Sikh religion viewed unfavorably in B.C.

May 20, 2009 Full story: Vancouver Sun 11,031

A new poll shows British Columbians are not nearly as favorably disposed to some religions, particularly Sikhism , as many would expect.

Full Story
The Truth

Abbotsford, Canada

#7962 Aug 16, 2012
lullah hu akbarrrrrr wrote:
many hindu jhandus and
mulla sullas r on dis thread venting out there jealousy for sikhism
but d truth is
muhammad had sex wid a 9 year old
hindu god ganesh is made of crap SHIT
tell me if i m wrong
Sounds right to me,

Guru Nanak was banging a 13 or 14 year old as well, wasn't he?

Wasn't his wife only around 13 when he married?

Obviously 9 is worse, but 13 is pretty bad, viewed from today.
aaa

East Ham, UK

#7963 Aug 16, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds right to me,
Guru Nanak was banging a 13 or 14 year old as well, wasn't he?
Wasn't his wife only around 13 when he married?
Obviously 9 is worse, but 13 is pretty bad, viewed from today.
He 18 years old here's the link
http://www.google.co.uk/url...
aaa

East Ham, UK

#7964 Aug 16, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds right to me,
Guru Nanak was banging a 13 or 14 year old as well, wasn't he?
Wasn't his wife only around 13 when he married?
Obviously 9 is worse, but 13 is pretty bad, viewed from today.
By the way wasn’t Mary 13 or 14 when she gave birth to Jesus?
What GOD would send out the Holy Spirit to have sex with a child?

she was screwing around wasn't she.
The Truth

Abbotsford, Canada

#7965 Aug 16, 2012
aaa wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way wasn’t Mary 13 or 14 when she gave birth to Jesus?
What GOD would send out the Holy Spirit to have sex with a child?
she was screwing around wasn't she.
Could be.
PrimatIve child brides.

I think I see a pattern here.
Didn't they have any women around in those days?
lullah hu akbarrr

United States

#7966 Aug 16, 2012
aaa wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way wasn’t Mary 13 or 14 when she gave birth to Jesus?
What GOD would send out the Holy Spirit to have sex with a child?
she was screwing around wasn't she.
seems tru

as of guru nanak dev g
15-16 year olds were married ALL OVER D WORLD

and he married a 16 year old
which is perfectly alright

but suckers like d one wid usernamr "the truth" will write self-imagined fallacies about anybody

wat about muhammad having sex wid a 9 year old (9 is d age generally considered for consummation of d marriage
AISHA was 7 year old when married to muhammad
and dis savagery by muhammad is unparalleled)
The Truth

Abbotsford, Canada

#7967 Aug 16, 2012
lullah hu akbarrr wrote:
<quoted text>
seems tru
as of guru nanak dev g
15-16 year olds were married ALL OVER D WORLD
and he married a 16 year old
which is perfectly alright
but suckers like d one wid usernamr "the truth" will write self-imagined fallacies about anybody
wat about muhammad having sex wid a 9 year old (9 is d age generally considered for consummation of d marriage
AISHA was 7 year old when married to muhammad
and dis savagery by muhammad is unparalleled)
I guess it is in dispute amongst Sikhs.

Sihk wiki say this:

"Bhai Jai Ram was resident of Khanpur and was in the service of Nawab Daulat Khan. For his official work, he used to go to Pakhoke village. There he talked to Baba Mool Chand for the marriage of his daughter, and he readily agreed to it. Guru Nanak was engaged on Visak 5, 1542, vs, and the marriage took place on Harh 24, 1544 (1487 AD) vs. Guru Nanak was 18 years old at the time of marriage." Sulakhani must have been about 14.

Sikhs and Muslims are constantly arguing about the crazy parts of their religions, what good does it do?

Just pointing out that it was a nutty, primatIve time.

Seems like the records are questionable or made up on all sides anyway.
Winnie Wu
#7968 Aug 16, 2012
Manveer wrote:
<quoted text>How many did you win? Btw, the Chinese were caught cheating in a couple of rents and had several warnings in other ones. A few Silver medal wins by them were followed by a show of poor sportsmanship. These are the people you're writing so highly of..?
we are not cheating,in fact,4 gold medals were toke away by brits withour no reason.

since chinese don't against you,i don't know why you come here to insult us.

we don't care about your indians with whites problem,since i met a HUGE of indians work in our beijing city,they keep saying they are not asians but whites,same ancesotrs with europeans,so,i see you as a white.

Chinese only want to be proud be a east asian,a yellow race,we win the 87 medals by our hardworks.even i don't agree the way they training.
Indian Says

Sydney, Australia

#7969 Aug 16, 2012
Winnie Wu wrote:
<quoted text>
we are not cheating,in fact,4 gold medals were toke away by brits withour no reason.
since chinese don't against you,i don't know why you come here to insult us.
we don't care about your indians with whites problem,since i met a HUGE of indians work in our beijing city,they keep saying they are not asians but whites,same ancesotrs with europeans,so,i see you as a white.
Chinese only want to be proud be a east asian,a yellow race,we win the 87 medals by our hardworks.even i don't agree the way they training.
Indians are the biggest liars.
ALL INDIANS ARE LIARS, None of them are Europeans.

SEE THE BONY STRUCTURE OF A EUROPEAN RACE SAMLE AND COMPARE IT WITH AN dirty , short , black ,shrivilled , unfit lying Indian.

