DeGeneres, de Rossi Plan To Marry

Judged:

2

2

1

fed up with the mess wrote:

<quoted text>I am with you Mark M. Next you will be able to marry your dog, cat or bird. This is the direction this country is headed.

Judged:

2

2

2

fed up with the mess wrote:

<quoted text>CA is a sesspool of wickedness and they are doing everything possible to disobey GODS order. When the big quake comes they need not ask why.

Judged:

2

2

Ben Dayho wrote:

I wonder if Ellen might be inept at being a lesbian. Didn't her old girlfriend Ann whatever switch back to men?

Ripariandweller wrote:

<quoted text>
Ellen was only guilty of getting involved with a woman who didn't know what she wanted. I have a theory that once they've been with a man, they might experiment with other women, but they eventually go back to a man. If I recall correctly, the same thing happened to Melissa Etheridge and Julie Sipher (spelling?). Julie was Lou Diamond Phillips ex, left him for Melissa, left her for a man.
If they want to marry and go through the same trials and tribulations as us heteros do, let them. Until then, it will always be a case of "the grass is always greener."

Judged:

1

Mark JM wrote:

<quoted text>
You're right, I'm suprised that hasn't happened already either. But I'm glad this ruling is being appealed and I'm more than positive it'll be shot down in the US Supreme Court.

Ben Dayho wrote:

I wonder if Ellen might be inept at being a lesbian. Didn't her old girlfriend Ann whatever switch back to men?

Judged:

2

1

1

fed up with the mess wrote:

<quoted text>CA is a sesspool of wickedness and they are doing everything possible to disobey GODS order. When the big quake comes they need not ask why.

Judged:

2

1

1

Opinion Only wrote:

It's California! Who the heck cares! But then, gay marriage is weird!!!
Gay marriage doesnt last! As time goes by, they are so tired of it, they they will file divorce and find a man......

Judged:

2

1

Mark JM wrote:

It is a threat to traditional marriage. Look, I can understand the homos wanting civil unions (for the tax benefits, civil rights, etc.), but to call it "Marriage", that is the problem I have with all this.
Again, I don't care what two men or two women do to each other in their own lives, but Marriage should be that of a Union between One Man and One Woman.
Civil Unions on the other hand, I see no problem.
I'm looking at this from a religious perspective, not a political one.

Judged:

1

1

1

Ozzie wrote:

I'm a supporter of gay rights. And not a closet supporter either. From the time I was a kid, I have never been able to understand attacks upon the gay community. There are so many qualities that make up a human being... by the time I get through with all the things that I really admire about people, what they do with their private parts is probably so low on the list that it is irrelevant.”
~ Paul Newman

Pasahoma wrote:

<quoted text>
Did Paul Newman really say that? I knew he was cool, but to have someone from his generation be so open-minded...uber-cool.