D.A. Moves Forward With Appeal Of Judge Perry's Ruling In Criminal case

"Prosecutors gave notice Friday that they are moving forward with their appeal of a judge's decision to throw out nearly all of the charges on which Anna Nicole Smith's longtime companion and a psychiatrist were convicted last year.

In papers filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, Deputy District Attorney Irene Wakabayashi wrote that the prosecution is taking its case to California's 2nd District Court of Appeal.

The filing comes almost two months after Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry tossed out the only two charges on which Howard K. Stern was convicted and three of the four charges on which Smith's former next-door neighbor, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, was found guilty."

http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/entertainment/...

Everyone is welcome to post their opinions, this is a public thread, registration or membership is not required to post. LOL

Fanciulla wrote:

Everyone is welcome to post their opinions, this is a public thread, registration or membership is not required to post. LOL

Hi Fan. This won't work. We tried several new threads to get away from "someone", but she brought her bag of garbage over anyway. So we tried another thread. And she followed. JFA doesn't own the thread, and majority doesn't rule here. It's a public thread, owned by topix. If she wants a private spot, let her spit up the money for a chatroom.

Whack A Mole wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Fan. This won't work. We tried several new threads to get away from "someone", but she brought her bag of garbage over anyway. So we tried another thread. And she followed. JFA doesn't own the thread, and majority doesn't rule here. It's a public thread, owned by topix. If she wants a private spot, let her spit up the money for a chatroom.

Yea, we tried the same thing...it didn't work for us either. LOL!!!

Hi all...

Rock..from all I'm reading, the DECISION to allow the appeal, or not, could take a long time??? Not just the appeal itself, if granted.

Thanks for the link BTW.

The above was a question by the way..lol

Tialicious wrote:

<quoted text>
Yea, we tried the same thing...it didn't work for us either. LOL!!!

Yep, funny how all she talks is about being followed, just like they followed. Too funny. Poor tang must have lucky withdrawals or something.

Did you know all these years that Whack was always to first one to bring it up? Yep, FACT

Very odd, she is NOT talking the cases either, hmmmm. There all done. Im going to talk about the cases on the thread we started and no amount of bullchit will make it stop. They can start their own threads to end up dead end again all they want.

The appeal? Yes, Whack, THE APPEAL or any case is the topic, focus Whack focus. A lost cause. The Judge knew their might be an appeal and went by the book and allowed it to go to jury. The prosecution made so many mistakes and he knew it.

buh bye

Actually, last time I looked, this was a free country. And since you don't own topix, I'll post about whatever I want. It won't include you. How about that.

Anyone have a good recipe for fried chicken? I'm bored with mine.

Whack A Mole wrote:

Actually, last time I looked, this was a free country. And since you don't own topix, I'll post about whatever I want. It won't include you. How about that.
Anyone have a good recipe for fried chicken? I'm bored with mine.

i HATE chicken

Fanciulla wrote:

"Prosecutors gave notice Friday that they are moving forward with their appeal of a judge's decision to throw out nearly all of the charges on which Anna Nicole Smith's longtime companion and a psychiatrist were convicted last year.
In papers filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, Deputy District Attorney Irene Wakabayashi wrote that the prosecution is taking its case to California's 2nd District Court of Appeal.
The filing comes almost two months after Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Robert J. Perry tossed out the only two charges on which Howard K. Stern was convicted and three of the four charges on which Smith's former next-door neighbor, Dr. Khristine Eroshevich, was found guilty."
http://www.nbcphiladelphia.com/entertainment/...

Fanci,
I have some issued from the transcript on January 6, 2011 you mind if I debate them here?

correction issues, sorry

Windi- wrote:

<quoted text>
i HATE chicken

Okay, I'm up for anything. I've just had my fill of accusations, threats and anger. All I want is a peaceful place to post, minus the insults and crap. I don't care what the topic is....LOL

DLSGMA wrote:

<quoted text>
Fanci,
I have some issued from the transcript on January 6, 2011 you mind if I debate them here?

Please feel free to post whatever you wish to discuss. Everybody is welcome to express their opinions.

Have you read the transcript from 1/6/11?

follow the leader wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, funny how all she talks is about being followed, just like they followed. Too funny. Poor tang must have lucky withdrawals or something.
Did you know all these years that Whack was always to first one to bring it up? Yep, FACT
Very odd, she is NOT talking the cases either, hmmmm. There all done. Im going to talk about the cases on the thread we started and no amount of bullchit will make it stop. They can start their own threads to end up dead end again all they want.
The appeal? Yes, Whack, THE APPEAL or any case is the topic, focus Whack focus. A lost cause. The Judge knew their might be an appeal and went by the book and allowed it to go to jury. The prosecution made so many mistakes and he knew it.

Twinkles wrote:

<quoted text>
She along with everyone else wants the garbage off of here. No harm in that is there Fanci, unless you like plowing thru AOL, Bella, and Alamo nonstop attacks here?
Perhaps they can take it back to the dead thread, thats why they are all here in the first place, take it back to the thread Clues started or start a new one. Just NOT here where we have fun, relax and talk about the cases.

I definitely have not enjoyed plowing through your relentless roboposting, and off topic comments, a tactic that you have used for years to disrupt the discussions on other threads. For a very long time, under several pseudonymous, you have delivered multiple avalanches of vile insults against every poster who ever made a comment on those threads. Uttered threats in an attempt to create a chilling effect on those who wished to express their opinions. I lost count of how many times I have been forced to scroll through your obsessive ramblings, disorganized diatribe, and useless banter.

P.S. I brought the comment to this thread because you are already here to do the same thing that you have done on every other thread.

DLSGMA wrote:

Have you read the transcript from 1/6/11?

Yes, I did. Right after the sentencing hearing.

On page 6 of the transcript Mr. Carney for the People says, "At this time we haven't made a final determination."

Earlier, Judge Perry, asked if they were going to retry the conspiracy cases on the object crime.

WHY would they not want to retry the Case?

Dink for 4yrs wrote:

Hi all...
Rock..from all I'm reading, the DECISION to allow the appeal, or not, could take a long time??? Not just the appeal itself, if granted.
Thanks for the link BTW.

It is my understanding that it might take a few months before the appeal is placed on the calendar, assigned to a division and a panel of justices.

I don't believe that the Court of Appeals is going to refuse to review the case, but, in this saga, everything is possible. IYNWIM.

DLSGMA wrote:

On page 6 of the transcript Mr. Carney for the People says, "At this time we haven't made a final determination."
Earlier, Judge Perry, asked if they were going to retry the conspiracy cases on the object crime.
WHY would they not want to retry the Case?

Do you have the link to the transcript? TIA