Argentina still wants Falklands 30 years after war

Judged:

2

2

1

Ricardo wrote:

Ask yourself why the UK does not discuss anymore about historical legal rights and only talks about self determination

Judged:

1

1

1

Deanstreet wrote:

<quoted text>
The UK does not live in the past...
Kindest regards from the Falkland Islands

Judged:

1

1

1

Ricardo wrote:

This guy Braedon insists with "legal" arguments that not even the UK has raised officially ever for good reasons

Ricardo wrote:

The guy knows shit and yet speaks as an "expert"
But his insults and lowlife language betray him as the pathetic troll he is

Ricardo wrote:

Poor idiot talks constantly about the ICJ while the UK would not go to any court under any circumstances. The Foreign Office is well aware that they have no legal case.

Ricardo wrote:

So keep digging in history trying to find a pearl, moron...nobody is paying attention
That well is dry for the UK

Ricardo wrote:

Ask yourself why the UK does not discuss anymore about historical legal rights and only talks about self determination (which has no legal basis either but has an emotional appeal on uninformed people)

Judged:

1

1

1

Braedon wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe because it is argentina which spends every waking hour screaming about the "injustice" of having been unable to violently subjugate the Falklands as you did with every inch of argentina. It is the duty of whomever alleges injustice to take it to the relevant court, and seeing how argentina has never done this throughout the entirety of the ICJ's existence, it seems clear your government is well aware of just how weak your pathetic claim is
<quoted text>
Awww, is another crybaby upset that I mentioned some basic truths about your "heros"?
Sorry, but I see no reason to show any respect for those who still scream about the "unfairness" of the fact they were unable to violently subjugate thousands of innocent islanders.
Fascist worshiping pussies like your veterans perfectly demonstrate full well your nation's sickening contempt for basic human rights of those in the way of your pathetic delusions of grandeur, as well as your utter cowardice when faced with an enemy which can fight back. The fact you worship them as heroes makes you wholly worthy of my amused contempt
<quoted text>
Apart from twice in the 60s which argentina promptly ran away like a coward, and despite several offers since 1945 you have continued to act with characteristic spinelessness in fleeing any chance of showing your case to an actual court.
<quoted text>
Exactly, no one cares about your third world shithole's pathetic obsession with our territory. That's why not one single nation has taken any economic, diplomatic, political, military or financial measures against the UK or the Islanders, unless you count that hilariously failed "blockade" against the Islanders a measure (despite all nations involved instantly telling the islanders that it was purely symbolic)
<quoted text>
As i said before, why do we need to? it is argentina's duty as it whines like a bitch about injustice, to take the case to court. As your nation lacks the spine to do so we can happily ignore you like the sad little joke that you are.
But by all means, provide the legal sources (ICJ/UN statute, ICJ precedents, UN charter articles) and historical sources to prove me wrong

Judged:

1

1

1

Braedon wrote:

<quoted text>
You mean the uninformed (and inconsequential) opinions of individuals over 100 years after 1833? I am aware that as a delusional third world shithole, your education system must be beyond appalling, but do try to keep up.
The only sources which could prove your claims, or disprove my arguments, are the ones which were created at the time of the relevant incidents (1833, 1850 etc.)
so far not a single argentine has provided a single historical source. Which makes it all the more clear of just how utterly pathetic you claim is.
Now if you have a problem with that, then kindly provide the historical sources (from the time of relevant events and yeas like 1833, not 100 years afterwards) which utterly demonstrate that
a) Britain directly and officially renouncing it's claim on the Falklands before 1833
b) Spain having full and uncontested sovereignty over the Falklands before argentine independance
c) the Falklands being an integrated part of argentina... despite Spain having utterly seperated it's claim on the Falklands from argentina, as evidenced by spain having a seperate governor for both argentina and the Falklands
d) Jewett having been ordered to carry out an official claim on the Falklands on behalf of argentina, which argentina's government verified on his return
e) Vernet had zero dealings with the British government
f) all of Vernet's settlers were expelled in 1833
g) argentina did not renounce pretenses of sovereignty in 1850... despite having officially stated "it had no dispute with the UK on any issue"
are all 100% true.
Plus you will have to cite the legal precedents and statutes which show
a) the Islanders have zero right to self determination, despite it being conferred upon them by the UN charter, the ICJ mandates and precedents, and the universal declaration of human rights.
b) why Britain's taking the Falklands was somehow "illegal" while argentina's infinitely more brutal conquest of every one of it's current territories was somehow "legal".
c) that the Falklands, despite never having been an integrated or vital part of argentina in it's entire history, are somehow "integral" to argentina's existance

Judged:

1

1

1

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
Those guys get about £211 a month.

