Julian Assange supporters plan protests worldwide

Judged:

1

1

1

mikev483 wrote:

<quoted text>
i hope you lot perform better in bed than you did in the Olympics!

mikev483 wrote:

<quoted text>
i hope you lot perform better in bed than you did in the Olympics!

Judged:

2

1

1

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
I think it has become disturbingly clear that his main intention was to get famous.
As far as the wikileaks organisations goes: They did the western world a massive favour in exposing the disgusting actions of the US in particular.
If the USA can't deal with being viewed as they really are rather than the Disney version they try to sell everyone, tough.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ahomana wrote:

<quoted text>
You must forgive us (though we did not do too badly at all) because we were distracted keeping our economy going as one of the best in the world....
How is the British and Americans doing at the moment, I hope you have picked up?....it is all about priorities don't you think?

Judged:

1

1

1

Hugo 2Face wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not sure about the famous bit ... he seems to work too hard to be bothered by image.
But I totally agree about the value of Wikileaks in smashing Sleeping Beauty's mirror image of the US Gov. They will adapt and change no doubt, and put over another image but their strings are being pulled somewhere between the Middle East and China. The USA is no longer much interested in either Britain or Europe, probably notreally interested in the welfare of its own people either. It's all about Corporate supremacy and getting a large slice of the Global Pie. There is little to differentiate between the aims of American Gov. Inc and the rulers of West Africa. It's only the institutations that stand in their way, those that were created in an earlier more enlightened time. Freedom of the press and such like.

Judged:

1

1

1

Hugo 2Face wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not sure about the famous bit ... he seems to work too hard to be bothered by image.

Judged:

1

mikev483 wrote:

<quoted text>
why don't you crawl down from up your own arse and stop taking yourself so seriously? then people wont think you are such a smug git will they?

Judged:

1

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
You have to be kidding. What work?
I've only ever seen him self publicising.

E.g The NY times and the Guardian wanted to keep any sources and methods in the cables secret. They'd still expose the corruption and arrogance but without risking sources lives. Assange decided they were taking control, threw a hissy fit and then dumped all the records (without blacked out text) online.

A: More nonsensensical rambling.



He put peoples lives at risk purely to feed his ego.

Judged:

1

Ahomana wrote:

<quoted text>
A: There is absolutely no evidence of that but as you are complaining about that then why aren't you jumping up and down about this:
"A series of protests of varying levels of violence took place early in 2012 in response to the burning of Islamic religious material by soldiers from the United States of America Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. International condemnation followed the burning of copies of the Quran, on 22 February 2012, from the library that is used by inmates at the base's detention facility. The protests included domestic riots which caused at least 41 deaths and at least 270 injuries."
I could have shown evidence against all you speak but you have not bothered to seek the truth else you would know it.

Judged:

1

1

Lillim wrote:

<quoted text>More qurans should be burned.

Ahomana wrote:

<quoted text>
A: There is absolutely no evidence of that but as you are complaining about that then why aren't you jumping up and down about this:
"A series of protests of varying levels of violence took place early in 2012 in response to the burning of Islamic religious material by soldiers from the United States of America Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. International condemnation followed the burning of copies of the Quran, on 22 February 2012, from the library that is used by inmates at the base's detention facility. The protests included domestic riots which caused at least 41 deaths and at least 270 injuries."
I could have shown evidence against all you speak but you have not bothered to seek the truth else you would know it.

Judged:

1

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
There's no evidence that Assange released all the documents without redaction and put peoples lives at risk?
Other than the testimony of the editors of the NY times and the gaurdian, other than the admission of assange and other than the freedly available unedited documents?
You're right, there isn't much else.
AS for the rest of you post: What's your point? If soldiers in Afghanistan do something utterly stupid, that doesn't suddenly make Assange a better person.

Judged:

1

Lillim wrote:

<quoted text>What did the soldiers do?

Judged:

1

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>

Judged:

1

Clayton Rockwell wrote:

I think its funny how Julian Assange looks so much like the actor Liam Niesson.
Are they related?

Judged:

1

1

1

Ahomana wrote:

<quoted text>There's no evidence that Assange released all the documents without redaction and put peoples lives at risk?
Other than the testimony of the editors of the NY times and the gaurdian, other than the admission of assange and other than the freedly available unedited documents?
You're right, there isn't much else.
A: Are you talking about the editors of the three largest papers that along with Assange decided to release those files to the public!
I wonder what they would have to gain by laying all the blame on Assange?
AS for the rest of you post: What's your point? If soldiers in Afghanistan do something utterly stupid, that doesn't suddenly make Assange a better person.
A: It went to prove that the soldiers put the lives of their soldiers at risk where directly because of their actions they got six of their own killed...so where is your outrage!

Judged:

1

Ahomana wrote:

<quoted text>
There is no smugness and or seriousness just the reality pal. and you don't like that now anymore than you did when Assange and Wikileaks "brung it"
I think the governments take themselves too seriously and overide the will of the people and peoples....and as long as that is true, I will post it...
Don't like it, don't read it?
It is not like I can't be clearly idendified here troll?

Judged:

1

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
There's no evidence that Assange released all the documents without redaction and put peoples lives at risk?
Other than the testimony of the editors of the NY times and the gaurdian, other than the admission of assange and other than the freedly available unedited documents?
You're right, there isn't much else.
AS for the rest of you post: What's your point? If soldiers in Afghanistan do something utterly stupid, that doesn't suddenly make Assange a better person.