|
budd
Thailand
|
Le Jimbo wrote: <quoted text>Michelle Obama, as we reported on July 7, is not served by twenty-two attendants who stand by to cater to her every whim. She is served by twenty-six attendants, including a hair dresser and make-up artist. Deilia A.(Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady) Readers throughout the country expressed outrage that Mrs. Obama would hire an unprecedented number of staffers in the midst of the Great Recession. Lelyveld said that Michelle Obama’s staff was actually no different than that of her predecessor, Laura Bush. "[W]e have exactly the same staff number as Mrs. Bush and our office organization reflects a similar staffing model, so insinuations otherwise are wrong," she said. Lelyveld said that the White House’s "personnel records indicate" that there were 24 staffers for Laura Bush at some point. We were able to verify at least 18 staffers for Laura Bush, as of June 30, 2008, via the 2008 White House staff list published in The Washington Post’s White House Watch column. Sixteen people were specifically referred to as a "first lady" staffer, and Amy Zantzinger and Dorothy Thornton served as White House social secretary and deputy social secretary, respectively. It’s possible that someone with the title of "staff assistant" was assigned to the Office of First Lady as well, as is the case with Michelle Obama’s staff. The combined annual salaries for the 22 staffers we can specifically identify as working for Michelle Obama come to $1.6 million. For the 18 we could identify as working for Laura Bush in 2008, the total is $1.4 million. Dr. Myra Gutin, a professor of communications at Rider University and a first ladies historian, says that the first lady’s role has certainly "grown and evolved" since the 1960s, but generally speaking, the first lady’s "staff numbers about 14-16." Gutin told us she recalled "some first ladies have had staffs of more than that." –D’Angelo Gore http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/michelle-oba...
|
|
“Lying for the Lord”
Since: May 12
Heartland USA
|
Please wait...
Despite reporting income of $21.7 million, the couple paid only $20,603 in taxable wages for household help in 2010. This figure was divided among four women: Rosania Costa ($4,808), Kelli Harrison ($8,667), Susan Moore ($2,238) and Valerie Cravens Anae ($4,890). According to a number of Boston-based domestic staffing agencies, the salary range for a housekeeper is between $20 and $30 an hour, which adds up to an annual salary of $40,000 to $50,000 based on forty-hour weeks and two weeks of paid vacation a year.
|
|
Eleanor
Round Lake, IL
|
The Lying Mormon wrote: Despite reporting income of $21.7 million, the couple paid only $20,603 in taxable wages for household help in 2010. This figure was divided among four women: Rosania Costa ($4,808), Kelli Harrison ($8,667), Susan Moore ($2,238) and Valerie Cravens Anae ($4,890). According to a number of Boston-based domestic staffing agencies, the salary range for a housekeeper is between $20 and $30 an hour, which adds up to an annual salary of $40,000 to $50,000 based on forty-hour weeks and two weeks of paid vacation a year. Did it say WHERE they worked?? Washington, DC OR Chicago. They probably helped 'maintain' his Chicago household. <maybe> The Obama's had PLENTY of 'help' working for them in Washington, DC on the taxpayers dime.
|
|
poe try
Greeley, CO
|
Obama is sure desperate! He has NO record of doing ANYTHING in his entire life. "Community organizer" is just code for far-left agitator, nothing more. He's a huge bag of empty nothing, as well as being immature and a hopeless egoist.
|
Since: Dec 11
Fort Worth, TX
|
Please wait...
frank wrote: <quoted text> Your bro Glenn Beck is back to restore insanity for all you half-retarded rightwingnuz launching his Web TV network called GBTV Seriously?? I hadn't heard! Just exactly what we need. Another bigotted, drug-addled misogynist spewing hatred to make a buck off the uneducated and gullible.
|
|
Spocko
Oakland, CA
|
Le Jimbo wrote: <quoted text>Give it up son. You don't have the mental capacity to deal with adults. 78% of the buyouts of Bain Capital grew, added jobs and became successes, instead of losers. Of course that little tidbit was of companies in many states, not just Massachusetts that was controlled by a liberal congress.........hense jobs growth. Okay, I’m willing to show some patience here and try to gently coax you along as you clearly are not the brightest bulb in the chandelier. You see, we don’t really have a problem with business in general or the private equity business in particular, we are only interested in Romney’s own record — the very record Romney is running on, which is his career at Bain. Romney has steadily misrepresented that history in his effort to position himself as a Mr. Fix-it for the economy and a brilliant exemplar of job creation in the private sector. Problem is, job creation was not, never has been, Romney’s mission at Bain his sole and only mission was to maximize the investors profits whether it created jobs or eliminated jobs or eliminated a company altogether, that never even entered his mind, such trivialities are of no concern with corporate raiders or corporate vultures! Is it any wonder that Romney is a multi millionaire and Joe Blow who lost his job is on food stamps – way to go Mitt!
|
Since: Jan 10
Las Vegas, NV
|
Please wait...
