Local News: Syosset, NY 

 | 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment

The Dixie Chicks

"The" remark . . .

Posted in the The Dixie Chicks Forum

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of52
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
texnative

Arlington, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Apr 27, 2009
 
You know what's so hilarious about the whole debate over Natalies' trivial remark about Bush?

GW himself was the one person LEAST upset about what Natalie said. In an interview, he was light-hearted and said they had the RIGHT to express their opinions.

So to all those absurd feather-flappers out there who made such a BFD about her innocuous little comment, you should have stopped and listened to your hero, GWB, to get HIS take on the non-issue.

Natalie, like any American citizen, had/has as much right to a personal opinion as the next. That she said what she said in another country is a moot point.

The entire flap was orchestrated by rednecks who understand little to nothing about our political system, our individual rights, and what the war in Iraq is "really" all about (oil and the NWO). And it is those redneck types who react in knee-jerk fashion by slinging mud needlessly and bulldozing CDs. It truly speaks to the lack of character and utterly misguided mentalities of those who are so uninformed.

More amazing though is the fact that the Chicks were raked over the coals for that simple remark, but when that hot-air balloon Rush Limbaugh said he hopes the president FAILS, no one jumped up and boycotted his radio show or went berserk over HIS very REAL lack of patriotism and respect. You may not like BHO, you may not agree with his politics, but it's pretty outrageous for a high-profile figure to say he hopes BHO fails, because if the president fails, a big part of this nation would fail and it would affect millions of citizens. So come on rednecks and other misinformed citizens, don't be such hypocrites.
Maggie

Bristol, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
May 1, 2009
 
BLAH...BLAH...BLAH

so, you are saying that the dixie twits have freedon of speech but rednecks don't??

can't have it both ways.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

ISP: Bakersfield, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
May 1, 2009
 
texnative wrote:
You know what's so hilarious about the whole debate over Natalies' trivial remark about Bush?
GW himself was the one person LEAST upset about what Natalie said. In an interview, he was light-hearted and said they had the RIGHT to express their opinions.
So to all those absurd feather-flappers out there who made such a BFD about her innocuous little comment, you should have stopped and listened to your hero, GWB, to get HIS take on the non-issue.
Natalie, like any American citizen, had/has as much right to a personal opinion as the next. That she said what she said in another country is a moot point.
The entire flap was orchestrated by rednecks who understand little to nothing about our political system, our individual rights, and what the war in Iraq is "really" all about (oil and the NWO). And it is those redneck types who react in knee-jerk fashion by slinging mud needlessly and bulldozing CDs. It truly speaks to the lack of character and utterly misguided mentalities of those who are so uninformed.
More amazing though is the fact that the Chicks were raked over the coals for that simple remark, but when that hot-air balloon Rush Limbaugh said he hopes the president FAILS, no one jumped up and boycotted his radio show or went berserk over HIS very REAL lack of patriotism and respect. You may not like BHO, you may not agree with his politics, but it's pretty outrageous for a high-profile figure to say he hopes BHO fails, because if the president fails, a big part of this nation would fail and it would affect millions of citizens. So come on rednecks and other misinformed citizens, don't be such hypocrites.
You're wrong on a couple fronts, tex.

Maines' comments in a foreign country are NOT moot.
Her comments of a sitting President during time of war, are considered "giving aid and comfort to our enemy", in this case terrorists. Al Jazeera and other Arab media, gather comments like these and put them forth over there, as widespread dissent coming even from Americans themselves = aid and comfort.

Limbaugh not only made his comments here in the USA, but stipulated it was particular Obama <<POLICIES>> he did not agree with, and therefore wanted to fail. However there were other policies which Limbaugh hoped Obama would succeed at, for the benefit of the US, the economy for example. Rush also took plenty of flack from the left and even more from the far-left over his comments. Convenient for you to omit such news.

People of all walks of life protested Maines' comments, so your use of term "Rednecks" is rather absurd.

Part of the Iraq war was indeed for oil. The US had to ensure Iraq's oil reserves were not captured, held, and used for leverage by the bad guys. Had the bad guys succeeded, it would have created chaos and instability in the region, and drove up the costs of oil.

There's more , but I'm out of room.
texnative

Arlington, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
May 1, 2009
 
Maggie wrote:
BLAH...BLAH...BLAH
so, you are saying that the dixie twits have freedon of speech but rednecks don't??
can't have it both ways.
Your cognitive abilities are simply amazing.

