Angelina Jolie Needs to get married before any more adoptions.

Posted in the Angelina Jolie Forum

Comments
1 - 20 of 50 Comments Last updated May 3, 2012
First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Michael Hsu

San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Mar 7, 2007
 

Judged:

1

Does anyone else think it's immoral for Angelina to be adopting more babies out of wedlock?
maysan

San Mateo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Mar 7, 2007
 

Judged:

1

yes,,you would have thought having Shiloh they would have,,but if you read why they wont get married,,brad says until gay marriages are legal thats when he will marry,,like that has anything to do w/getting married,,he married jenn right?
rachel

Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Mar 7, 2007
 
Michael Hsu wrote:
Does anyone else think it's immoral for Angelina to be adopting more babies out of wedlock?
If she can afford to adopt lots of kids why not?
rachel

Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Mar 7, 2007
 

Judged:

1

1

maysan wrote:
yes,,you would have thought having Shiloh they would have,,but if you read why they wont get married,,brad says until gay marriages are legal thats when he will marry,,like that has anything to do w/getting married,,he married jenn right?
Brad was married to Jen, how come they dissolved that marriage? Because they no longer love each other. Love is the most important ingredient for a marriage to work. So stop saying silly things.
maysan

San Mateo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Mar 7, 2007
 

Judged:

1

rachel wrote:
<quoted text>
Brad was married to Jen, how come they dissolved that marriage? Because they no longer love each other. Love is the most important ingredient for a marriage to work. So stop saying silly things.
you stop ,,,brad loved jenn enough to marry her ,,,love does not just go away,,you said it best love is the most important ingredient!!!!!
Nicki

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Sep 28, 2008
 

Judged:

1

And he will never forget her no matter how many kids he has or adopts or how many places they live. I'm sure there are times he wishes he could go back to a simpler life although he might not ever admit it.
Mayson

Oakland, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Oct 1, 2008
 
Nicki wrote:
And he will never forget her no matter how many kids he has or adopts or how many places they live. I'm sure there are times he wishes he could go back to a simpler life although he might not ever admit it.
Yep, Bradley can dream all he wants now!lol
<Dreamweaver>

I watched Iron Man Last Nite, and well Robert Downey jr was just awesome in it, hes not bad looking at all. The graphics were so cool, I enjoyed the movie, Oh and Jeff Bridges I didnt even know it was him at first, his voice is what gave him away.
Sharon

Denver, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Oct 1, 2008
 
It really is awful that these two don't get married, just a bad example to younger people. Can encourage other people not to get married but to think that it's ok to have children out of wedlock. There is also a spiritual principle behind this but seems like a lot of people don't care about that basically because of ignorance. When a country has a lot of immorality in it, it is just not possible to say "God bless us". How can he. America in general is on dangerous ground.

I was wondering what they will do if they split. Although the adopted children have taken his last name as well, they are not legally his, are they?
Vince

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Oct 1, 2008
 
rachel wrote:
<quoted text>
Brad was married to Jen, how come they dissolved that marriage? Because they no longer love each other. Love is the most important ingredient for a marriage to work. So stop saying silly things.
A opinion was given because the thread asked for one...you can disagree but the opinion is as valid as any you may have...personal attacks serve no purpose and don't futher discussion.
Pamela

AOL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Oct 3, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

Just because someone has lots of money does not mean it is ok for them to excessively adopt. I was taken aback the other day.

Background. I live on 11 acres of land, have two dogs, two cats, two hermit crabs (not by choice) fish, and little chameleons. On our property there are deer, turkeys, geese, and all kinds of wild birds, I had my boys out the other day and we were walking around Pet Smart where they have stray cats and dogs. My boys wanted to get these kittens and were talking to the lady holding them. She asked about what animals we had.(I had no intention of getting any more animals). She looked at the boys and said: "Well, we would not let you adopt these kittens because you already have so many other animals you would be unable to give the new animals the time, attention, and care they deserve."

