|
DDs
UK
|
McCabe Sizzles wrote: <quoted text> If you're doing that Emmett(and it no longer surprises me to believe you are capable of it), then you are even lower than can be imagined. Hopefully, her mail is screened before it ever gets before her. If not, then God have mercy on you or whoever continues to agonize her with their hatred. Hi Sizzles, That is probably just another Target lie. Mailing it doesn't mean she reads it. lmao And, if someone is HARASSING Virgie through the US Postal service, that is a Federal crime.
|
|
DDs
Netherlands
|
Thanks wrote: <quoted text> The thought that Virgie would read the contents of these Anna Nicole Smith Forum threads should make everyone cringe. I wonder if Virgie would approve Nelda Turner's confidential medical information being posted here, with the excuse, "The clerk's filing mistake was our advantage." I wonder if Virgie would say, "What is wrong with those people?" Yes, Virgie, they are capable of anything. No, I could never send Virgie the content of these threads. It would break her heart to see what is said and done by the very people who claim to support her. If your conscience can't be your guide, then let Virgie be. Oh please! as if there is anything here more shocking than media has spewed for years. Or that raunchy show of her's that foddered a great many harsh comments. Are you so stupid that you think Virgie was a good cop for almost 30 yrs, dealing with druggies, and you think she doesn't know what comes with that low life? What a lame brain. Stop pretending to know Virgie and using her for your chill attempts. We all know you aren't even allowed to contact her because you are a WEIRDO.
|
|
DDs
Anonymous Proxy
|
Melissa Byrum wrote: <quoted text> LOL, NO joke. I can "see" that pesky clean hands doctrine being a REAL BOOGER for her. The BOOGER Blogger and her Flonase. EWWWW Hope the attys had some Purell!
|
|
SusieQ
Little Suamico, WI
|
Dink wrote: <quoted text> For the love of all that's good and holy woman.....here it is in a nuthell since you continue to prove you can't back up your claim and CONTINUE harping on it. It IS very SIMPLE...... post the minute marker in that video that shows "with certainty" there is a car seat. I did it to show that the driver was requested to roll up the windows..and it WAS very simple..took me very little time to back up what I said! Why do you want to continue to prove that you cannot back up your claim by keeping the converstaion about it going? it is EXTREMELY simple...nothing complicated at all about proving what you say with certainty. SHEEEEEEEEESH I am done trying to answer you Dink...can't you for once just drop it??????? Good Heavens all ready..it's over.
|
|
Baloney
Sandusky, MI
|
SusieQ wrote: <quoted text>I am done trying to answer you Dink...can't you for once just drop it??????? Good Heavens all ready..it's over. LOL!!!!! How many times does that make now that you've been done?
|
|
Dink
AOL
|
SusieQ wrote: <quoted text>I am done trying to answer you Dink...can't you for once just drop it??????? Good Heavens all ready..it's over. AGAIN????? rofl I said two days ago that "I UNDERSTAND" you cannot back up what you said....OK...I GET IT...I UNDERSTAND...IT'S OK...I NEVER EXPECTED YOU TO......any other way I get the point across that I accept your refusal? sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh!
|
|
DDs
Netherlands
|
SusieQ wrote: <quoted text>Are you trying to out do DD?? Nasty! Nasty! Who could respect your opinion after this. Ish! Speak for yourself AXpsycho. I happen to respect Sizzles opinions. Her take on Targets is spot on! His ridiculous threats to Sizzles are nothing but a Coward sitting behind a screen with much for brains. They have no merit and he only proves what a dumb azz he is.
|
|
Since: Feb 10
Coleridge, NE
|
Please wait...
Thanks wrote: <quoted text> Well, that's you, Razzy. Fortunately, Virgie isn't built that way. She wouldn't say something like, "It serves the witch right." The word "revenge" isn't in her vocabulary. Virgie is seeking vindication, and she has an excellent team of lawyers who are helping her achieve it. The day Virgie wins her defamation case is the day she'll be vindicated and she can stand proud knowing she went about it the right away, through the courts, without wishing harm or revenge or bad luck on defendants like Turner. Quit pretending that you know how VA is "built."
|
|
|
Baloney
Sandusky, MI
|
Melissa Byrum wrote: <quoted text> LOL, NO joke. I can "see" that pesky clean hands doctrine being a REAL BOOGER for her. Yeah, that's one booger that she'd have a hard time flicking off her finger. Rose's site is hilarious today - they Sternies are wondering if Sizzles can be charged with HIPPA violations. Beth, who is only one step evolved from Batty Bev, is talking about the, "STUPID, NO CLASS whatsoever posters who have gone off the deep end with their IMAGINED HATE of HKS and anyone who supports him in getting FAIR treatment in the Courts" Doesn't she remember that the hag's motivation in 'digging up dirt' on Virgie was to prevent Virgie from getting FAIR treatment in the courts...and that it was done at Howard's request?
|
|
DDs
Seoul, Korea
|
Baloney wrote: <quoted text> Ask Rose, she's the one tracking IP locations. Go ahead, she's sitting right across from you. lol Where's Targets with his fake indignation and threats on that one? pfft Nelda omitted telling the court she is a 'semi expert' in using her site for nefarious reasons to out personally identifying information. Looks like saying she respects all opinions was perjury.
|
|
Since: Feb 10
Coleridge, NE
|
Please wait...
Thanks wrote: <quoted text> So you did it out of revenge. Good to know. Glad you admitted it. Now you won't have to think of ways of denying it. It was done with malice. That makes a big difference, you know. Turner learned her lesson a long time ago. She's swallowed the bitter pill when she figured out she was being used by the same people she thought she was helping. She, nor anyone else, needs someone like you, QV or SheStone to bear the torch of revenge by pulling stunts from the sidelines. Face it, Sizzles. What you did was morally wrong. And now that you've admitted you did it as an act of revenge, with malice, it isn't going to be too difficult for a lawyer to convince a judge that what you did was legally wrong as well and that you've committed a crime. Neither you nor nelda has a decent bone in your bodies and your mr know it all persona is annoying as hell. You lecturing anyone on morality is a farce. Sickening really. nelda can go piss up a rope, she has reaped what she has sown and no one gives a shit about her or her feelings. After all, she didn't give one thought about VA and her feelings.
|
|
SusieQ
Little Suamico, WI
|
DDs wrote: <quoted text> Speak for yourself AXpsycho. I happen to respect Sizzles opinions. Her take on Targets is spot on! His ridiculous threats to Sizzles are nothing but a Coward sitting behind a screen with much for brains. They have no merit and he only proves what a dumb azz he is. Sizzles has almost as foul a mouth as you...and she thinks she is way too important. A Joke. I like THANKS posts, even though I disagree with his feelings about HKS, he is very clear in what he has to say and is most kind to all who treat him decently and even to those who don't. He has said nice things to you, that I can't understand as you have been quite horrid to him. But then, you are such a DORK.
|
|
Baloney
Sandusky, MI
|
chalkdust wrote: <quoted text> Neither you nor nelda has a decent bone in your bodies and your mr know it all persona is annoying as hell. You lecturing anyone on morality is a farce. Sickening really. nelda can go piss up a rope, she has reaped what she has sown and no one gives a shit about her or her feelings. After all, she didn't give one thought about VA and her feelings. Nelda also didn't give a thought to DL. Her attempts to vilify Virgie and turn legal and public opinion against her could have resulted in DL winding up in foster care or worse...but at least Rose would have had her fame.
|
|
SusieQ
Little Suamico, WI
|
Baloney wrote: <quoted text> LOL!!!!! How many times does that make now that you've been done? Dink just keeps on...seems she doesn't like to let go.
|
|
Baloney
Sandusky, MI
|
SusieQ wrote: <quoted text>Dink just keeps on...seems she doesn't like to let go. Oh. So Dink has been twisting your arm and forcing you to respond to her posts? Amazing, she can make you respond repeatedly but she can't make you answer a simple question.
