrote:

<quoted text>
Fail!

We meet again, you ugly muder f.....

What ever happens i hope China gets wiped off the map.

I cant stand it when zipperheads go on about how strong china is when the only reason they have anything modern at all is because the White Man gave it to them.

Besides that theres the incompetence of the chinese government in mis-managing their country and allowing chinas population to become a burden on the rest of the world.

If theres over-population its because of the chinese and the indians. So it should be them who has to depopulate and no-one else.