Families of Vietnamese martyrs to visit Truong Sa for memorial

Bankstown senior college wrote:

Vietnam government so Fake! Even the history are Fake. The soldiers died for what??????????

even bac ky vc commie vietnam map is fake
http://www.topix.com/forum/world/vietnam/TAU7...
commie vietnam stole phu quoc island from cambodia

hoang wrote:

chinh phu vietnam vi ngai lam phat long trung quoc ma khong dam vinh danh tat ca nhung chien sy da hy sinh de bao ve hoang sa va truong sa.

So dump on you! VN have no relate with those islands, so VN defeated. The martyrs died for greedy heart, and died for fake history.

Vietnam claims Nansha A. by alleging that it had discovered and then occupied and controlled it from the 17th Century. It also claimed that it had received it through succession from France. How could Vietnam have discovered Nansha A. when it was discovered by China some two thousand years previously? It is nonsense. By the 17th Century, Zheng He had already passed through Nansha A. at least two hundred years ago in the early 15th Century. There is plenty of evidence that Zheng had seen and therefore “discovered” Nansha A. even if there were any question about whether the Chinese had discovered it in the Han Dynasty. Therefore, Vietnam’s claim that it was the first ever to have discovered Nansha A. is obviously false and facetious and its claim of sovereignty due to discovery must of necessity also be false and facetious and untenable.

Australian wrote:

Vietnam claims Nansha A. by alleging that it had discovered and then occupied and controlled it from the 17th Century. It also claimed that it had received it through succession from France. How could Vietnam have discovered Nansha A. when it was discovered by China some two thousand years previously? It is nonsense. By the 17th Century, Zheng He had already passed through Nansha A. at least two hundred years ago in the early 15th Century. There is plenty of evidence that Zheng had seen and therefore “discovered” Nansha A. even if there were any question about whether the Chinese had discovered it in the Han Dynasty. Therefore, Vietnam’s claim that it was the first ever to have discovered Nansha A. is obviously false and facetious and its claim of sovereignty due to discovery must of necessity also be false and facetious and untenable.

.

you found it,,, or you seen it first,,, it doesn't mean that is belong to you,,

NANSHA,,SARA,SUSHI,,it doesn't matter what ever name they call,,. as long as it closer to vietnam then china,,.

that legally belong to vietnam,,according to the international law,,.

vietnam has asked China go away,, go to Africa,,BUT CHINA KEPT BEG VIETNAM GIVE THE A BID,,,

Vietnam has said no way,,.so what are china going to do now,,?

take the no for a result,,?

begging attituded wrote:

<quoted text>.
you found it,,, or you seen it first,,, it doesn't mean that is belong to you,,
NANSHA,,SARA,SUSHI,,it doesn't matter what ever name they call,,. as long as it closer to vietnam then china,,.
that legally belong to vietnam,,according to the international law,,.
vietnam has asked China go away,, go to Africa,,BUT CHINA KEPT BEG VIETNAM GIVE THE A BID,,,
Vietnam has said no way,,.so what are china going to do now,,?
take the no for a result,,?

Do you know Nansha away VN 210 nautical miles?
SECTION 2. LIMITS OF THE TERRITORIAL SEA
Article3
Breadth of the territorial sea
Every State has the right to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles, measured from baselines determined in accordance with this Convention.

http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreem ...

territorial sea is NOT EEZ, it is IMPOSSIBLE to claim territory with EEZ
S. China Sea - possession is nine-tenth of the law.

VN have no right to force china abandon the territories!

VN created some fake history!
Out there is Truong Sa (Spratly Islands), need 4 days to reach, by boat which go by walking stick. VN claim they can row the boat to 463km in 4 days. But in Olympic Game claim zero medal. It is not a sailing boat, It is http://www.panoramio.com/photo/41774370

Australian wrote:

VN have no right to force china abandon the territories!

.

yeah you are right,,

vietnam,,won't force China out of their territory,,in return,,vietnam hope that china will acting as a same way too.,,.

Australian wrote:

VN created some fake history!
Out there is Truong Sa (Spratly Islands), need 4 days to reach, by boat which go by walking stick. VN claim they can row the boat to 463km in 4 days. But in Olympic Game claim zero medal. It is not a sailing boat, It is http://www.panoramio.com/photo/41774370

.

you are creating some thing which it doesn't form any basic,.

it doesn't matter how long it take for vietnam boat,,ship,,sailing,,swimming to reaching there,,.

as long as those islands belong to them,,, then why would they hurry to get there ?

Some media reported that,,,TIBETAN people,,didn't want chinese occupied in their country,,and controlled them,,but why didn't chinese Authority respecting their requested ?

do you consider that china used their powered to abused them Monks,,?
is it a right acted or wrong,,?

Australian wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you know Nansha away VN 210 nautical miles?
SECTION 2. LIMITS OF THE TERRITORIAL SEA
Article3
Breadth of the territorial sea
Every State has the right to establish the breadth of its territorial sea up to a limit not exceeding 12 nautical miles, measured from baselines determined in accordance with this Convention.
http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreem ...
territorial sea is NOT EEZ, it is IMPOSSIBLE to claim territory with EEZ
S. China Sea - possession is nine-tenth of the law.

,.

there is no such as a name of NASHA,,NASAN,ISLANDS,.

As a neighbor friends,,,vietnam will holding they temptation very calm,,and willingly to negotiating with china along to the end of the lines,,regarding those disputed area at SEA,

BUT IN THE END,,there is no fair solution,,,then relationship on both side will meet a very difficulty,,i hope china respecting for that,,.

if a vietnam and china get in to any conflict,,, then 55 ETHNIC MINORITIES in side China WILL STANDING UP AND DEMANDING A SAME THING INCLUDING Tibet,,.

them i think CHINA greedy putting them in to this mess,,.
so watching out for a falling bricks china friends,,

beggar attitude wrote:

<quoted text>.
you are creating some thing which it doesn't form any basic,.
it doesn't matter how long it take for vietnam boat,,ship,,sailing,,swimming to reaching there,,.
as long as those islands belong to them,,, then why would they hurry to get there ?
Some media reported that,,,TIBETAN people,,didn't want chinese occupied in their country,,and controlled them,,but why didn't chinese Authority respecting their requested ?
do you consider that china used their powered to abused them Monks,,?
is it a right acted or wrong,,?

Vietnam claim the islands by these fake history http://biengioilanhtho.gov.vn/vie/phubientapl... (lequy-nd-4c4c7d9d.aspx
In the chinese written none of the islands call Truong Sa or Hoang Sa, Why in Vietnamese written added the words in? How did they go by boat to the dispute islands with foods and water? food for 6 months!!! The boat start at Quang Ngai, to paracel 135 nautical miles and to Spratly is over 250 nautical miles. How fake!!!!
It is not Paracel islands and not Spratly islands!

in 17th century the western sailors were professional sailors, when bad weather they get close to the mainland coast, so they couldnt hit Paracel islands or Spratly islands.
The western sailboat hit the islands close to VN coast: The western sailors have their rule to sail on the south china sea, when they sail to China they get close to Philippines, and when they exist they get close to Vietnam. Vietnam fake history said they hit the Paracel or Spratly islands is none sense, and hit every years is impossible too!

anti virus you are under nick Banktown college,frofessor and may be more so funnu ha....
you are real faker.....