In India ALL THE INDIANS ARE TAUGHT that
1.Chinese attacked India

2.Chinese are less than a dog and they took millions of square kilometre of indian land,

3.Indians call Chinese with names like flatty ( flat face slit eyes)and chapta.
4. There are No Indians allowed to live or work in India, they are tortured or looted.
You can verify this by going yourself to India, if you get a Indian visa
Manveer

Surrey, Canada

#7970 Aug 17, 2012
BuckFurnaby wrote:
There is a double standard that is happening in this country.
http://news.ca.msn.com/local/britishcolumbia/ ...
Somehow they can have soccer tournaments that LIMITS the amount of white Canadians allowed on a team.
Can white people build a European-Canadian soccer tournament and limit the amount of non-Caucasians on a team?
These people call it, "....wanting to bring together young South Asian migrants or descendants of South Asian migrants to promote sport, participation and culture."
You see if white people said the exact same thing as these "Indo-Canadians", they would be called racist!!!
The intention isn't wrong (trying to promote diversity) but the method of applying it is wrong
Manveer

Surrey, Canada

#7971 Aug 17, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess it is in dispute amongst Sikhs.
Sihk wiki say this:
"Bhai Jai Ram was resident of Khanpur and was in the service of Nawab Daulat Khan. For his official work, he used to go to Pakhoke village. There he talked to Baba Mool Chand for the marriage of his daughter, and he readily agreed to it. Guru Nanak was engaged on Visak 5, 1542, vs, and the marriage took place on Harh 24, 1544 (1487 AD) vs. Guru Nanak was 18 years old at the time of marriage." Sulakhani must have been about 14.
Sikhs and Muslims are constantly arguing about the crazy parts of their religions, what good does it do?
Just pointing out that it was a nutty, primatIve time.
Seems like the records are questionable or made up on all sides anyway.
I'm pretty sure back in medieval times men 30 years old used to marry 13 year olds in Europe... This was the norm back then so Guru Nanak Dev Ji's marriage was considered normal both in India and Europe.
Manveer
#7972 Aug 17, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds right to me,
Guru Nanak was banging a 13 or 14 year old as well, wasn't he?
Wasn't his wife only around 13 when he married?
Obviously 9 is worse, but 13 is pretty bad, viewed from today.
Guru Nanak had his first son at 24, recreational sex is frowned upon in India ESPECIALLY back then. Also since nothing anywhere close to condoms existed we can assume Guru Nanak didn't have sex until 24.
Nazir

Melbourne, Australia

#7973 Aug 17, 2012
Manveer wrote:
<quoted text>Guru Nanak had his first son at 24, recreational sex is frowned upon in India ESPECIALLY back then. Also since nothing anywhere close to condoms existed we can assume Guru Nanak didn't have sex until 24.
guru nank hindu ka guru musalman ka peer
lullah hu akbarrr
#7974 Aug 17, 2012
Manveer wrote:
<quoted text>Guru Nanak had his first son at 24, recreational sex is frowned upon in India ESPECIALLY back then. Also since nothing anywhere close to condoms existed we can assume Guru Nanak didn't have sex until 24.
sure guru nanak dev g wasnt a pedophile like muhammad who married a 7 year old child and banged her at d age of 9
The Truth
#7976 Aug 17, 2012
Manveer wrote:
<quoted text>Guru Nanak had his first son at 24, recreational sex is frowned upon in India ESPECIALLY back then. Also since nothing anywhere close to condoms existed we can assume Guru Nanak didn't have sex until 24.
So he waited 10 years before consummating his marriage.
He definitely had will power.

I guess he did not want children for quite a while.
Which is commendable, especially with the population crisis in India.
Serpent

Calgary, Canada

#7977 Aug 17, 2012
Winnie Wu wrote:
<quoted text>
i met a HUGE of indians work in our beijing city,they keep saying they are not asians but whites,same ancesotrs with europeans,so,i see you as a white.
Indians can't build there own country so they crawl into other peoples countries to try to make a living. They can't build sh^t so maybe that's why to go to Beijing and other countries.
Oh, they are not white, do not insult the white race by calling them white.
lullah hu akbarrr

United States

#7978 Aug 17, 2012
The Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
So he waited 10 years before consummating his marriage.
He definitely had will power.
I guess he did not want children for quite a while.
Which is commendable, especially with the population crisis in India.
yes it is much more commendable than muhammad marrying a 7-year old child
and raping her sexually at age of 9
The Truth

Abbotsford, Canada

#7979 Aug 17, 2012
There is no Muslim, there is no Hindu, there is no Sikh.

Try to get along, hey fellows.
The Truth

Abbotsford, Canada

#7980 Aug 17, 2012
No surprise,
India, the Punjab, Pakistan and of course the Muslim Nations are the centre of child brides.

Why oh why do entire countries take part in this behavior.

One report I read said 1 in 5 Indian brides are underage.

Crazy culture indeed!
The Truth

Abbotsford, Canada

#7981 Aug 17, 2012
That's 1 in 5 under the age of 15

Wow

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#7982 Aug 17, 2012
I don't care what religion they are, if they're from India, Pakistan, or anywhere else in Asia, they are PERVERTS. India has the highest child molestation rate than any other country in the world. CHILD SEX SLAVERY is a serious issue in Asian countries.
50% of all Indian children have been molested.

THAT'S JUST SICK!

Asian people are just the lowest scum on this planet. Criminals by far and large.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

World News Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Russia's top 20 lies about Ukraine (Jun '14) 3 min Pro-Ukraine 3,004
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 5 min Earthling-1 33,470
Islam Will Conquer Italy and the Entire West (Sep '10) 8 min bmz 391,223
No Muslim can think of profaning holy Prophet (... (Jan '11) 12 min HAJI KAJI 52,529
Pressure at summit grows to ease EU sanctions a... 18 min Zeppelin 1
Japanese space explorer to blow crater in asteroid 21 min Ainu 200
Ukrainian Nationalism Has A Long History of Bru... 23 min Pro Ukraine 8
LDS Apostle visited Tonga (Feb '14) 1 hr NoMo 26,957
More from around the web