Eric Gustafson wrote: President Obama delivered the Nation from the bowels of the George Bush/Republican 2008 Depression in a fraction of the time it took to deliver from the first Depression in 1929. This President accomplished those feats with less than $300 Billion and the Republicans lined up in lock step against his activities to save the nation. If anything President after the Killing of Bin Laden, and the Leader of Lybia responsible for the deaths of 260 Americans and the stabilizing of America's Economy and Financial system is truly and American Hero. <quoted text> What happens when the next GWB comes along? You libs ready?
|
Since: Jan 10
Las Vegas, NV
|
Please wait...
In the news the month: - West Virgina democrat primary, a Texas prison inmate gets 42.3%, obama gets %57.7% - In Kentucky "uncommitted " gets 42.1%, obama gets 57.9% - Arkansas, a lawyer named John Wolfe takes 41% of the vote, obama 59% obama can't do better then 60% in his own party, running unopposed?? That's insane. You libs are in deep shit trouble.
|
|
|
|
Since: May 08
Deltona Fla
|
Please wait...
Ron Johnston wrote: <quoted text> Hillary Rosen..... So how was Romney's family attacked?
|
|
“KONA, baby!”
Since: Jul 08
Jacksonville, FL
|
Please wait...
Contributions wrote: <quoted text> Are you retarded? The real question is, has there been a Romney ad that WASN'T an attack ad? So, in other words, you can't cite one attack ad from the Romney campaign. I didn't think so.
|
|
Eric Gustafson
Newport News, VA
|
Maybe you can't read very well. "1) a "low and moderate" income goal, targeting borrowers earning no more than an area's median income; 2) an "underserved area" goal, targeting people in neighborhoods whose residents earned 90-95% of an area's median income; and 3) a "special affordable" goal, focused on people earning no more than 60% of an area's median, or living in exceptionally poor neighborhoods." So based on your reading comprehension level the above passage has been interpreted by you to mean that people with Bad Credit are to be given loans by Banks, and therefore servicing these group collapsed the economy?........ ROFLMAO, you're wrong because you can't read, or understand that simple paragraph and have no understanding of how to calculate the figures involved in the passage. I'm going to break some of this down for you based solely on what that passage you posed contains. You make the correlation that "targeting borrowers earning no more than an area's median income;" or, low income borrowers automatically means bad credit? You do understand that $34,000 Dollar a year is Low Income, right? The Median Income in America is $28,000 Or, residents earning 90% to 95% of an area's median income, say some of the shipyard workers at NG, would be approx $24,700 to %31,000. Guess what, all of those salaries are low income, welcome to America. All of those salaries qualify for Wage Subsidies at income tax time if those employees don't work overtime. GoodNewz wrote: <quoted text> fannie and freddie backed a high percentage of the risky loans, and made a lot of money doing so . the pressure was absolutely political. all of us nice politicians are gonna make sure you people who are not credit worthy can get a house anyway. my experience is that a "troll" is one who hurls insults when he has weak facts... "In 1992 Congress changed the rules of the game. It charged Fannie and Freddie with boosting homeownership among poor and minority families. It did this by adopting a series of complex, overlapping housing "affordability" goals. These came in three varieties: 1) a "low and moderate" income goal, targeting borrowers earning no more than an area's median income; 2) an "underserved area" goal, targeting people in neighborhoods whose residents earned 90-95% of an area's median income; and 3) a "special affordable" goal, focused on people earning no more than 60% of an area's median, or living in exceptionally poor neighborhoods. Congress justified these goals by contending the GSEs should advance policy objectives because the federal government had conferred so many advantages upon them not available to their competitors. The legislation delegated to the Department of Housing and Urban Development the power to increase Fannie and Freddie's affordability goals, which it did. In 1993, the "low and moderate income goal" was 30% of the GSEs mortgages. By 2008, it was 56%. From 1993 to 2008, the "underserved area" goal went from 30% to 39%. To Morgenson and Rosner, the housing affordability goals led "more than any other single act...to the disastrous home lending practices of the 2000s." To the Stern School economists, the combination of ambitious affordability goals and the GSEs' lax capital requirements transformed Fannie and Freddie collectively into "the largest hedge fund on the planet." Each backed hundreds of billions of dollars of ever-riskier home loans, which generated high profits in good times but exposed them to enormous losses, should the economy weaken. Losses then might swamp the GSEs' thin capital base."
|
|
Eric Gustafson
Newport News, VA
|
The Passage simply provides insurance that workers earning less than $34,000 have access to mortgage services to buy homes that they can afford on their small salaries. By no means were banks directed to provide loans to people who were unqualified or could not repay the loans...... In the South for instance wages are depressed and the average income does not exceed $25,000, more than a half of the working population doesn't make more than $25,000 in most all Red Conservative States in America. You are just having problem understanding what you read because by no means does the words in the post you presented validate your theory...... "politicians are gonna make sure you people who are not credit worthy can get a house." ....... "1) a "low and moderate" income goal, targeting borrowers earning no more than an area's median income; 2) an "underserved area" goal, targeting people in neighborhoods whose residents earned 90-95% of an area's median income; and 3) a "special affordable" goal, focused on people earning no more than 60% of an area's median, or living in exceptionally poor neighborhoods."
