Hillary: I will see a woman in W.H.

The president will continue to reflect the mood and economic status of the nation. it will be off by an election or so. but it will be worse. Playing games will not change that outcome. the current president has mad ethe growing police state tyranny ten times worse then the other before him. The next one will continue that unless a person of freedom.

Dumb Quotes by Sen. Hillary Clinton

By Daniel Kurtzman,
About.com Guide


"I'm not going to put my lot in with economists." --after being asked by George Stephanopoulos about economists' claims that her gas tax holiday proposal would not bring down gas prices


"On a couple of occasions in the last weeks, I just said some things that I knew not to be the case." --on misspeaking about her Bosnia visit


"The question is, we face a lot of dangers in the world and, in the gentleman's words, we face a lot of evil men. And what in my background equips me to deal with evil and bad men?" --laughing off a question from a voter who asked Clinton what qualified her to deal with leaders from countries such as Iran and North Korea


"I just want to add, I did not say that it should be done, but I certainly recognize why Gov. Spitzer is trying to do it. And we have failed." --responding in a Democratic debate to New York Gov. Elliot Spitzer's plan to give drivers' licenses to illegal immigrants. Moments earlier, Clinton had said, "They are driving on our roads. The possibility of them having an accident that harms themselves or others is just a matter of the odds."

"Aww don't feel noways tired. I've come too faarrr from where I started frum." --adopting a Southern drawl while speaking at a church (Watch video clip)

"We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."


http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/hillarycli...

pigpen911 wrote:

<quoted text>Will you stop it? My sides hurt from laughing,oh wait,you were just posting the facts!! Got to say that those liberal/progressive dems are a joke a second. Keep up the good work,PP911.

They really are a despicable band of Charlatans.

serfs up wrote:

The president will continue to reflect the mood and economic status of the nation. it will be off by an election or so. but it will be worse. Playing games will not change that outcome. the current president has mad ethe growing police state tyranny ten times worse then the other before him. The next one will continue that unless a person of freedom.

Obama 'Devastating' For Civil Liberties



October 10, 2011

Jonathan Turley argues in a recent op-ed in the Los Angeles Times that "the election of Barack Obama may stand as one of the single most devastating events in our history for civil liberties." He says President Obama has continued many of the most controversial Bush administration programs.


OHN DONVAN, host: And now, the Opinion Page. After eight years under President Bush, many civil libertarians were thrilled when Barack Obama won the 2008 election. What a difference a few years make. Law Professor Jonathan Turley argues in a recent op-ed that, quote, "the election of Barack Obama may stand as one of the single most devastating events in our history for civil liberties." Now, if you supported President Obama in the last election, we want to know: How important is this issue of civil liberties to you? Will it make or break your support for the president going forward?(Slurp-Slurp)


So Jonathan Turley, he's a law professor at George Washington University. His piece, "Obama: A Disaster for Civil Liberties," ran last month in the Los Angeles Times, and he joins us now in Studio 3A. So you say of President Obama that his election may be one of the single most devastating events in our history for civil liberties? That is very, very strong language, Jonathan.

JONATHAN TURLEY: It is a strong language, but I think civil libertarians are coming to grips with what is really a building disaster for our movement, and it's been a rather difficult process. You know, I have a large civil liberties blog, and there's a lot of soul-searching among civil libertarians about what exactly happened. But we are engaging in a sense of collective denial when we deal with President Obama.

DONVAN: You mean you're not talking about it publicly.

TURLEY: Yeah. And I think that's part of the purpose of this column, is to address the fact that President Obama is a perfect nightmare when it comes to civil liberties. He not only adopted most of President Bush's policies in the civil liberties areas when it comes to terrorism, but he actually expanded on them. He outdid George Bush.

And they range. His position on torture and refusing to have people investigated or prosecuted for torture, on privacy lawsuits. He pushed aggressively for the dismissal of dozens of lawsuits brought by private interest organizations. He's for immunity for people who engaged in warrantless surveillance. He has fought standing for people even to be able to get courts to review his programs, much like George Bush. He kept military tribunals and the authority to make the discretionary choice of sending some people to a real court, some people to a military tribunal. He has asserted the right to kill U.S. citizens based solely on his own discretion, that he believes them to be a threat to the country.

