|
MJR
San Antonio, TX
|
None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world.
|
|
redrivergirl
Cedar Park, TX
|
Judged:
1
MJR wrote: None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world. So agree!
|
|
Thehood
Dover, NJ
|
MJR wrote: None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world. kate is white class and kim is white trash. Kardashian is a complete joke. Throw this human garbage in the dumpster.
|
|
“STOP THE BULLSH** DRAMA!”
Since: Aug 11
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
I think the Royal Wedding was better. I think it was kind of stupid that they talked about Kim K's wedding like she's royalty too. For one, she only got famous off of her sex tape and she was friends with Paris Hilton. But the Kardashians are getting paid for having this wedding all thanks to Momma Kris Jenner. Kris Jenner might be superficial but she knows how to make money. But most of the Kardashians are superficial. I watch the reality TV show sometimes and Kim got upset at her hubby Kris because he tossed her in the water she lost her earring in the ocean at Bora Bora. The guy was just having fun and she started to make him worry about how the rest of the vacation would be with her and the rest of the family. The marriage mostlikely won't last long anyways.
|
|
Veronica R
Miami, FL
|
For me the royal wedding was beautiful it made me happy to see Prince William getting married to Kate Middleton. The wedding went along very well the music the people that were there. You can see the love that William and Kate had in them beautiful wedding and the people who the wedding did it not do it because of the money but to see a wedding that many of want and the love between them. And people were making good comments of the wedding of the dress etc. they have been together William and Kate for 8 years
The Kardashians are people who have no live they put their lives on tv. This wedding with Kim and Kris was just fake. Kim and Kris have been together 10 months that little time. She always wanted to get married but she didn’t know what marriage life comes with. She’s only famous for dumb things. And her family don’t keep quiet no they have to talk about everything.
|
|
Veronica R
Miami, FL
|
MJR wrote: None of the Kardashian family has any kind of respect, they are all trashy women. Kim wanted a wedding like Prince William and Kate but she will never amount to the real wedding of the year which belongs to Prince William and his beautiful bride that have the respect of the world. I agree with you I dont like them at all on the tv they are always talking about them
|
|
want to move
Winter Springs, FL
|
Kim's wedding..what a joke. The whole thing was a bad azz joke. Only in America coud a family with no talent get rich and be compared to royalty. If Kim and Company are America's royalty we are in worse shape then I thought we were and that's pretty bad.
Kim was the azz she is famous for...lol
|
|
Mandi
Medina, OH
|
Can't compare them, Kate has class and comes from a family who carries themselves with respect and married a family who is actual real royalty. Kim married for a TV show, her family has filthy mouths and they might have money but they ain't got no class! Their actions make them ugly.
|
|
|
|
Justice44
Rochester, NY
|
Mandi wrote: Can't compare them, Kate has class and comes from a family who carries themselves with respect and married a family who is actual real royalty.
Kim married for a TV show, her family has filthy mouths and they might have money but they ain't got no class! Their actions make them ugly. But let's face it based on the logic of many Kim critics, Kate middleton is talentless. Why Kim critics fail to apply this same logic to Kate Middleton? It is irrelevant that you find Kate a superior role model than Kim K? We are referring to talent as defined by those who dislike or hate KIm K? Kate Middleton is famous for being in a family far more so than Kim K. The media rarely puts Robert K. as one of the reasons for Kim K. success. Secondly, Kate middleton carries herself with class in public but no one knows the Kate middleton in private. Kate Middleton according to "Kim K hater" reasoning has no business being famous, yet she is as exposed as Kim K. Frankly, I love the fact that Kate Middleton has the image of Mrs. Perfect but I wish people would stop being insincere with claiming Kim has no talent and expressing this excuse as a reason to dislike her when the real reason is that haters/critics dislike Kim's personality. That's fine but just say this.
|
|
Kingfish
Edwardsville, IL
|
Justice44 wrote: <quoted text>
But let's face it based on the logic of many Kim critics, Kate middleton is talentless. Why Kim critics fail to apply this same logic to Kate Middleton? It is irrelevant that you find Kate a superior role model than Kim K? We are referring to talent as defined by those who dislike or hate KIm K? Kate Middleton is famous for being in a family far more so than Kim K. The media rarely puts Robert K. as one of the reasons for Kim K. success.
