Chavez says election rival and Romney want to subjugate Venezuela

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>By a 62% to 30% margin, voters believe policies that encourage economic growth are more important than policies to ensure economic fairness.
The Rasmussen
Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Sunday shows Mitt Romney attracting 46% of the vote, while President Obama earns support from 44%. Five percent (5%) prefer some other candidate, and four percent (4%) more are undecided. 69% of the undecided have a negative opinion of President Obama.
Voters strongly believe that it’s important for the government to create an environment that encourages economic growth and ensures economic fairness, but growth is seen as the higher priority. Most believe Romney champions growth, while Obama is more focused on fairness.
Half (49%) believe government anti-poverty programs actually increase the level of poverty in this country. Most think there are too many people on welfare who should not be getting it and believe overwhelmingly that those who do receive welfare benefits should be required to work.

Dane Thorsen wrote:

I am surprised. I never thought Hugo Chavez would stoop so low as to link himself with Obama.

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>As leader of the (cough) Democratic Party, couldn't Obama just command the liberals that owe billions in back taxes to pay up and save the pay of 4000 IRS gestapo agents.

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>Allowing the wealthy to run roughshod over the rest of us tends to leave the rest of us behind when it comes to creation of jobs that allow us to spend enough on products made by the companies that have the potential to create jobs. Economic facts are also not subject to opinion polls. Historically, Republican administrations have tended to lag behind the Democrats in job creation over the last 50 years. I am not questioning that too many able bodied people who are able to work receive it, but economic fairness does not begin and end with welfare issues, and don't forget that subsidies are also given to businesses.

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>What the less affluent democrats avoid in taxes is a drop in the bucket compared to what the wealthy Republicans owe the government.

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>Obama does not intend to nationalize the petroleum industry like Chavez has and is content to allow private enterprise exist. Maybe it escaped your notice, but Obamacare would still be administered by private companies under federal regulations and not directly by the government. Obama has definite socialist leanings, but he is far from being as socialistic as Chavez. Obama realizes that free enterprise is still more efficient and productive than government ownership of all commerce. In spite of my post, I do not plan to vote for Obama or Romney either as both of them are jokers.

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>WHAT.......are you smoking. Reagan gave us years of positive jobs, Bush 41 months of steady jobs growth.....Obama, Carter and Clinton did little, and Obama has actually set a record in negative net job growth proving once again that socialist/marxist tax and spend doesn't work.

Unbelievable wrote:

<quoted text>
‘You Americans are so gullible. No, you won’t accept communism outright. But we’ll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you finally wake up and find you already have communism. We won’t have to fight you; we’ll so weaken your economy until you fall like overripe fruit into our hands.’”
-Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev, 1959

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>Obama was asked if he intended to pay more than what the law called for........he said no.....even though he keeps asking other to pay more. The Kennedy's, Kerry, Pelosi, Feinstein, Reid, Shumer, Obama, Gates, Buffet and most liberal members of congress are all one percenters......you charge of rich republicans is just a hypocritical typical liberal smoke screen of liberals never do what they ask others to do.

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>Hwe also created more national debt than the thirty nine previous presidents combined. He and GHW Bush between them quadrupled the national debt. Reagan also experienced a significant loss of jobs and unprecedented level of business failure in his early years as president and Bush lost his bid for reelection because of higher unemployment rates. You mentioned 41 months of job growth in the twelve years of Reagan and Bush. What happened to the other 103 months? When Reagan took office, the unemplyment rate was starting to decline and he turned a fledgling recovery into double dip recession. Obama took over while the economy was in a state of freefall compliments of his predecessor.

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>well maybe if you re-read the post you would see that Bush gave us 41 months of positive jobs growth and Reagan gave us 24 years of prosperity that loons say didn't work.

]It's Official: 5 Straight Years of $1 Trillion Deficits!
----------
USATODAYGALLUP POLL: Romney preferred over Obama to handle economy...

Campaigns ease back into fighting mode... duh......our lies aint' working boss.......duh whats do's we do next, we's axing yous be da kingfish.

inbred Genius wrote:

Who said....
Well Joe, we're gonna spread the wealth around
I think at some point, youve made enough money.
Well, you can open a coalmine, but we're gonna bankrupt it.
If you own a business, you didn't build that, somebody else made that happen.
And people laugh at Joe Biden's gaffes.
How can the pres of the US say this kind of stuff and not be considered a socialist?

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>well maybe if you re-read the post you would see that Bush gave us 41 months of positive jobs growth and Reagan gave us 24 years of prosperity that loons say didn't work.
]It's Official: 5 Straight Years of $1 Trillion Deficits!
----------
USATODAYGALLUP POLL: Romney preferred over Obama to handle economy...
Campaigns ease back into fighting mode... duh......our lies aint' working boss.......duh whats do's we do next, we's axing yous be da kingfish.

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>The deficits were projected to exceed one trillion dollars even before Obama took office compliments of Dumbya. Reagan himself created more national debt in 8 years than ALL the presidents before him. Since Reagan's election in 1980, we have had 20 years of GOP cutting taxes without the promised corresponding revenue increases and budget restraints. That is why we are in the mess we are in now. Opinion polls are just that. They are just an opinion and hardly established facts. If

flbadcatowner wrote:

<quoted text>The deficits were projected to exceed one trillion dollars even before Obama took office compliments of Dumbya. Reagan himself created more national debt in 8 years than ALL the presidents before him. Since Reagan's election in 1980, we have had 20 years of GOP cutting taxes without the promised corresponding revenue increases and budget restraints. That is why we are in the mess we are in now. Opinion polls are just that. They are just an opinion and hardly established facts. If

Le Jimbo wrote: