Do we want 'Odd Couple' in office?

You'll notice this "professor" at VC"C" won't recite one Barack Hussein Obama position, because if he did he'd turn off the 10% undecideds. In place of political platforms, he gives us "truth", "intellectual depth" as reasons to follow BH0. Here let me help you, "professor": pro-abortion, anti--Isreal, higher taxes, gov't health care, weak military and activist judges.

And here's a quote for your symbiotic lawyer tag team: " A lawyer is someone willing to spend every cent you own to prove he's right."

An F For You wrote:

You'll notice this "professor" at VC"C" won't recite one Barack Hussein Obama position, because if he did he'd turn off the 10% undecideds. In place of political platforms, he gives us "truth", "intellectual depth" as reasons to follow BH0. Here let me help you, "professor": pro-abortion, anti--Isreal, higher taxes, gov't health care, weak military and activist judges.
And here's a quote for your symbiotic lawyer tag team: " A lawyer is someone willing to spend every cent you own to prove he's right."

Perhaps you need anger management training.

Bravo, excellent letter. McCain-Palin are painful to watch.

An F For You wrote:

You'll notice this "professor" at VC"C" won't recite one Barack Hussein Obama position, because if he did he'd turn off the 10% undecideds. In place of political platforms, he gives us "truth", "intellectual depth" as reasons to follow BH0. Here let me help you, "professor": pro-abortion, anti--Isreal, higher taxes, gov't health care, weak military and activist judges.
And here's a quote for your symbiotic lawyer tag team: " A lawyer is someone willing to spend every cent you own to prove he's right."

And let me define "maverick" for you, Einstein: Someone who can't get along with anyone. If the shoe fits...

An F For You wrote:

You'll notice this "professor" at VC"C" won't recite one Barack Hussein Obama position, because if he did he'd turn off the 10% undecideds. In place of political platforms, he gives us "truth", "intellectual depth" as reasons to follow BH0. Here let me help you, "professor": pro-abortion, anti--Isreal, higher taxes, gov't health care, weak military and activist judges.
And here's a quote for your symbiotic lawyer tag team: " A lawyer is someone willing to spend every cent you own to prove he's right."

Hey, you kids, get off my lawn. Bah, humbug. When I was a boy, we...

Where is the poster wrong?

No McSame wrote:

<quoted text>
Perhaps you need anger management training.
Bravo, excellent letter. McCain-Palin are painful to watch.

PencilThin wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey, you kids, get off my lawn. Bah, humbug. When I was a boy, we...

PERFECT description!

Lets' see if we can figure this out: Left wing liberal Democrat posts anti-McCain/Palin letter and fellow left wing liberal Democrat bloggers stand around to pick at dissenters like hyenas circling a lion kill, eager to snatch a bite of the fresh meat and blood.

I've read many a post that was pure "merde du taureau" but this reference to Plato as if Plato's view on the perfect candidate was a blueprint for us all to follow tops the cake.

I think the real "odd couple" is a young, no experience negro with a checkered past association with some very radical characters running with a hack career politician who was almost a no show when he ran in the primaries.

Palin and McCain offer a combination of great experience along with a counterpart who offers an identity with millions of middle class families and their problems. This, to me, is a great balance - someone right there to say to McCain, "Wait, this is how American middle class Mom's and wives' feel about this".
Sarah Palin is no less qualified for this office than many who have held the top post and more qualified than many, and particularly more qualified to lead in an executive post than Barry, Barack Hussein Obama.

Where is the poster wrong?

No McSame wrote:

<quoted text>
PERFECT description!

Grandma Fudd wrote:

Lets' see if we can figure this out: Left wing liberal Democrat posts anti-McCain/Palin letter and fellow left wing liberal Democrat bloggers stand around to pick at dissenters like hyenas circling a lion kill, eager to snatch a bite of the fresh meat and blood.
I've read many a post that was pure "merde du taureau" but this reference to Plato as if Plato's view on the perfect candidate was a blueprint for us all to follow tops the cake.
I think the real "odd couple" is a young, no experience negro with a checkered past association with some very radical characters running with a hack career politician who was almost a no show when he ran in the primaries.
Palin and McCain offer a combination of great experience along with a counterpart who offers an identity with millions of middle class families and their problems. This, to me, is a great balance - someone right there to say to McCain, "Wait, this is how American middle class Mom's and wives' feel about this".
Sarah Palin is no less qualified for this office than many who have held the top post and more qualified than many, and particularly more qualified to lead in an executive post than Barry, Barack Hussein Obama.

In case you haven't noticed, your ancient bigotry beliefs are dead.

Palin is not only less qualified, like old man McCain, she's pretty darn stupid - she 6 colleges, he graudating bottom of his class.

FOREIGN POLICY: "I can see Russia from my window and I don't read."

FAMILY VALUES: "My husband never went to college, I attended 6 and my daughter is following in our footsteps, unwed, pregnant teenager, shotgun marriage and promising no further education past high school. My children will proudly be burger flippers the rest of their lives."

The $150,000 wardrobe make the Republican party the laughing stock of main street! Desginer shoes don't mask her beehive hairdo menatality.

I believe you have mistaken Lord Balack Hussein Obungholeus for Tiger Woods. It's possible you have been watching way too much American Idol. Take your prozac and go back to bed.

A college professor in the US, so ignorant that he doesn't know we vote for a president, not a philosopher king.

I for one would like it if a nominee for the second most powerful position in government, when asked what her job responsibilities would be if elected (Answer: As the President Pro Tem of the U.S. Senate, cast the deciding vote in cases of tie votes in the Senate, and if necessary, become President in case of her predecessors' death, physical imparement or removal from office) could answer the question correctly. After all, as I just noted, she'd only have 2 duties. How hard could it be to remember that?

Who gives a ratz azz about Plato. If you want higher taxes and a socialist agenda Vote for Obamanation, otherwise Vote McCain. He has a record of doing things, not talking about them.

John Scolaro,

You are an elitist snob and a closet socialist.

I could be wrong about this. You might not be in the closet.

Agreed! As a Republican, I voted for Obama because I care about my country and the future of those who live here. Once the Republicans can nominate someone with true Republican ideals of small government and defense (not Iraq who had no hand in 9-11), I will be thrilled to vote Republican again. Until then, Obama is the man. He has got his head on straight, and he has proven that he is not going to be shaken up easily. He is steady, and will be a great leader.

You are a professor at our local college? No wonder our kids are screwed up. Obama has no qualifications to be President, and it will be a very sad day in Amercan history when and if he becomes President.

By The way in case you are to dumb and blind to know it Katie Curack edited the interview tapes with Sarah Palin to make it look like she did not know what she was doing. Why don't the show the entire interview without editing and then you can see our great media at it's best.

Shame on you Kate Curick!!!

2001 Public Raidio interview - Barry weighs in again on REDISTRIBUTION of WEALTH. He means it, people. If you work hard, prepare to be robbed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

media bias abounds is right

Obama doesn't like the Constitution as it is. He complains that it only says what the government do to us. He calls this "negative liberties". And it doesn't say enough about what the government can do TO us.

It's stunning stuff. Watch the video. Wake up before it's too late.