(Not.)
texnative

Arlington, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
May 1, 2009
 
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
You're wrong on a couple fronts, tex.
Maines' comments in a foreign country are NOT moot.
Her comments of a sitting President during time of war, are considered "giving aid and comfort to our enemy", in this case terrorists. Al Jazeera and other Arab media, gather comments like these and put them forth over there, as widespread dissent coming even from Americans themselves = aid and comfort.
Limbaugh not only made his comments here in the USA, but stipulated it was particular Obama <<POLICIES>> he did not agree with, and therefore wanted to fail. However there were other policies which Limbaugh hoped Obama would succeed at, for the benefit of the US, the economy for example. Rush also took plenty of flack from the left and even more from the far-left over his comments. Convenient for you to omit such news.
People of all walks of life protested Maines' comments, so your use of term "Rednecks" is rather absurd.
Part of the Iraq war was indeed for oil. The US had to ensure Iraq's oil reserves were not captured, held, and used for leverage by the bad guys. Had the bad guys succeeded, it would have created chaos and instability in the region, and drove up the costs of oil.
There's more , but I'm out of room.
It is all essentially moot.

There is no difference between being verbalizing one's shame of the president or saying it is hoped the president fails.

The reaction to Natalie would have been the same, no matter where it was said. Republicans are major hypocrites and not generally able to understand something as basic as common sense.

(And btw, I'm neither a Democrat nor a Republican, so my views aren't based on closed-minded bias or bigotry.)

Our foreign enemies gather everything - they are aware of everything done and said here and abroad; America is therefore, the superpower laughing stock of the universe. We are supposed to be SO powerful, SO intelligent, SO progressive, and yet everyday, American citizens entangle themselves in these stupid, petty issues involving entertainers' comments and lowly talk show hosts ... yada, yada.

Insignificant people and their insignificant bickerings and pettiness ... bleh.

As for Iraq, it's about the NWO. It's about ultimate power/control and money. Hussein is still alive and living well. Bin Laden is the NWO's buddy. 9/11 was an inside job, mere collateral damage to the NWO/US government. Americans are nothing but pawns and part of the plan involves dumbing down the general masses ... something the NWO & our own government is methodically doing each and every day through its systematic methods of poisoning and altering the minds of the American people.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

ISP: Bakersfield, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
May 1, 2009
 
texnative wrote:
<quoted text>
It is all essentially moot.
There is no difference between being verbalizing one's shame of the president or saying it is hoped the president fails.
The reaction to Natalie would have been the same, no matter where it was said. Republicans are major hypocrites and not generally able to understand something as basic as common sense.
(And btw, I'm neither a Democrat nor a Republican, so my views aren't based on closed-minded bias or bigotry.)
Our foreign enemies gather everything - they are aware of everything done and said here and abroad; America is therefore, the superpower laughing stock of the universe. We are supposed to be SO powerful, SO intelligent, SO progressive, and yet everyday, American citizens entangle themselves in these stupid, petty issues involving entertainers' comments and lowly talk show hosts ... yada, yada.
Insignificant people and their insignificant bickerings and pettiness ... bleh.
As for Iraq, it's about the NWO. It's about ultimate power/control and money. Hussein is still alive and living well. Bin Laden is the NWO's buddy. 9/11 was an inside job, mere collateral damage to the NWO/US government. Americans are nothing but pawns and part of the plan involves dumbing down the general masses ... something the NWO & our own government is methodically doing each and every day through its systematic methods of poisoning and altering the minds of the American people.
I'm an Independent and believe you have a right to your opinion no matter how off-the-chart ridiculous it is.

You've expressed yours, I've responded with mine. Discourse ended.
texnative

Arlington, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
May 1, 2009
 
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm an Independent and believe you have a right to your opinion no matter how off-the-chart ridiculous it is.
You've expressed yours, I've responded with mine. Discourse ended.
That is merely a less-than-gracious way of slipping out of a debate for which one simply has no substantial rebuttal or contributions.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

ISP: Bakersfield, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
May 1, 2009
 
texnative wrote:
<quoted text>
That is merely a less-than-gracious way of slipping out of a debate for which one simply has no substantial rebuttal or contributions.
Ha ha ha, there IS no debate with delusional people like you tex. You're waaaaaaay beyond reasonable logic.

But you think whatever ya want, "genius"!
texnative

Arlington, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
May 1, 2009
 
Very articulate . . . and predictable.
Maggie

Bristol, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
May 2, 2009
 
texnative wrote:
<quoted text>
Your cognitive abilities are simply amazing.
(Not.)
yeah? glad you like it.