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
Could you stop replying to that vernet guy please?
If you stop replying it might mean he stops posting and we all won't have to waste time every day scrolling past his cut and paste bullshit.
I truly don't understand why you would go to the bother of translating it.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ricardo wrote:

<quoted text>
This just confirms that you are only here for trolling
To enter a Forum determined not to read posts is just that
Go fight to a pub or something

allymac wrote:

<quoted text>How many argie draft dodgers are with you in Canada?Do you ever think of going back to your homeland?

supersonic boom wrote:

<quoted text>
Mrs. T may be suffering now, but when you took the Falkland Islands by force she was the toughest woman in the world. She certainly knew how to whip your arses.

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
So to clarify your point:
Argentinaians kill 300,000 native americans and take over their land and that's fine.
If argentinaians killed 3,000 falkalnd islanders to take over their land that would be fine.
When British people reaffirmed their ownership of their land from 150 Argentinian squatters but didn't even evict them, that was piracy?
Might I suggest you might be ever so slightly biased?

Judged:

1

1

1

I can read wrote:

<quoted text>
Bullshit.
1982 Fatima Whitbread would have kicked 1982 Thatchers' ass.
Now if you'll excuse me I have to go wash my imagination out with soap.

Jake Rockwell wrote:

Everything that could be said, has been said here. It will change nothing.. The Falkland Islands will remain British as long as the people there wish to.
The economy here seems to be doing well at the moment, much better than 300 miles away where they are nationalizing oil companies!
It is hard to see the people of the Falkland Islands ever wanting to be part of Argentina after they were attacked also.

Prince Harry wrote:

You Argentines need to be reminded what will happen to the Argentine if you try your stupid stunts again. Its provinces will be distributed as follows:
Misiones, Corrientes to Brazil.
Formosa to Paraguay.
Salta, Jujuy to Bolivia.
Entre Rios to Uruguay.
Tierra del Fuego, Los Andes to Chile.
Patagonia (Santa Cruz, Chubut, Rio Negro south of the Rio Negro) will become the Mapuche republic of Patagonia.
Buenos Aires, La Pampa, Rio Negro north of the Rio Negro, Neuquen will all be occupied by the British, for ten years, as the Viceroyalty of the River Plate. They can then have free elections on their future.
The rest (Santa Fe, Cordoba, San Luis, Mendoza, San Juan, La Rioja, Catamarca, Tucuman, Santiago del Estero, El Chaco) will become the independent republic of Pampakuna.

Braedon wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe because it is argentina which spends every waking hour screaming about the "injustice" of having been unable to violently subjugate the Falklands as you did with every inch of argentina. It is the duty of whomever alleges injustice to take it to the relevant court, and seeing how argentina has never done this throughout the entirety of the ICJ's existence, it seems clear your government is well aware of just how weak your pathetic claim is
<quoted text>
Awww, is another crybaby upset that I mentioned some basic truths about your "heros"?
Sorry, but I see no reason to show any respect for those who still scream about the "unfairness" of the fact they were unable to violently subjugate thousands of innocent islanders.
Fascist worshiping pussies like your veterans perfectly demonstrate full well your nation's sickening contempt for basic human rights of those in the way of your pathetic delusions of grandeur, as well as your utter cowardice when faced with an enemy which can fight back. The fact you worship them as heroes makes you wholly worthy of my amused contempt
<quoted text>
Apart from twice in the 60s which argentina promptly ran away like a coward, and despite several offers since 1945 you have continued to act with characteristic spinelessness in fleeing any chance of showing your case to an actual court.
<quoted text>
Exactly, no one cares about your third world shithole's pathetic obsession with our territory. That's why not one single nation has taken any economic, diplomatic, political, military or financial measures against the UK or the Islanders, unless you count that hilariously failed "blockade" against the Islanders a measure (despite all nations involved instantly telling the islanders that it was purely symbolic)
<quoted text>
As i said before, why do we need to? it is argentina's duty as it whines like a bitch about injustice, to take the case to court. As your nation lacks the spine to do so we can happily ignore you like the sad little joke that you are.
But by all means, provide the legal sources (ICJ/UN statute, ICJ precedents, UN charter articles) and historical sources to prove me wrong