Russia's Medvedev says US missile shield plans complicate arms balance

Obama of course will continue to push the missle shield into Poland and out of the other side of his mouth talk about Reducing nuclear arms... It just sounds like the USA wants to control everything and expects te world to trust them with all of the power... It looks like the arms race is on as Russia cannot tolerate missles on its borders...and those nuclear talks are just posturing on the part of Obama...

Stefanya wrote:

Obama of course will continue to push the missle shield into Poland and out of the other side of his mouth talk about Reducing nuclear arms... It just sounds like the USA wants to control everything and expects te world to trust them with all of the power... It looks like the arms race is on as Russia cannot tolerate missles on its borders...and those nuclear talks are just posturing on the part of Obama...

So you really think Russia can compete against the west or even the USA in an arms race :

HA HA....ya right.

So a dog walks up to you and says, "Go Russia, Go Medvedev!" LOL

Stefanya wrote:

Obama of course will continue to push the missle shield into Poland and out of the other side of his mouth talk about Reducing nuclear arms... It just sounds like the USA wants to control everything and expects te world to trust them with all of the power... It looks like the arms race is on as Russia cannot tolerate missles on its borders...and those nuclear talks are just posturing on the part of Obama...

Our presidaent changes his point of view depending on his latest advisor. We were promised a new start with russia, an "end to the Bush's war." what we got was a 3 trillion dollar debt to start off with, a war intenesified in afganistan, and a continued provokation of a well armed superpower across the pacific. Bush was no better but at least he said what he would do, and you couuld take it or leave it. the new guys says one thing, like "the end of the war and troops come home," then you have to decifer his real meaning, oh that war but not that war, by home you mean stay in irak but not in combat. it gets very tricky to tell what he/they really mean. i'll bet medvedev is already taking our new administration with a grain of salt. i'll say it agian, the old one was blatantly aggressive, but honest about it. these new people are like car salesmen.

Well russia.If you think the balance of nuclear weapons is not right,just go and deploy another 100 nuclear suberines.At least with suberines you can take your nuclear weapons any where in the world.Concentrate in building up you navy.

tyquniaum wrote:

Well russia.If you think the balance of nuclear weapons is not right,just go and deploy another 100 nuclear suberines.At least with suberines you can take your nuclear weapons any where in the world.Concentrate in building up you navy.

The problem with that is most Russian subs end up at the bottom of the ocean. Alaska has a few of them polluting our waters with nuclear waste for the fact they were too deep for the Russians to salvage.

Ask any Russian about "Kursk". Russians and the ocean were never a good mix. Leave that to the US, UK, and Aussies. I believe it's a "Anglo - Saxon / Viking thing".

:)

Why_Me wrote:

<quoted text>
The problem with that is most Russian subs end up at the bottom of the ocean. Alaska has a few of them polluting our waters with nuclear waste for the fact they were too deep for the Russians to salvage.
Ask any Russian about "Kursk". Russians and the ocean were never a good mix. Leave that to the US, UK, and Aussies. I believe it's a "Anglo - Saxon / Viking thing".
:)

Paranoid russians say that NATO sink the Kursk. Do you agree?

Lukashenko is Dr Phil wrote:

<quoted text>
Paranoid russians say that NATO sink the Kursk. Do you agree?

The "Kursk" was 100% Russian Horde technology at it's finest.

HA HA

Why_Me wrote:

<quoted text>
The "Kursk" was 100% Russian Horde technology at it's finest.
HA HA

Google "USS Tresher" if you want to know about US technology at its finest.

HA, HA !!!

Maybe you think that the US have never lost submarines? You are a complete idiot!

Jazz singer wrote:

<quoted text>
Google "USS Tresher" if you want to know about US technology at its finest.
HA, HA !!!
Maybe you think that the US have never lost submarines? You are a complete idiot!

The Thresher was build between 1958 and 1960. If you want to compare US subs vs Russian subs to see who has more laying at the bottom of the ocean than let's do it. Russian subs are notorious for spending the remainder of their days laying at the bottom of the ocean filling the seas full of nuclear waste. You couldn't pay me enough money to be a Russian submariner.

New Russian 4th generation Borei class is the best sub out there so there's no point in arguing here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borei_class

Chuck wrote:

New Russian 4th generation Borei class is the best sub out there so there's no point in arguing here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borei_class

Umm ya great sub. There's a grand total of one of these tubs, and it has yet to go through any sea trails not to mention they have had a fair amount of issues with it. Russian technology always looks good on paper as far as planes and subs go, but when it comes time to prove themselves they usually are a flop.

Why_Me wrote:

<quoted text>
... You couldn't pay me enough money to be a Russian submariner.

Could someone pay you enough money to be an American Astronaut?

Bycha wrote:

<quoted text>
Could someone pay you enough money to be an American Astronaut?

Wasn"t Yuri Gagarin from Smolensk? No wonder Gagaring had a mongol asian face of the Golden Hord just look

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yuri_Gagari...

He looks like a real Golden Horde genuine russian mongol asian, now doesn"t he?

Bycha wrote:

<quoted text>
Could someone pay you enough money to be an American Astronaut?

No actually they could not. Nothing against NASA technology but h*ll would freeze over before I ever considered going to space.

If I had my wishes, I would be in a Minsk night club right now (single).

:)

Why_Me wrote:

<quoted text>
No actually they could not. Nothing against NASA technology but h*ll would freeze over before I ever considered going to space.
If I had my wishes, I would be in a Minsk night club right now (single).
:)

Hy there! whats new?

ana 8 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hy there! whats new?

Hi, Anna...We have missed you..hope everything is o.k.????

Chuck wrote:

New Russian 4th generation Borei class is the best sub out there so there's no point in arguing here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borei_class

yep!!! those russian submariners give new meaning to "drowning in your work"..

Small Town America wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi, Anna...We have missed you..hope everything is o.k.????

HEllO STA!!!!!!!!!! Yes everything is OK. Lots of work at work and at home. Have to get my dogs in shape. THey are all a bit overweight. I have 5 of them now with two boys that I left for myself from the litter. Getting them trained for the upcomming shows. But thats just half of the story. My daughter had an exident and smashed my car. She is OK bu the car is gone. Goody. I am getting a van this time.
How things are here? How are you? How is everybody? Is forums idiot still here? You know who I am talking about....LOL

ana 8 wrote:

<quoted text>
Hy there! whats new?

Privet Ana :) Sorry to hear about your car...but I am glad everything is ok with your daughter. So how was Ukraine ?