“Custer @ LBH - Ooops”

Since: Nov 07

Bakersfield, CA

ISP: Bakersfield, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
May 5, 2009
 
texnative wrote:
Very articulate ... and predictable.
Ooooooooooo...you're a fortune teller too? Is there no end to yer talents, tex?
Maggie

Bristol, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
May 6, 2009
 
bad bob wrote:
<quoted text>
Ooooooooooo...you're a fortune teller too? Is there no end to yer talents, tex?
LOL!
Larry

Columbia, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
May 9, 2009
 
tex....you aren't biased or bigoted? Can't prove it by me.
Nathan

Salisbury, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Jun 29, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Why are people still pissed off about this? The American people have spoken. Natalie was right! Bush was a disgrace. His policies not only put in the mess we're in today, he almost single-handedly killed the Republican Party...none of them wanted anything to do with him during the election. Anybody who thinks otherwise is in serious denial!!
Bigfoot

Baton Rouge, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Jun 30, 2009
 
Where are they now ? It must have been a majority vote to ban their CD's and concerts. The minority who agree with what she said, well, are the minority that don't understand. Support our troops.
Nathan

Salisbury, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Jun 30, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Where are they now? Mr. ah..Bigfoot, I would say they are at home with their families enjoying the life style that the money from selling better than 10,000,000 copies of their latest CD Taking The Long Way affords them...And what may I ask does this have to do with supporting our troops? The Dixie Chicks have always, very vocally, supported our troops. You just weren't listening.
Maggie

Bristol, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Jun 30, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Nathan wrote:
Where are they now? Mr. ah..Bigfoot, I would say they are at home with their families enjoying the life style that the money from selling better than 10,000,000 copies of their latest CD Taking The Long Way affords them...And what may I ask does this have to do with supporting our troops? The Dixie Chicks have always, very vocally, supported our troops. You just weren't listening.
well they're sure not resting up from all those sold out concerts!!
Bigfoot

Baton Rouge, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Jun 30, 2009
 
Nathan wrote:
Where are they now? Mr. ah..Bigfoot, I would say they are at home with their families enjoying the life style that the money from selling better than 10,000,000 copies of their latest CD Taking The Long Way affords them...And what may I ask does this have to do with supporting our troops? The Dixie Chicks have always, very vocally, supported our troops. You just weren't listening.
I knew you wouldn't understand. That's why clueless people follow them.
Nathan

Salisbury, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Jun 30, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Boy are you people haters! I found this website just googling Dixie Chicks to see when the next CD is coming out. I'll bet you guys have been hanging out here for years now just waiting to bitch at the people who might like and appreciate the Dixie Chicks and their music. You need to move on. It's been years now and most of the country now sides with Natalie. It's time to get out of the sand box and let the other kids play in peace... You big bullies!!!
Maggie

Bristol, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Jul 1, 2009
 

Judged:

1

Nathan wrote:
Boy are you people haters! I found this website just googling Dixie Chicks to see when the next CD is coming out. I'll bet you guys have been hanging out here for years now just waiting to bitch at the people who might like and appreciate the Dixie Chicks and their music. You need to move on. It's been years now and most of the country now sides with Natalie. It's time to get out of the sand box and let the other kids play in peace... You big bullies!!!
it's not about taking sides or if you agree with her.
it's the total disrespect she displayed in another country.
if you want to trash the president then you better stand on american soil and do it or you just might tick some people off.
Tell me when this thread is updated!
(registration is not required)
Showing posts 1 - 20 of52
< prev page
|
Go to last post| Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent The Dixie Chicks Discussions

Search the The Dixie Chicks Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Polanda s Natalie Maines (May '09) Dec 19 Barry from A... 2
Judge dismisses defamation suit against Dixie C... Dec 8 WhiteSheetsA... 10
How do I contact the Dixie Chicks? (Dec '06) Nov 30 bad bob 554
Madonna 'is richest woman singer' (Feb '08) Nov '09 Megal Jameson 15
Oh, Great: Nashville Songwriters Name Redneck D... Sep '09 Carley Mickle 1
Underwood beats out the boys (Apr '09) Jul '09 InColdBlood 18
Divorce leads to great songs by Charlie Robison Jul '09 build it 1

Be the talk of the town

Get your topix hats, t-shirts & more!

Shop our store now!

Daily Horoscope for December 26

Cancer

Mercury turning retro is offering you the chance to make sweeping and long-lasting changes to your life, and to clear the ground for some fertile growth in 2010. Lawyers and legal matters, debates, contract negotiations, partnership or other alliances, and joint ventures of any kind need attention. As a Cancerian you don't like endings, but you must now bring an end to any situation or relationship that is holding you back or has passed its sell-by date. Look forward, not back, if you want a glittering future.

Get your Horoscope »