Secondly, Kate middleton carries herself with class in public but no one knows the Kate middleton in private. Kate Middleton according to "Kim K hater" reasoning has no business being famous, yet she is as exposed as Kim K.
Frankly, I love the fact that Kate Middleton has the image of Mrs. Perfect but I wish people would stop being insincere with claiming Kim has no talent and expressing this excuse as a reason to dislike her when the real reason is that haters/critics dislike Kim's personality. That's fine but just say this. Actually, most people sincerely hate Kim for both her lack of talent and her obnoxious personality.
|
|
Myth Killer
Rochester, NY
|
Judged:
1
Kingfish wrote: <quoted text>
Actually, most people sincerely hate Kim for both her lack of talent and her obnoxious personality. I see talent and personality as two different things. Kanye is talented but has an obnoxious personality. Kate Middleton has a nice personality but has no talent when we define talent soley as acting, singing and dancing. Kate is someone who conducts herself in a classy manner. However, that does not mean she has more talent than Kim K in marketing and Kanye West in music. Personally I don not see the negative things that others see in Kim but I do see how Kanye is a tool. Thus, I think I am objective in my opinion. So if we were really trying to make a fair description, Kate Middleton would considered "talentless" although I think she is great representative and role model. Whether you have an aversion toward Kim K's personal behavior is irrelevant in the discussion of talent. The bottom line is that the same standards of considering Kim K as talentless should be applied to Kate Middleton. Who cares if Kate has a degree and is perceived as a better role model? That is not the defintion of talent which people are referring to when they describe to Kim K.
|
|
Myth Killer
Rochester, NY
|
This is what annoys me. We judge EVERY entrerprenuer based on their ability to generate profit. We the owners of fashion lines, restuarants and beauty products on the level of profit they generate.
The last time I checked Kim K generates profit from her fashion line. Her fashion line, perfume and shoe are not considered an immoral products to sell. She has generated millions of dollars of profit from these lines. This objectively is considered a success and one infers that it takes marketing talent to generate this suceess.
If you look at every entreprenuer who is considered successful, the primary measurment is profit. It is irrelvant if you think the person is a whore, obnoxious, petty, arrogant or ingeniuine. When it comes to Kim K, it seems to me that people feel that their negatie opinions about her personality is justification to descredit her financial accomplishments.
She makes 20 million dollars over her salary on business and marketing ventures. This is more than many supermodels in the 90's and 00's. Why is this denied as marketing talent, when we use the same numerical statistics to determine other successful entreprenuers?
|
|
Myth Killer
Rochester, NY
|
want to move wrote: Kim's wedding..what a joke. The whole thing was a bad azz joke. Only in America coud a family with no talent get rich and be compared to royalty. If Kim and Company are America's royalty we are in worse shape then I thought we were and that's pretty bad.
Kim was the azz she is famous for...lol But one could ask what has Kate done on her own to merit fame? I know she is a nice person but that does not mean she has more observable skills than Kim K. All the haters love to mention how Kim K has benefited from a market savvy manager and wealth from her family before her reality show. Why is the same level of critism not leveled at Kate Middleton? She is famous for being in born in the right family! She did not earn Royalty, she was born into it. Everyone says it takes no talent to be on a reality show, but it also takes no talent to be PART OF THE ROYAL FAMILY. Kim EARNS income from her clothing, perfume and shoe line. She is an entreprenuer who has earned 20 million dollars over her regular salary. Is she just lucky when most reality stars, actors, and music stars do not earn close to this amount as entrerprenuers. Don't get me started on the stupid sex tape theory. If the sex tape was the sole reason for her success, Kendra Wilkinson would have the same level of endorsements and exposure as Kim K. Simply because you think Kate is a better person than Kim K does not mean she has more talent or is more deserving of being famous based on talent when it has been established that Kate does not sing, act or dance. (BTW What does a good AZZ convince female shoppers to buy her shoes?)
