Does Angelina Jolie Know? Jennifer Aniston, Brad Pitt Now Talking

Judged:

1

jen wrote:

Brad going to meet the plastic women full of Botox and silicon

betty wrote:

WHO CARE! jENIFER SO UGLY. FAKED.

Judged:

2

2

1

jen wrote:

The plastic women Jenifer Aniston might get Brad back. Because all of her dating guys gone.Only stuppid Brad left. He was idiot to married her. Now he want marry her again with the support from his ugly mother Jane.

Judged:

1

1

Vince wrote:

<quoted text>
Now here is a poster that articulates their opinion well...I certainly will consider what they said it was so well written...LMAO

Judged:

1

NIC wrote:

Oh really..Spammy..you don't say that when Chicken says it..
Go back a couple of her posts..She goes on and on about it
If you want to complain go straight to the source...That being Chicken..
Yep tedious it is..but it doesn't stop chicken..LOL!

Judged:

1

1

Pamela wrote:

<quoted text>
Top of the Morning Nickie Nu Nu! I have to say I don't remember Chick Flick ever talking about Botox, Silicone, or age. Off topic: I am really hoping Britney Spears will do a great job at the
VH1 Awards show this Sunday!

Pamela wrote:

<quoted text>
Top of the Morning Nickie Nu Nu! I have to say I don't remember Chick Flick ever talking about Botox, Silicone, or age. Off topic: I am really hoping Britney Spears will do a great job at the
VH1 Awards show this Sunday!

Judged:

1

Mayson wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey Pamela,
I do Hope Brittany can pull this off, now that she seems to be getting on the right track,
Shes been thru alot.....

Judged:

1

1

1

Gisella wrote:

Jennifer does not seem vulnerable at all. She is a lady in control. Nothing about her life seems out of order and in complete chaos like Jolie.Who in their right mind after all would adopt children from the world over and then have three children in less than 5 years?Any wise person would care have planned the adoptions and spaced them out better and had serious discussion with their partner about adopting children in the first place.

Chick Flick wrote:

<quoted text>
I do believe that Trampelina has been very compulsive with creating that family. I do admire anyone who adopts a needy child - it's really a marvelous thing to do - but it seems that Trampie has been driven to keep adding children to the mix (and again, I think it's great that she's adopted children), without stopping to let each child have time and space in the family and allow the family to grow at a reasonable space. But, who am I to judge? JMHO.
I still wonder if Armpitt was serious about adding TWO MORE kids to the family next year ...???

Gisella wrote:

Jennifer does not seem vulnerable at all. She is a lady in control. Nothing about her life seems out of order and in complete chaos like Jolie.Who in their right mind after all would adopt children from the world over and then have three children in less than 5 years?Any wise person would care have planned the adoptions and spaced them out better and had serious discussion with their partner about adopting children in the first place.

Gisella wrote:

Jennifer does not seem vulnerable at all. She is a lady in control. Nothing about her life seems out of order and in complete chaos like Jolie.Who in their right mind after all would adopt children from the world over and then have three children in less than 5 years?Any wise person would care have planned the adoptions and spaced them out better and had serious discussion with their partner about adopting children in the first place.

Pamela wrote:

<quoted text>
The Botox, plastic, silicone, and age related comments about Aniston are tedious. If that is all people have, then you really don't have any type of meaningful case against the woman. I mean come on, a Hollywood actress who has plastic surgery and Botox? Now, that's truly shocking.
__________

Pamela wrote:

<quoted text>
I know, I really feel for her- she seems so vulnerable. I can't help rooting for her! Was glad she won an ward and got a standing ovation. Hopefully she will get her self straight and back on track- for the sake of those little boys at least.