|
|
Dink
AOL
|
SusieQ wrote: <quoted text>Dink just keeps on...seems she doesn't like to let go. I let it go 2 days ago Susie....LOL I said "I UNDERSTAND" 2..count them...2 days ago. roflmao Don't ever change ok? I realize you cannot back up what you said..I realized that 2 days ago...I will simply continue to repeat that every time you continue to post on the ridiculous subject. Your avoidance is noted and was expected, I UNDERSTAND.....now are you REALLY done, I sure hope so? LOL
|
|
Fanciulla
Elmwood Park, IL
|
I have been wondering why Stern supporters are acussing some posters of "trashing Anna", why all of a sudden, are they concerned with comments that could be detrimental to Anna's reputation or that can further damage her image? I won't fall into that trap, I am not going to cut and paste everything negative that has been written against Anna to prove to them that all the things that were previously said about her, are "substantially true". I am not going to make the mistake to put the victim on trial. The blame lies were it is belong, with those who provide the drugs that ended her life, with Stern and the doctors. To blame and dehumanize the victim has been a common resort of the guilty. Before the preliminary hearing, documents of the FBI investigation were punlished by AP: Anna Nicole Smith investigated in murder plot Wednesday, October 7, 2009 8:54 AM http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_ne... The preliminary hearing commenced October 13th, 2009. == And, before the February 5th hearing to set the trial date, AP unearthed other documents through a FOIA request: Anna Nicole Smith Bankruptcy Details Revealed January 27, 2010, 3:46 PM ET. According to the AP, in addition the $43,000-plus fur coat and the six pigs, Smith also possessed a safety box filled with nearly $1 million worth of jewelry as well as her calendar and a bottle of perfume. The documents, which the AP received from the federal government through a Freedom of Information Act request, also show that Smith was missing about $2.7 million in jewelry, including a platinum necklace with 226 diamonds totaling nearly 74 carats. As for Smith herself, the Chapter 11 examiner appointed to probe her financial situation during her bankruptcy proceeding reported that “she did not know why she was in bankruptcy.” And in an interview with Smith at her home, the unidentified official said Smith appeared to be drugged and took pills throughout the meeting. “She could barely walk, her speech was slurred, she had to lay down in a darkened room as the light bothered her and she could not remember what she said from one moment to the next,” the examiner reported. http://blogs.wsj.com/bankruptcy/2010/01/27/an... The AP article was picked up by MSNBC, CNN, CBS, NBC, an many other media sources. I am wondering which other documents are going to surface before Stern's trial start on August 4th, 2010. Anna was dubbed "a gold digger", "a monument to vulgarity" and many other appelatives by the media, but ultimately, it was Stern's drugs what killed her.
|
|
nobody has to answer
Marysville, CA
|
Baloney wrote: <quoted text> Oh. So Dink has been twisting your arm and forcing you to respond to her posts? Amazing, she can make you respond repeatedly but she can't make you answer a simple question. No - Dink just wants the last word, and is acting like a toddler. Read her words again to the other poster, it is an underlying threat of trying to force her to stop - childish. The other poster should just type, I HAVE THE LAST WORD on this! If Dink types back then it is she that cannot let it go.*grinning*
|
|
Dink
AOL
|
Baloney wrote: <quoted text> Oh. So Dink has been twisting your arm and forcing you to respond to her posts? Amazing, she can make you respond repeatedly but she can't make you answer a simple question. It really is ridiculous----I was done two days ago when she cound't back up her claim....I clearly said I understood and was done.....that's fine. I would not continue to call attention to my inability to back up what I say.....but I guess we're all different.....may I repeat...SHEESH!
|
|
Dink
AOL
|
Hiya Rock~~ I never thought about it the way you worded it. You're right tho. Several have said that Anna would be put on trial when the time comes...her bad choices and her lifestyle choices. Will that now become the focus?
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|