SUBJECT: It needs ANSWERS OF valid and good evidential facts presentation to the PUBLIC because BIN Laden is specifically RELATED TO SPECIFIC 9-11 as a special and specific case, AND not the other terrorists.
This Bin Laden is unlike most other terrorists, because he claimed on video he had done the biggest event of 9-11 inside the soil of US.
How could Obama be a commander-in-chief JUST LOOKING AT dealing with Bin Laden case?
Listen = until you ever become mature, get to know the big difference of this special one --Bin Laden said he MASTERMINDED “”THE INVASION OF HITTING US FOR 9-11“”???---in comparison to HUGE difference with others called combatants because those were the ones who fought against “”US INVASION”” of Afghanistan.
So Bin Laden, was unlike other terrorist, as he was the special one terrorist that any commander-in-chief would have to develop the plan to get him alive WHENEVER POSSIBLE WITH SPECIAL FORCE and catch him only shot dead if it takes no other choice in case of the real occurrence.
Because this Bin laden captured the psychic of many public as public would want full facts and answers, any mature able commander HAD BETTER had to make sure he would show evidences of caught Bin Laden, that photos of Laden must show him alive being handcuffed even he was locked in prison in Cuba or going for trial in US or anywhere.
And if Laden was armed and resisted heavily in a fight , then it led to the happening that he was shot, evidences and true facts of his dead body must be shown and demonstrated to the pubic.
There is not a reason whatsoever with wrong answers by Obama since US had been engaging in a war in Afghanistan (which is of a much bigger weight ) for some time and not any violences in other parts of the world have erupted as a result of that war aganst Talibans (or Al Qaeda).
If they are still there fighting Talibans and Al Qaeda in AFGHANISTAN and in the region, why would not the Al Qaeda and Muslims elsewhere rage violence in the discontentment of Afghanistan since it is a very bigger thing --as Obama says violence would be there?
It does not make sense since they told Bin Laden was not close to, being viewed as great chief for Al Qaeda in his later period, how would Obama say by releasing evidences of dead Bin Laden would erupt violence since Al Qaeda would not care about Laden?
How does Obama's saying, by this time, STILL distorts AND FABRICATES FALSEHOOD again that he said he instructed the Seals to fight against Pakistani soldiers ( WITH NO NEED TO ) since the Pakistan intelligence gave CIA information Of Bin Laden, and that means Pakistan accommodated and welcomed and let Seals in to get Bin Laden and Pakistan IS supposed to collect the reward MONEY sums (for informAtion and helping ) from USA, on --dead or alive business REWARD, placed in by Bush a long time ago?
There needs concerning THIS SPECIAL terrorist BIN LADEN requiring release of CRUCIAL AND SUBSTANTIAL evidences and true facts BECAUSE HE was the one CONFESSING AND TALKING A LOT, related to the particular 9-11.
THE TREATMENT OF 9-11 MATTER IS A SPECIAL MATTER, FOR SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCES OF Bin LADEN (DEAD OR ALIVE) must be warranted AS FULL ANSWERS TO THE PUBLIC , UNLIKE THOSE COMBATANTS OR TERRORISTS THERE, BECAUSE us INVADED THEM IN AFGHANISTAN--- but (UNLIKE Bin LADEN) THEY DID NOT DO 9-11 , unless they had committed crimes against US.