|
|
Myth Killer
Rochester, NY
|
Karelle94 wrote: I think the Royal Wedding was better. I think it was kind of stupid that they talked about Kim K's wedding like she's royalty too. For one, she only got famous off of her sex tape and she was friends with Paris Hilton. But the Kardashians are getting paid for having this wedding all thanks to Momma Kris Jenner. Kris Jenner might be superficial but she knows how to make money. But most of the Kardashians are superficial. I watch the reality TV show sometimes and Kim got upset at her hubby Kris because he tossed her in the water she lost her earring in the ocean at Bora Bora. The guy was just having fun and she started to make him worry about how the rest of the vacation would be with her and the rest of the family. The marriage mostlikely won't last long anyways. This is what I find hypocritical about how we percieve the royal family. I find wedding boring. However, I do not understand why the Royal Wedding does not receive the flack for being over the top. I understand the Royal Family evokes historical nostalgia. But come on! This thing was televised world wide. Yet, Kim gets flack for having an elaborate wedding which was not nearly as televised. YOu could argue neither of them deserve this coverage. Yet, KIm gets ripped for trying to be like the Royal Wedding. Why is he Royal Wedding so important?
|
|
Myth Killer
Rochester, NY
|
Kate is a nice person so she is more talented than Kim. Do you know that many talented people are tools, wife beaters, adulters and drunks? Why is that talentless is brought up in regards to Kim but you give Kate a pass? This clearly shows you base your decision on which personality you like the best. It is basic common sense that if we consider Kim K talentless based on the lacking of singing, dancing, or music talent, Kate Middleton should be considred talentless as well. I am puzzled why posters need to posit the claim that Kim is talentless when Kate has only shown she is a good person and role model.
Yeah, Kanye West is not talented because he is not a good role model.
|
|
Myth Killer
Rochester, NY
|
Mandi wrote: Can't compare them, Kate has class and comes from a family who carries themselves with respect and married a family who is actual real royalty.
Kim married for a TV show, her family has filthy mouths and they might have money but they ain't got no class! Their actions make them ugly. A lot of families carry themselves with respect. So what? Does that mean they should be famous? Why did Barbara Walters fail to tell Kate Middleton that she is described as someone who can not sing, dance or act? A lot of talented enterpreneuers have foul mouths and cheat on their spouses, they should not be famous for their talent. Why in the world the Royal Family gets this much attention? Their born into a historical family.
|
|
want to move
Deltona, FL
|
Myth Killer wrote: <quoted text>
But one could ask what has Kate done on her own to merit fame? I know she is a nice person but that does not mean she has more observable skills than Kim K. All the haters love to mention how Kim K has benefited from a market savvy manager and wealth from her family before her reality show. Why is the same level of critism not leveled at Kate Middleton? She is famous for being in born in the right family! She did not earn Royalty, she was born into it. Everyone says it takes no talent to be on a reality show, but it also takes no talent to be PART OF THE ROYAL FAMILY.
Kim EARNS income from her clothing, perfume and shoe line. She is an entreprenuer who has earned 20 million dollars over her regular salary. Is she just lucky when most reality stars, actors, and music stars do not earn close to this amount as entrerprenuers. Don't get me started on the stupid sex tape theory. If the sex tape was the sole reason for her success, Kendra Wilkinson would have the same level of endorsements and exposure as Kim K.
Simply because you think Kate is a better person than Kim K does not mean she has more talent or is more deserving of being famous based on talent when it has been established that Kate does not sing, act or dance.
(BTW What does a good AZZ convince female shoppers to buy her shoes?) Obsessed lonely sickos like you follow her every word and action...you are the same one that buy her crap.
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|
Libra