I really hope Pitt and Jolie will stop and focus on the children they have. Even though they have endless resources and can afford any type of help,
it's still hard when there are that many young children and you continue to add.
Chick Flick

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Oct 4, 2008
 
Nicki wrote:
And he will never forget her no matter how many kids he has or adopts or how many places they live. I'm sure there are times he wishes he could go back to a simpler life although he might not ever admit it.
That's what I suspect, too. I mean, the guy is on a hamster wheel now - and even though I'm sure he loves the kids, it has to be a huge responsibility and drain, even if there's alot of money and help. Whorie wants to adopt more, too! Okay, so Armpitt is an adult, and he's right where he thought he wanted to be (like that old say, "be careful for you wish for," and all that)- and IF he's unhappy or feels overwhelmed by the situation he's in, that's his own doing. But what about all the children in that household? How on earth can Armpitt and Whorie parent those kids - really parent them, giving each one ample time and attention - when they keep adding more kids to the mix? Maybe they've been talking with Michelle D.
Chick Flick

Seattle, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Oct 4, 2008
 
Pamela wrote:
Just because someone has lots of money does not mean it is ok for them to excessively adopt. I was taken aback the other day.
Background. I live on 11 acres of land, have two dogs, two cats, two hermit crabs (not by choice) fish, and little chameleons. On our property there are deer, turkeys, geese, and all kinds of wild birds, I had my boys out the other day and we were walking around Pet Smart where they have stray cats and dogs. My boys wanted to get these kittens and were talking to the lady holding them. She asked about what animals we had.(I had no intention of getting any more animals). She looked at the boys and said: "Well, we would not let you adopt these kittens because you already have so many other animals you would be unable to give the new animals the time, attention, and care they deserve."
I really hope Pitt and Jolie will stop and focus on the children they have. Even though they have endless resources and can afford any type of help,
it's still hard when there are that many young children and you continue to add.
Hi, Pamela! That's what I think, too. Sounds like you have an idyllic situation there. I bet your children really love having animals and lots of room to run around on.

Since: Jun 07

New York, NY - Lives in Taipei

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Oct 7, 2008
 
Pamela wrote:
Just because someone has lots of money does not mean it is ok for them to excessively adopt. I was taken aback the other day.
Background. I live on 11 acres of land, have two dogs, two cats, two hermit crabs (not by choice) fish, and little chameleons. On our property there are deer, turkeys, geese, and all kinds of wild birds, I had my boys out the other day and we were walking around Pet Smart where they have stray cats and dogs. My boys wanted to get these kittens and were talking to the lady holding them. She asked about what animals we had.(I had no intention of getting any more animals). She looked at the boys and said: "Well, we would not let you adopt these kittens because you already have so many other animals you would be unable to give the new animals the time, attention, and care they deserve."
I really hope Pitt and Jolie will stop and focus on the children they have. Even though they have endless resources and can afford any type of help,
it's still hard when there are that many young children and you continue to add.
However there are people who have huge families and are successful at it. Who's to say that they aren't capable of it?

Since: Jun 07

New York, NY - Lives in Taipei

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Oct 7, 2008
 
Besides I think it was said at the Premier that they would wait before they consider adopting more kids. So, everyone can breath a sigh of relief.

Since: Aug 08

Cologne

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Oct 7, 2008
 
Denni wrote:
<quoted text>
However there are people who have huge families and are successful at it. Who's to say that they aren't capable of it?
they already need many Nannies for the 6 kids they have now. other people have a huge family but are able to care for the kids themselves, without a Nanny. they should only get so many kids they are able to handle themselves. plus the kids are all in the same age...theyīll get into puberty pretty much all at once. then Brangelina will have an even bigger problem. IF they really continue adopting, then they wonīt be able to take care of tīhe kid in puberty, cause they would have to focus a bit more on the adopted kid(s) or the babies and neglect the rest. i am pretty sure that Brangelina give their best for the kids, its obvious that they love their family more than everything, but they canīt handle all more kids. i hope their love does not turn into obsession. and perhaps Angelina (or Brad) should learn how to cook for her family...i think its very egoistic that they want a family and are not even able to care for them in everyway.

Since: Aug 08

Cologne

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Oct 7, 2008
 
Pamela wrote:
Just because someone has lots of money does not mean it is ok for them to excessively adopt. I was taken aback the other day.
Background. I live on 11 acres of land, have two dogs, two cats, two hermit crabs (not by choice) fish, and little chameleons. On our property there are deer, turkeys, geese, and all kinds of wild birds, I had my boys out the other day and we were walking around Pet Smart where they have stray cats and dogs. My boys wanted to get these kittens and were talking to the lady holding them. She asked about what animals we had.(I had no intention of getting any more animals). She looked at the boys and said: "Well, we would not let you adopt these kittens because you already have so many other animals you would be unable to give the new animals the time, attention, and care they deserve."
I really hope Pitt and Jolie will stop and focus on the children they have. Even though they have endless resources and can afford any type of help,
it's still hard when there are that many young children and you continue to add.
hey Pam!
good post, i agree.
wow your home sounds really great!(and DOGS:))hahahaha ask JT i am such a dog nut...LOL

Since: Aug 08

Cologne

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#24
Oct 7, 2008
 
as for the actual topic...why should they get married before they adopt? what has this has to do with anything? a marriage license does not change a thing. they are parents - even without a ring.

Since: Jun 07

New York, NY - Lives in Taipei

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#27
Oct 7, 2008
 
Freia wrote:
<quoted text>
they already need many Nannies for the 6 kids they have now. other people have a huge family but are able to care for the kids themselves, without a Nanny.
They only have two - not many. And the two that they have don't stay over night.
Freia wrote:
they should only get so many kids they are able to handle themselves.
You guys act like they are the only people on the planet that has six children. It's not so unusual. People seem to forget that they seem to be handling themselves just fine.
Freia wrote:
plus the kids are all in the same age...theyīll get into puberty pretty much all at once.
So. Not every kid that hits puberty gets into trouble or becomes weird.
Freia wrote:
...then Brangelina will have an even bigger problem.
Says who? Again, not every kid that hits puberty becomes a problem. That's just nonsense. That's just wishful thinking.
Freia wrote:
...
IF they really continue adopting, then they wonīt be able to take care of tīhe kid in puberty, cause they would have to focus a bit more on the adopted kid(s) or the babies and neglect the rest.
Says who? How do you know?
Freia wrote:
i am pretty sure that Brangelina give their best for the kids, its obvious that they love their family more than everything, but they canīt handle all more kids.
Says who?
Freia wrote:
i hope their love does not turn into obsession. and perhaps Angelina (or Brad) should learn how to cook for her family.
Says who?
Freia wrote:
..i think its very egoistic that they want a family and are not even able to care for them in everyway.
As long as the kids are eating, so what? There's nothing egoist about it. Not every woman knows how to cook.

Since: Aug 08

Cologne

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#28
Oct 7, 2008
 
Denni wrote:
<quoted text>
They only have two - not many. And the two that they have don't stay over night.
<quoted text>
You guys act like they are the only people on the planet that has six children. It's not so unusual. People seem to forget that they seem to be handling themselves just fine.
<quoted text>
So. Not every kid that hits puberty gets into trouble or becomes weird.
<quoted text>
Says who? Again, not every kid that hits puberty becomes a problem. That's just nonsense. That's just wishful thinking.
<quoted text>
Says who? How do you know?
<quoted text>
Says who?
<quoted text>
Says who?
<quoted text>
As long as the kids are eating, so what? There's nothing egoist about it. Not every woman knows how to cook.
iīm gonna make it short...I say it.:)
many families have many kids...and NO SINGLE nanny.
every kid that hits puberty gets problems...love, friendship, school (well not for the JP kids) etc etc etc.....wishful thinking? nono...believe me wishful thinking is that kids donīt get weird hitting puberty.;)
if a woman does not wnat to cook, thats fine. but if either parent can cook and have to actually pay a cook for their kids, thats egoistic.

Since: Jun 07

New York, NY - Lives in Taipei

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#30
Oct 7, 2008
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Freia wrote:
<quoted text>
iīm gonna make it short...I say it.:)
many families have many kids...and NO SINGLE nanny.
So. Your family isn't in show business. And there is NOTHING wrong with hiring a nanny just as long as you don't rely solely on the nanny.
Freia wrote:
every kid that hits puberty gets problems...love, friendship, school (well not for the JP kids) etc etc etc.
FALSE. Not true. Many people breeze through puberty. You're generalizing - AGAIN.
Freia wrote:
...wishful thinking? nono...believe me wishful thinking is that kids donīt get weird hitting puberty.;)
No, that's not wishful thinking - that's GENERALIZING AGAIN on your part. ;)
Freia wrote:
if a woman does not wnat to cook, thats fine. but if either parent can cook and have to actually pay a cook for their kids, thats egoistic.
Says who? You and your opinion doesn't make that right. The fact is that Angelina said she DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO COOK. And we have no idea if Brad cooks or not.

It's wrong to accuse someone of having an ego just because they don't live up to YOUR expectations. You're very judgemental.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••