His administration has, once again, as with the Bush administration, cited secret law, that - and including a case of assassinating citizens - a law that we're not allowed to see, but we have to trust them.



http://www.npr.org/2011/10/10/141213273/op-ed...

GALLUP: ROMNEY RETAKES LEAD...

POLL: ALL TIED UP IN SWING STATES...

Opens double-digit margin among independents...

OBAMA KICKS OFF TO EMPTY SEATS...

Otis B Driftwood wrote:

The libs are hoping for a lesbian or a transgendered freak that's had it lopped off.

You have to admit that having a 'dyke' in the office would be more 'balls-ie' than what we have now ....

Yep.

Le Jimbo wrote:

GALLUP: ROMNEY RETAKES LEAD...
POLL: ALL TIED UP IN SWING STATES...
Opens double-digit margin among independents...
OBAMA KICKS OFF TO EMPTY SEATS...

LOL Jimbo!!!

An empty suit kicking of to empty seats. <gotta love it>

Eleanor wrote:

<quoted text>
You have to admit that having a 'dyke' in the office would be more 'balls-ie' than what we have now ....
Yep.

(Excluding Bawney Fwank) Who doesn't like Women? And a female president is fine with me as long as she does the job well and isn't another crook (which excludes Hillary).:)

No surprise that the so-called "Liberal" is spamming the thread like crazy as part of his far right jihad against Democrats.

Those Republicans sure know how to hate, don't they?:)

tha Professor wrote:

Hillary P.S.:
"It will be me."
;)

yep, she saw a women in the white house....under the desk, in a blue dress.

tha Professor wrote:

No surprise that the so-called "Liberal" is spamming the thread like crazy as part of his far right jihad against Democrats.
Those Republicans sure know how to hate, don't they?:)

GALLUP: ROMNEY RETAKES LEAD...

POLL: ALL TIED UP IN SWING STATES...

Opens double-digit margin among independents...

OBAMA KICKS OFF TO EMPTY SEATS...

Le Jimbo wrote:

GALLUP: ROMNEY RETAKES LEAD...
POLL: ALL TIED UP IN SWING STATES...
Opens double-digit margin among independents...
OBAMA KICKS OFF TO EMPTY SEATS...

Ohio, Obama 47.5, Willard 43.8
PA, Obama 46.0, Willard 39.0
Michigan, Obama 50.3, Willard 39.0
Wisconsin, Obama 51.7, Willard 39.3

Otis B Driftwood wrote:

The libs are hoping for a lesbian or a transgendered freak that's had it lopped off.

Hellary fits that bill.

if true, we need only post menapousal or women with hystorectomies as candidates so we don't get in a war every 28 days, oh wait whats in the white hut now starts something about every 28 days now. You don't suppose he might be a TG do ya ?

This feminist douche bag is getting fatter and more grotesque-looking day by day.

What is it that liberals say,
'beauty is only skin deep'?
In Hillary's case, uglyness is to the bone.

Bill said the same thing.

Now that they know what obama can actually do, the democrats regret backing obama over hillary. It is safe to say she would have been a FAR better president.

Le Jimbo wrote:

<quoted text>yep, she saw a women in the white house....under the desk, in a blue dress.

Republicans sure do love themselves some of those sex scandals, don't they? I think it's because their sexuality is so often in the closet...:)

RustyS wrote:

Now that they know what obama can actually do, the democrats regret backing obama over hillary. It is safe to say she would have been a FAR better president.

"Safe," since you have no supporting evidence.:)

Papillon wrote:

This feminist douche bag is getting fatter and more grotesque-looking day by day.
What is it that liberals say,
'beauty is only skin deep'?
In Hillary's case, uglyness is to the bone.

Right wing extremists prefer pretty, vapid, programmed blonde Fox News talking heads. They're the right's idea of 'beautiful,' sadly.