|
|
Eric Gustafson
Newport News, VA
|
Here in Vegas wrote: <quoted text> What happens when the next GWB comes along? You libs ready? Seems you don't recognize the Candidate you support, Romney is the Next GWB.......ROFLMAO, he's no ideas tor move the County forward his campaign is centered on hating Obama and reemerging the failed Bush spending and tax cutting policies to gut the Federal Government. Romney is in it for him and his profiting. Dismantle, and auction off parts of the Federal Government and divide the money among a few close associates and Friends, exactly the model he followed at Bain Capital. With Republicans since 1972 the aim has always been the same, to Gut the Federal Government like a fish, and implement States Right, the disolvement of the United States of America in favor of a Confederacy of individual States. This is the focus of the Right Extremist since the inception of the Civil Rights Act and the abolishment of Jim Crow Laws in the South... Already in southern state they have found away to lock minorities our of the voting booth so the ground work is already laid out. Whether Obama gets reelected or not, for minorities in those state with new restrictions on American citizens life is going to be hell, they've found a way to negate the growing hispanic population and keep blacks out of the voting booth.
|
|
Eric Gustafson
Newport News, VA
|
Le Jimbo wrote: <quoted text>Wow, biggest lies yet. No wonder with loons like you spouting fertilizer Obama can't fill a room in a swing state. Wow 250 no shows.....what a crowd pleaser he is. Maybe you over looked the Law George Bush Signed in 2003 that lead to the 2008 Fiscal Collapse......ROFLMAO?????? S. 811 (108th): American Dream Downpayment Act 108th Congress, 2003–200 Introduced: Apr 08, 2003 Sponsor: Sen. Wayne Allard [R-CO, 1997-2009] Status: Signed by the President
|
|
Since: May 08
Deltona Fla
|
Please wait...
Pappa wrote: <quoted text> You keep referring to the 'George Bush/Republican 2008 Depression'. You do realize that Bush sought reform of Freddie and Fannie for years and Bawny Fwank and Nasty Pelousy fought like hell to prevent it, right? You also realize that the dimocrats took over congress and the purse strings in 2006, right? Now, who caused the depression again? The only reform that Bush wanted for F&F was to take it away from congressional supervision and place it under the Treasury. He wanted he them to be able to buy the worthless securities that where flooding wall street. That God that never happened. The problem with F&F at the time was they were losing big time market share to the private mortgage buyers. They went from almost an 80% market share to below a 30% market share. They could not compete with the non conforming loans that were being sold on Wall Street.
|
|
Eric Gustafson
Newport News, VA
|
Explaining the dynamics that surround the collapse after all of the years of lies on republican tv is useless. a major problem is the inability to read well enough to understand some of the passages they, themselves use to try to bolster their failed points. swampmudd wrote: <quoted text>The only reform that Bush wanted for F&F was to take it away from congressional supervision and place it under the Treasury. He wanted he them to be able to buy the worthless securities that where flooding wall street. That God that never happened. The problem with F&F at the time was they were losing big time market share to the private mortgage buyers. They went from almost an 80% market share to below a 30% market share. They could not compete with the non conforming loans that were being sold on Wall Street.
|
|
the rest of us
Saint Paul, MN
|
swampmudd wrote: <quoted text>The only reform that Bush wanted for F&F was to.......blah,fart,blah,fart.. .... Fartsack, nobody cares what you post, its all farts. For once in your life go do something productive today. The ridiculous amount of time you waste on here farting just stinks....nothing more.
|
|
“Lying for the Lord”
Since: May 12
Heartland USA
|
Please wait...
Roney's record in Massachusetts has already been fully scrutinized, and found wanting: dropping to 47th of the 50 states in job creation during his tenure.
|
|
Since: May 08
Deltona Fla
|
Please wait...
the rest of us wrote: <quoted text> Fartsack, nobody cares what you post, its all farts. For once in your life go do something productive today. The ridiculous amount of time you waste on here farting just stinks....nothing more. Appearently you care what I say because you respond to every one of my posting.
|
|
Since: Jul 07
Newport News, VA
|
Please wait...
The Lying Mormon wrote: Roney's record in Massachusetts has already been fully scrutinized, and found wanting: dropping to 47th of the 50 states in job creation during his tenure. as gov of arkansas, clinton's record was probably worse than 47th. obama's record prior to being in office has YET to be fully scrutinized, but what we have seen is WANTING. "The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure” will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records. He will not release his Harvard records, his Columbia College records, or his Occidental College records—he will not even release his Columbia College thesis. All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well. In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii."
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|