Rosie Continues To Push 911 Conspiracy...Geeze!

Rosie needs to stop talking and commenting on topics that are in need of scientific back up. All she wants to do is argue about WTC Bldg. 7 and how it came to crash to the ground. She is so condescending and righteous when talking to Elisabeth about this subject, as if she is the voice of authority on ANYTHING governmental.

Elisabeth made a good point on today's show and suggested that Rosie invite two EXPERTS, one from Popular Mechanics and then one of Rosie's choice who would support her theory. This way the EXPERTS could explain better, with accuracy, what either took place or might have taken place on that dreaded day.

For Rosie O'Donnell to play high and mighty when it comes to something so sensitive and specialized as this subject, is like her trying to talk as though she understands brain surgery...please!

Rosie, bring in the EXPERTS and stop posturing as though you are one yourself.

I noticed that on this morning's show, Rosie "insinuated" that Rudy Giuliani played a part in the conspiracy. How whacked out can one person be?

on view today wrote:

Rosie needs to stop talking and commenting on topics that are in need of scientific back up. All she wants to do is argue about WTC Bldg. 7 and how it came to crash to the ground. She is so condescending and righteous when talking to Elisabeth about this subject, as if she is the voice of authority on ANYTHING governmental.
Elisabeth made a good point on today's show and suggested that Rosie invite two EXPERTS, one from Popular Mechanics and then one of Rosie's choice who would support her theory. This way the EXPERTS could explain better, with accuracy, what either took place or might have taken place on that dreaded day.
For Rosie O'Donnell to play high and mighty when it comes to something so sensitive and specialized as this subject, is like her trying to talk as though she understands brain surgery...please!
Rosie, bring in the EXPERTS and stop posturing as though you are one yourself.

Long Live Elizabeth! It's about time someone called Rosie on it

Maybe they should just invite members of the FDNY who where there that day so they can explain how badly damaged the building was. Why do you think they pulled out from the building two hours before it collapsed !!!
Rosie is nothing more then a publicity whore, who cares what this dim witted, college drop out thinks !!!!!!

on view today wrote:

Rosie needs to stop talking and commenting on topics that are in need of scientific back up. All she wants to do is argue about WTC Bldg. 7 and how it came to crash to the ground. She is so condescending and righteous when talking to Elisabeth about this subject, as if she is the voice of authority on ANYTHING governmental.
Elisabeth made a good point on today's show and suggested that Rosie invite two EXPERTS, one from Popular Mechanics and then one of Rosie's choice who would support her theory. This way the EXPERTS could explain better, with accuracy, what either took place or might have taken place on that dreaded day.
For Rosie O'Donnell to play high and mighty when it comes to something so sensitive and specialized as this subject, is like her trying to talk as though she understands brain surgery...please!
Rosie, bring in the EXPERTS and stop posturing as though you are one yourself.

Read the 911 commision report.That is a conspiracy theory!

Look at the facts and evidence of what she is bringing up what do you have to rebut?Popular Machanics?Open your eyes and your mind to the truth and not spin.There are very credible sources that have brought enough evidence to light that would easily convict any person in this once great counrty of treason and high crimes.

Why hasn't that happened?
Probably because of closed minded peolpe like yourselves letting this country die while you believe we where attacked by Arabs.The police policing the police?What a joke!There are good people inside the beast that have come out with very strong evidence 911 was an inside job.TRUE PATRIOTS with more balls than you will ever have!Willing to DIE to get the truth out.
Elizabeth Nobrainhasselbeck is only spouting out what neo-cons have been regurgitating ad nauseum on the main stream media.I don't blame people for calling her a neo-con.She is a joke.More concerned with fashion not politics.

"Elisabeth made a good point on today's show and suggested that Rosie invite two EXPERTS, one from Popular Mechanics and then one of Rosie's choice who would support her theory."

Rosie has already tried to do this without Nobrainhasselbeck suggesting it.The view will not have two or more experts to debate the subject on one airing.Each expert will probably appear on seperate shows.Why?Because the so called conspiracy nuts have FACTS not RHETORIC to back up thier claims.

"Rosie needs to stop talking and commenting on topics that are in need of scientific back up."

Have you ever heard of Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones?
A credible individual to come forward and assert that the official story of 9/11 differs wildly from the observable facts.Thermate doesn't occur naturally at buildings that supposibly fell by fire.Thermate found in dust and steel samples from WTC.

Have you ever heard of Kevin Ryan?

An executive at Underwriters Laboratories (UL), the company that certified the steel used in the construction of the World Trade Center, has questioned the common theory that fuel fires caused the Twin Towers to collapse.

In a letter dated Thursday (11/11, complete text below), UL executive Kevin Ryan called on Frank Gayle, director of the government team that has spent two years studying how the trade center was built and why it fell, to "do what you can to quickly eliminate the confusion regarding the ability of jet fuel fires to soften or melt structural steel."

Kevin Ryan is Site Manager at Environmental Health Laboratories (EHL) in South Bend, Indiana. This is a division of UL, the product-compliance and testing giant. Because UL certified the WTC steel for its ability to withstand fires, the steel's performance on September 11 is obviously of concern to the company. While Ryan's letter does not constitute an official statement from Underwriters Laboratories, it suggests incipient disagreements between UL and NIST about the true cause of the WTC collapses.

If you think fire brought those buildings down you better not turn your stove on or it might fall to the ground at free fall speed.
Open your mind!

RADEKT wrote:

Rosie is nothing more then a publicity whore, who cares what this dim witted, college drop out thinks !!!!!!
<quoted text>

Answer: Rositards

E Nobrainhasselbeck wrote:

Have you ever heard of Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E. Jones?
A credible individual to come forward and assert that the official story of 9/11 differs wildly from the observable facts.Thermate doesn't occur naturally at buildings that supposibly fell by fire.Thermate found in dust and steel samples from WTC.
Have you ever heard of Kevin Ryan?
An executive at Underwriters Laboratories (UL), the company that certified the steel used in the construction of the World Trade Center, has questioned the common theory that fuel fires caused the Twin Towers to collapse.
In a letter dated Thursday (11/11, complete text below), UL executive Kevin Ryan called on Frank Gayle, director of the government team that has spent two years studying how the trade center was built and why it fell, to "do what you can to quickly eliminate the confusion regarding the ability of jet fuel fires to soften or melt structural steel."
Kevin Ryan is Site Manager at Environmental Health Laboratories (EHL) in South Bend, Indiana. This is a division of UL, the product-compliance and testing giant. Because UL certified the WTC steel for its ability to withstand fires, the steel's performance on September 11 is obviously of concern to the company. While Ryan's letter does not constitute an official statement from Underwriters Laboratories, it suggests incipient disagreements between UL and NIST about the true cause of the WTC collapses.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Good joke both were fired for being less than factual. Check your facts neither one works at the places you claim any more. Glad you did your research for "The Truth" and your political agenda.

Don't turn your stove on!
DANGER!!!!
DANGER!!!!
DANGER!!!!
It will collapse!

A child can figure out that fire did not bring those buildings down.
People get fired for poltic views all the time.
That doesn't discredit their intellect or expertise in the field they study.
I've met young children that are more aware of facts surrounding 911 than you.
DONT TURN YOUR STOVE ON!!
DANGER!!!
DANGER!!!

"Rosie is nothing more then a publicity whore, who cares what this dim witted, college drop out thinks !!!!!!"

Let's debate facts not call names.
Oooh thats right you have no facts that support the 911 commision Report conspiracy theory!
Name 1 fact that supports that police policing the police rhetoric.
Just 1.
Allow rebut.No name calling unless you have no facts.Lets see who makes more sense.

E Nobrainhasselbeck wrote:

Don't turn your stove on!
DANGER!!!!
DANGER!!!!
DANGER!!!!
It will collapse!
A child can figure out that fire did not bring those buildings down.
People get fired for poltic views all the time.
That doesn't discredit their intellect or expertise in the field they study.
I've met young children that are more aware of facts surrounding 911 than you.
DONT TURN YOUR STOVE ON!!
DANGER!!!
DANGER!!!

And every one in the government is in on it too right? MIT did the simulations after the commission report came out their in on it too right? Greenly is a canadian who is critical of the sloppy job of the commissions investigation but has done the physics I suppose he's lying too. As is everyone that doesn't fit your conspiracy

E Nobrainhasselbeck wrote:

People get fired for poltic views all the time.
That doesn't discredit their intellect or expertise in the field they study.
I've met young children that are more aware of facts surrounding 911 than you.

Better check your facts again because neither one is commenting inside of their field of expertise.

Compartmentalization comes to mind.Not everyone has to be involved.
The fact is drills of running planes into the towers where being conducted at the same exact time the real event happened.
Just coincidence right?
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF THAT?
Operation Northwoods is a farse too right?
Declassified FACT that they have planned similar acts of treason.

E Nobrainhasselbeck wrote:

"Rosie is nothing more then a publicity whore, who cares what this dim witted, college drop out thinks !!!!!!"
Let's debate facts not call names.
Oooh thats right you have no facts that support the 911 commision Report conspiracy theory!
Name 1 fact that supports that police policing the police rhetoric.
Just 1.
Allow rebut.No name calling unless you have no facts.Lets see who makes more sense.

Here are the facts http://www.debunking911.com/firsttime.htm

Are you kidding?
The debunkers you have sited have been debunked.
Stick to one point at a time.
Or better yet.
Let the dead bury the dead.
Have fun with your North Amercican Union.
Love your RFID chip.
Report to your nearist FEMA camp and turn in your guns.
Illegal immigrants will soon drive your wage down to third world country status and I'm sure you'll find a rational to accept it.
Waste of time here.
Oh ya.
Don't turn on your stove.
IT WILL COLLAPSE AT FREE FALL SPEED!!!

E Nobrainhasselbeck wrote:

Compartmentalization comes to mind.Not everyone has to be involved.
The fact is drills of running planes into the towers where being conducted at the same exact time the real event happened.
Just coincidence right?
WHAT ARE THE CHANCES OF THAT?
Operation Northwoods is a farse too right?
Declassified FACT that they have planned similar acts of treason.

Your first statement is false there were war games being conducted that had planned on for months (happens every year) and was NOT a plane into tower scenario, you are confusing a NATO scenario where terrorists hijack a plane and hit the Eiffel tower and that was not being run on 9/11.
Operation Northwoods was a "what if" scenario never signed off by the Chief Operations Officer or Kennedy nor was it ever implemented.

E Nobrainhasselbeck wrote:

Are you kidding?
The debunkers you have sited have been debunked.
Stick to one point at a time.
Or better yet.
Let the dead bury the dead.
Have fun with your North Amercican Union.
Love your RFID chip.
Report to your nearist FEMA camp and turn in your guns.
Illegal immigrants will soon drive your wage down to third world country status and I'm sure you'll find a rational to accept it.
Waste of time here.
Oh ya.
Don't turn on your stove.
IT WILL COLLAPSE AT FREE FALL SPEED!!!

Funny watching the videos again the debris falls faster than the buildings, obviously the collapse can't be at free fall speed now can it?

E Nobrainhasselbeck wrote:

Are you kidding?
The debunkers you have sited have been debunked.

Not hardly and is one of many sites that you people fail to read because it doesn't fit the agenda you have.

RADEKT wrote:

Maybe they should just invite members of the FDNY who where there that day so they can explain how badly damaged the building was. Why do you think they pulled out from the building two hours before it collapsed !!!
Rosie is nothing more then a publicity whore, who cares what this dim witted, college drop out thinks !!!!!!
<quoted text>

Maybe they should interview the firefighters, emts, police, news reporters, WTC workers all reporting explosions, at street level, in the sub basement, and throughout the towers, like the firefighters that said explosions pushed them up the stairs?

your really ignorant

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/may2007/1505...
Debunk the science AssBoyle, Radickhead, and logically stupid...

RADEKT wrote:

Maybe they should just invite members of the FDNY who where there that day so they can explain how badly damaged the building was. Why do you think they pulled out from the building two hours before it collapsed !!!
Rosie is nothing more then a publicity whore, who cares what this dim witted, college drop out thinks !!!!!!
<quoted text>

Who cares what this dim witted, college drop out thinks? well well well, you have posted many many many posts about what Rosie is saying, so I would say, that yeah you do care, otherwise you wouldnt be here posting?

Moron...